Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Diagnosis of Endotoxemia with Gram-Negative Bacteremia Is Bacterial Species Dependent: a Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies

James C. Hurley
James C. Hurley
School of Rural Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Division of Internal Medicine, Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, and Infection Control Committees, Ballarat Health Services and St. John of God Hospital, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jamesh@bhs.org.au
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01189-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Endotoxemia is undetectable for up to 60% of cases of bacteremia caused by gram-negative (GN) species, a discordance attributed to the limitations of the Limulus assay for endotoxemia. The lipid A structure of the endotoxin molecule is critical for the sensing of GN bacteria by the host immune system although not so for sensing by the Limulus assay. The lipid A structure of commensal Enterobacteriaceae is hexa-acyl, whereas non-Enterobacteriaceae have a broader range of structures. By using a previously published classification of lipid A structures (R. S. Munford, Infect. Immun. 76:454-465, 2008), the association of endotoxemia with bacteremia caused by GN organisms is reexamined for 580 GN bacteremic patients from 46 studies. Endotoxemia was less commonly detected for cases of bacteremia caused by Salmonellaenterica serovar Typhi (four studies; 15 of 55 cases of bacteremia [27%]) than for cases of bacteremia caused by Neisseria meningitidis (five studies; 69 of 84 cases [82%]) and Pseudomonas pseudomallei (one study; 38 of 41 cases [93%]) among studies restricted to those with specified cases of bacteremia caused by GN organisms. Among 23 unrestricted studies, endotoxemia was less commonly detected for cases of bacteremia with a commensal member of the Enterobacteriaceae (104 of 240 cases [43%]) than with non-Enterobacteriaceae (59 of 100 cases [59%]) (summary odds ratio, 0.53 [90% confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.85]). This finding is consistent across all the unrestricted studies, even including studies with seemingly contrary results for endotoxemia diagnosis among cases of bacteremia caused by GN bacteria overall. Surprisingly, with bacteremia caused by commensal Enterobacteriaceae, the diagnosis of endotoxemia appears to be unrelated to the Limulus assay sensitivity. Across these 45 studies, the association of endotoxemia with GN bacteremia is variable but consistent for different types of GN bacteremia.

There are key structural differences between the lipid A components of the endotoxin molecule (lipopolysaccharide) of different gram-negative (GN) bacteria. Members of the Enterobacteriaceae characteristically have a lipid A structure with a hexa-acyl structure, whereas other lipid A structures are present for non-Enterobacteriaceae (45). These differences in lipid A structure are now known to be critically important for the recognition of GN bacteremia by the host immune system (45) by the MD-2-Toll-like receptor 4 receptor but not for sensing by the clotting proteins of the blood cells of the Limulus polyphemus horseshoe crab, from which the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay is derived (56). If the recognition of hexa-acyl lipid A by the host immune system has a role in the pathogenesis of bacteremia, it might be expected that the proportion with detectable endotoxemia among patients with GN bacteremia might depend on the lipid A structure of the isolate.

Attempts to define the concordance between GN bacteremia and endotoxemia in patients with sepsis have been elusive. Indeed, two of those studies (15, 54), with over a hundred patients each, concluded that there is no concordance. The purpose of this review is to attempt to reconcile the disparate findings from studies of clinically detected sepsis by examining the proportion with endotoxemia detected by using the Limulus assay for patients with different types of GN bacteremia for which the lipid A structures are known. Of particular interest is the proportion with endotoxemia among cases of bacteremia caused by commensal Enterobacteriaceae versus non-Enterobacteriaceae. The statistical techniques of meta-analysis are used to derive study-specific and summary estimates of these proportions expressed as an OR and more so to obtain estimates of the consistency in these ORs across the panel of studies (24).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data sources.A comprehensive search of the literature from 1966 to April 2009 was performed by using a search strategy detailed previously (27, 29), and a call for data was issued (30). Clarifications of published data were sought from the original authors. This search was in addition to publications obtained from a library of several hundred publications related to clinical aspects of endotoxemia that I accumulated from repeatedly searching the literature over two decades (29, 33).

Study selection and classification of bacteria.The following inclusion criteria were used: (i) comparison of the Limulus assay with blood cultures from patients with suspected GN bacteremia, (ii) the sensitivity of the Limulus assay to an internal endotoxin standard stated, and (iii) a minimum of two patients with GN bacteremia.

The studies were classified regarding whether they were restricted to examining one of four specific GN bacteremias (Salmonellaenterica serovar Typhi, Neisseria meningitidis, Yersinia pestis, and Burkholderia pseudomallei) for which characteristic clinical features facilitate the diagnosis (restricted studies) versus studies that were unrestricted (unrestricted studies). For the unrestricted studies, the bacteria were classified into two groups according to the lipid A structure reported previously (see Table 1 of reference 45) into those known to have a hexa-acyl lipid A structure and those known to have a non-hexa-acyl lipid A structure. The group of bacterial isolates known to have a hexa-acyl lipid A structure is labeled commensal Enterobacteriaceae for the purposes of this analysis, as in the clinical setting, this group consists predominantly of commensal Enterobacteriaceae (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, Proteus mirabilis, and Providencia rettgeri). The group of bacterial isolates known to have a non-hexa-acyl lipid A is labeled as non-Enterobacteriaceae for the purposes of this analysis. Among the unrestricted studies, there were small numbers of the four specified GN bacteria, members of the Enterobacter species (which can have either a hexa-acyl [Enterobacter cloacae] or non-hexa-acyl [Enterobacter agglomerans] lipid A structure) and Haemophilus influenzae (hexa-acyl lipid A structure), and these were all analyzed separately.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Detection of endotoxemia in association with GN bacteremiaa

Data extraction and analysis: calculation of an OR.The endotoxemia diagnosis data for all studies were extracted for all those with GN bacteremia on a per-patient basis. For those unrestricted studies with data available for both commensal Enterobacteriaceae and non-Enterobacteriaceae, the data were extracted into a 2-by-2 contingency table format based on the diagnosis of endotoxemia (Limulus positive) versus no diagnosis (Limulus negative) and the type of GN bacteremia (commensal Enterobacteriaceae versus non-Enterobacteriaceae) to enable the calculation of a study-specific OR and 90% confidence interval (CI). The summary OR and 90% CI were derived by using the Metan command (24) in STATA (release 10.0; STATA Corp., College Station, TX).

Assay sensitivity.The sensitivity of the Limulus assay used in each study is the sensitivity to the internal endotoxin standard stated in each study. The unrestricted studies were stratified into four bands of assay sensitivity as follows: <0.01 ng/ml (assay band A), ≥0.01 to 0.03 ng/ml (assay band B), 0.033 to 0.9 ng/ml (assay band C), and ≥1 ng/ml (assay band D). A nonparametric test for trend was analyzed by using the subtotals derived for each band. The trend in the proportion with detectable endotoxemia across the four bands was then analyzed separately for the commensal Enterobacteriaceae and the non-Enterobacteriaceae.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the studies.Forty-six studies were identified, reporting the results for a total of 580 patients with GN bacteremia published since 1970 (Tables 1 and 2). The listed sensitivity to the internal endotoxin standard used in the assays was in the range of 0.001 to 5 ng/ml. There were 18 studies that had fewer than six patients with GN bacteremia. There was evidence suggestive of publication bias in that 10 of the 18 of studies with fewer than six patients with GN bacteremia reported that the proportion of cases of GN bacteremia that have endotoxemia was 100% (Tables 1 and 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Detection of endotoxemia in association with bacteremia among studies of four specified GN infections (restricted studies)

Unrestricted studies.Of the 34 unrestricted studies, there were 23 with data for both commensal Enterobacteriaceae and non-Enterobacteriaceae. Among those 23 studies, the proportion of cases of GN bacteremia in each study that were commensal Enterobacteriaceae varied from 33% to 100% (median, 60%). From these 23 studies, an OR could be calculated for the proportion with detectable endotoxemia among those with GN bacteremia caused by commensal Enterobacteriaceae versus non-Enterobacteriaceae (Fig. 1). The summary OR was 0.53 (90% CI, 0.33 to 0.85), and there was no significant heterogeneity in the study-specific OR (chi-squared value, 8.8; P = 0.98; 22 df). As a sensitivity analysis, the analysis was repeated after excluding studies with fewer than six bacteremic patients, and the summary OR was 0.55 (90% CI, 0.34 to 0.9), also with no significant heterogeneity (chi-squared value, 7.8; P = 0.96; 16 df). Overall, of the 11 studies with data missing for either commensal Enterobacteriaceae or non-Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia, endotoxemia was detected in 41 of 49 (84%) cases of bacteremia (Table 1).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Forest plot of ORs for endotoxemia with different types of GN bacteremia. The proportions of positive Limulus assay tests (limulus +) for patients with commensal Enterobacteriaceae versus non-Enterobacteriaceae GN bacteremia are presented as study-specific ORs and summary ORs (and 90% CIs) derived from all 23 unrestricted studies without missing data from Table 1, with studies ranked by order of Limulus assay sensitivity. Summary ORs for each subcategory of assay band are also displayed. Arrowheads indicate 90% CIs that extend out of range; limulus + E < nonE indicates the range in ORs for which positive Limulus tests are less common for bacteremia caused by Enterobacteriaceae than non-Enterobacteriaceae; limulus + E > nonE indicates the range in ORs for which positive Limulus tests are more common for bacteremia caused by Enterobacteriaceae than non-Enterobacteriaceae.

Restricted studies.Among 12 studies that were restricted to one of the four specified types of GN bacteremia (Table 2), the proportion with detectable endotoxemia was lowest for studies that examined Salmonella serovar Typhi bacteremia (four studies; 15 of 55 cases of bacteremia [27%]) compared to studies of Neisseria meningitidis (five studies; 69 of 84 cases of bacteremia [82%]) and Pseudomonas pseudomallei (one study; 38 of 41 cases of bacteremia [93%]).

Assay sensitivity.Among all 34 of the unrestricted studies, there was no significant difference in the proportion of cases with detectable endotoxemia over the bands of listed assay sensitivity for the commensal Enterobacteriaceae (chi-squared value, 2.27; P = 0.52; 3 df), although among the non-Enterobacteriaceae, there was a significant trend toward a higher proportion with detectable endotoxemia in the bands with the more sensitive assays (chi-squared value, 4.9; P = 0.03; 1 df). Repetition of the analysis after excluding studies with fewer than six cases of bacteremia reached the same conclusion (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

In this analysis of 46 clinical studies of endotoxemia diagnosis using the Limulus assay for cases of GN bacteremia with different types of lipid A structures, three surprising observations are noted. Among the unrestricted studies, the proportion of cases with detectable endotoxemia is lower when the GN bacterium responsible for bacteremia is a member of the commensal Enterobacteriaceae than when it its not a member of the Enterobacteriaceae. Moreover, this finding is consistent across a broad range of studies, including studies (39, 54) that reached seemingly contrary findings regarding the diagnostic utility of the Limulus assay with regard to endotoxemia diagnosis among cases of bacteremia caused by GN bacteria overall (Fig. 1). A second finding is that the proportion with detectable endotoxemia for cases of bacteremia caused by commensal Enterobacteriaceae appears to be unrelated to the sensitivity limit of the Limulus assay, as used in each study, over a 1,000-fold range in sensitivity to an internal endotoxin standard. Third, the proportion of cases of bacteremia with associated endotoxemia caused by GN species is highest among studies that were restricted to cases of bacteremia with N. meningitidis or B. pseudomallei, and these findings are not representative of the general diagnostic experience among unrestricted studies.

There is possible evidence of publication bias with studies that were smaller or had missing data showing atypical results. However, the conclusions of this analysis are robust regarding the inclusion or exclusion of these studies.

There are a number of limitations of this analysis. The 34 unrestricted studies were heterogeneous with respect to year of publication, patient numbers and demographics, bacteremia diagnosis and isolate identification methods, plasma extraction methods, and types of GN bacteremia. A further limitation is that the number of samples evaluated per patient in each study is not known and cannot be evaluated. Despite this heterogeneity among the studies, there is no statistical heterogeneity in the study-specific ORs among the unrestricted studies. This would not have been so readily appreciated from a either a single study in isolation or a review of the studies in the traditional narrative style without the statistical techniques of meta-analysis. Moreover, this analysis reveals that the range in the proportion of cases of bacteremia caused by commensal Enterobacteriaceae versus non-Enterobacteriaceae among the total number of cases of GN bacteremia varies widely, from 33% to 100%. This could account for the contrary conclusions regarding the diagnostic utility of the Limulus assay made in studies with a low (54) or high (39) proportion of commensal Enterobacteriaceae among the cases of GN bacteremia.

The presumption that in patients with GN sepsis, GN bacteremia and endotoxemia must always be associated with each other, even at low levels, in part contributed to earlier criticisms of the Limulus assay (15, 54) and stimulated the development of more sensitive versions. The findings that in other clinical settings, the concentration of endotoxin detected by the Limulus assay is proportional to the GN bacterial CFU count, such as in bronchoalveolar lavage samples from patients with pneumonia (50) and in urine samples of bacteruric patients (32), reinforced this presumption. However, this analysis of GN bacteremia indicates that the type of bacteremia isolate is critical to the application of the Limulus assay, which helps to explain why the mix of GN bacteremia isolates is influential in the concordance of GN bacteremia with the Limulus test of plasma (29). This is because endotoxin is undetectable for >50% of cases of bacteremia caused by the Enterobacteriaceae, regardless of the level of assay sensitivity.

The Limulus assay, a biological assay, is the most sensitive test available for the diagnosis of endotoxin (13). However, in comparisons using either the Limulus assay or other biological assays, the activity of endotoxin is not a uniform gravimetric property for endotoxins of different bacterial origins (12). Additionally, both the reaction kinetics (33) and the sensing of endotoxin by the Limulus assay (60) are affected by human plasma. It remains to be determined whether these effects of plasma differ for endotoxins from different types of GN bacteria. Moreover, the relationship between the diagnosis of endotoxemia and the clinical manifestations of sepsis has not been examined here (28, 31).

This analysis of 46 previously published clinical studies does not support the presumption that for patients with GN sepsis, GN bacteremia must always be associated with endotoxemia, but it suggests that there is a variable association of endotoxemia with GN bacteremia, which is consistent for different types of GN bacteremia.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank M. Yoshida, Jichi Medical School, Japan; E. J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece; R. Danner, NIH, Bethesda, MD; B. Guidet, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France; K. C. H. Fearon, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, Scotland; D. Massignon, Center Hospitalier Lyon Sud, France; and D. Bates, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, for the clarification of previously published data.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 14 June 2009.
    • Returned for modification 20 August 2009.
    • Accepted 6 September 2009.
  • Copyright © 2009 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Adinolfi, L. E., R. Utili, G. B. Gaeta, P. Perna, and G. Ruggiero. 1987. Presence of endotoxemia and its relationship to liver dysfunction in patients with typhoid fever. Infection15:359-362.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.
    Ahmed, T., M. A. Azam, N. Armed, K. M. Jamil, F. Hassan, N. Ogura, H. Tamura, and T. Yokochi. 2004. Detection of endotoxin in sera from children hospitalized for treatment of diarrhea in Bangladesh. J. Endotox. Res.10:223-228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.
    Bion, J. F., I. Badger, H. A. Crosby, P. Hutchings, K. L. Kong, J. Baker, P. Hutton, P. McMaster, J. A. Buckels, and T. S. Elliott. 1994. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract reduces gram-negative pulmonary colonization but not systemic endotoxemia in patients undergoing elective liver transplantation. Crit. Care Med.22:40-49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.
    Bjorvatn, B., L. Bjertnaes, H. O. Fadnes, T. Flaegstad, T. J. Gutteberg, B. E. Kristiansen, J. Pape, O. P. Rekvig, B. Osterud, and L. Aanderud. 1984. Meningococcal septicaemia treated with combined plasmapheresis and leucapheresis or with blood exchange. BMJ288:439-441.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.
    Brandtzaeg, P., P. Kierulf, P. Gaustad, A. Skulberg, J. N. Bruun, S. Halvorsen, and E. Sorensen. 1989. Plasma endotoxin as a predictor of multiple organ failure and death in systemic meningococcal disease. J. Infect. Dis.159:195-204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.
    Butler, T., W. R. Bell, J. Levin, N. N. Linh, and K. Arnold. 1978. Typhoid fever. Studies of blood coagulation, bacteremia, and endotoxemia. Arch. Intern. Med.138:407-410.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.
    Butler, T., J. Levin, C. Do Quang, and R. I. Walker. 1973. Bubonic plague: detection of endotoxemia with the limulus test. Ann. Intern. Med.79:642-646.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.
    Butler, T., J. Levin, N. N. Linh, D. M. Chau, M. Adickman, and K. Arnold. 1976. Yersinia pestis infection in Vietnam. II. Quantiative blood cultures and detection of endotoxin in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with meningitis. J. Infect. Dis.133:493-499.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.
    Clumeck, N., S. Lauwers, A. Kahn, M. Mommens, and J. P. Butzler. 1976. Contribution of the “limulus test” to the diagnosis of endotoxemias and meningitis due to gram negative bacteria. Nouv. Presse Med.6:1451-1454. (In French.)
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.
    Cooperstock, M., and L. Riegle. 1985. Plasma Limulus gelation assay in infants and children: correlation with gram negative bacterial infection and evidence for “intestinal endotoxemia.” Prog. Clin. Biol. Res.189:329-345.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.
    Danner, R. L., R. J. Elin, J. M. Hosseini, R. A. Wesley, J. M. Reilly, and J. E. Parillo. 1991. Endotoxemia in human septic shock. Chest99:169-175.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Dehus, O., T. Hartung, and C. Hermann. 2006. Endotoxin evaluation of eleven lipopolysaccharides by whole blood assay does not always correlate with Limulus amebocyte lysate assay. J. Endotox. Res.12:171-180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Devleeschouwer, M. J., M. F. Cornil, and J. Dony. 1985. Studies on the sensitivity and specificity of the Limulus amebocyte lysate test and rabbit pyrogen assays. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.50:1509-1511.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.
    Dofferhoff, A. S., V. J. Bom, H. G. de Vries-Hospers, J. van Ingen, J. van der Meer, B. P. Hazenberg, P. O. Mulder, and J. Weits. 1992. Patterns of cytokines, plasma endotoxin, plasminogen activator inhibitor, and acute-phase proteins during the treatment of severe sepsis in humans. Crit. Care Med.20:185-192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Elin, R. J., R. A. Robinson, A. S. Levine, and S. M. Wolff. 1975. Lack of clinical usefulness of the limulus test in the diagnosis of endotoxemia. N. Engl. J. Med.293:521-524.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.
    Exley, A. R., T. Leese, M. P. Holliday, R. A. Swann, and J. Cohen. 1992. Endotoxaemia and serum tumour necrosis factor as prognostic markers in severe acute pancreatitis. Gut33:1126-1128.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.
    Feldman, S., and T. A. Pearson. 1974. The Limulus test and gram-negative bacillary sepsis. Am. J. Dis. Child.128:172-174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.
    Fink, P. C., and J. H. Grunert. 1984. Endotoxemia in intensive care patients: a longitudinal study with the limulus amebocyte lysate test. Klin. Wochenschr.62:986-991. (In German.)
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.
    Fossard, D. P., and V. V. Kakkar. 1974. The Limulus test in experimental and clinical endotoxaemia. Br. J. Surg.61:798-804.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.
    Gardlund, B., J. Sjolin, A. Nilsson, M. Roll, C. J. Wickerts, and B. Wretlind. 1995. Plasma levels of cytokines in primary septic shock in humans: correlation with disease severity. J. Infect. Dis.172:296-301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.
    Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E. J., J. Perdios, M. Lelekis, E. Eoconomou, P. Tsouroulas, and H. Giamarellou. 1999. Impact of cefuroxime administration on endotoxin (LPS) and tumour necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) blood levels in patients suffering from acute pyelonephritis: a preliminary report. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents11:115-119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.
    Goldie, A. S., K. C. Fearon, J. A. Ross, G. R. Barclay, R. E. Jackson, I. S. Grant, G. Ramsay, A. S. Blyth, J. C. Howie, et al. 1995. Natural cytokine antagonists and endogenous antiendotoxin core antibodies in sepsis syndrome. JAMA274:172-177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.
    Guidet, B., V. Barakett, T. Vassal, J. C. Petit, and G. Offenstadt. 1994. Endotoxemia and bacteremia in patients with sepsis syndrome in the intensive care unit. Chest106:1194-1201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Harris, R. J., M. J. Bradburn, J. J. Deeks, R. M. Harbord, D. G. Altman, and J. A. C. Sterne. 2008. Metan: fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis. Stata J.8:3-28.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.
    Harthug, S., B. Bjorvatn, and B. Osterud. 1983. Quantitation of endotoxin in blood from patients with meningococcal disease using a limulus lysate test in combination with chromogenic substrate. Infection11:192-195.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.
    Hass, A., M. I. Rossberg, H. L. Hodes, A. C. Hyatt, and D. S. Hodes. 1986. Endotoxin levels in immunocompromised children with fever. J. Pediatr.109:265-269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Hurley, J. C. 1994. Concordance of endotoxemia with gram-negative bacteremia in patients with gram-negative sepsis: a meta-analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol.32:2120-2127.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    Hurley, J. C. 1995. Endotoxemia: methods of detection and clinical correlates. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.8:268-292.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Hurley, J. C. 2000. Concordance of endotoxemia with gram-negative bacteremia. A meta-analysis using receiver operating characteristic curves. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.124:1157-1164.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Hurley, J. C. 2001. Endotoxemia and gram-negative bacteremia as predictors of outcome in sepsis: a call for data. J. Endotox. Res.7:467.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    Hurley, J. C., and J. Levin. 1999. Relevance of endotoxin detection in sepsis, p. 841-854. In H. Brade, S. Opal, S. Vogel, and D. Morrison (ed.), Endotoxin in health and disease. Marcel Dekker Limited, New York, NY.
  32. 32.↵
    Hurley, J. C., and F. A. Tosolini. 1992. A quantitative micro-assay for endotoxin and correlation with bacterial density in urine. J. Microbiol. Methods16:91-99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    Hurley, J. C., F. A. Tosolini, and W. J. Louis. 1991. Quantitative Limulus lysate assay for endotoxin and the effect of plasma. J. Clin. Pathol.44:849-854.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.
    Hynninen, M., M. Valtonen, M. Vaara, H. Markkanen, P. Kuusela, H. Saxen, and O. Takkunen. 1995. Plasma endotoxin and cytokine levels in neutropenic and non-neutropenic bacteremic patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.14:1039-1045.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.
    Jirillo, E., N. Pasquetto, L. Marcuccio, R. Monno, P. De Rinaldis, and D. Fumarola. 1975. Endotoxemia detected by Limulus assay in severe malnourished children. Plasma effects on leucocyte migration: preliminary investigations. G. Batteriol. Virol. Immunol.68:174-178. (In Italian.)
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. 36.
    Kelsey, M. C., A. P. Lipscomb, and J. M. Mowles. 1982. Limulus amoebocyte lysate endotoxin test: an aid to the diagnosis in the septic neonate? J. Infect.4:69-72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.
    Ketchum, P. A., J. Parsonnet, L. S. Stotts, T. J. Novitsky, B. Schlain, and D. W. Bates. 1997. Utilization of a chromogenic Limulus amebocyte lysate blood assay in a multi-center study of sepsis. J. Endotox. Res.4:9-16.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.
    Lau, J. Y., S. C. Chung, J. W. Leung, T. K. Ling, M. Y. Yung, and A. K. Li. 1996. Endoscopic drainage aborts endotoxaemia in acute cholangitis. Br. J. Surg.83:181-184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    Levin, J., T. E. Poore, N. S. Young, S. Margolis, N. P. Zauber, A. S. Townes, and W. R. Bell. 1972. Gram-negative sepsis: detection of endotoxemia with the limulus test. With studies of associated changes in blood coagulation, serum lipids, and complement. Ann. Intern. Med.76:1-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.
    Magliulo, E., D. Scevola, D. Fumarola, R. Vaccaro, A. Bertotto, and S. Burberi. 1976. Clinical experience in detecting endotoxemia with the limulus test in typhoid fever and other Salmonella infections. Infection4:21-24.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.
    Martinez, L. A., R. Quintiliani, and R. C. Tilton. 1973. Clinical experience on the detection of endotoxemia with the limulus test. J. Infect. Dis.127:102-105.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.
    Massignon, D., A. Lepape, G. Debize, M. F. Remillieux, V. DePasquale, V. Banssillon, P. Coeur, et al. 1996. Detection of gram-negative bacteraemia in early sepsis by a quantitative chromogenic and kinetic endotoxin assay. Eur. J. Clin. Investig.26:596-601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.
    McCartney, A. C., M. R. Robertson, B. I. Piotrowicz, and N. P. Lucie. 1987. Endotoxaemia, fever and clinical status in immunosuppressed patients: a preliminary study. J. Infect.15:201-206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.
    McGladdery, S., R. Larasati, N. Silitonga, N. Punjabi, M. Lesmana, S. Pulungsih, and P. O'Hanley. 1993. Acute inflammatory cytokine response in typhoid fever, abstr. 284. Abstracts of the 1993 IDSA Annual Meeting. Clin. Infect. Dis.17:578.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    Munford, R. S. 2008. Sensing gram-negative bacterial lipopolysaccharides: a human disease determinant? Infect. Immun.76:454-465.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  46. 46.
    Oberle, M. W., G. G. Graham, and J. Levin. 1974. Detection of endotoxemia with the Limulus test: preliminary studies in severely malnourished children. J. Pediatr.85:570-573.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.
    Pearson, F. C., J. Dubczak, M. Weary, G. Bruszer, and G. Donohue. 1985. Detection of endotoxin in the plasma of patients with gram-negative bacterial sepsis by the Limulus amoebocyte lysate assay. J. Clin. Microbiol.21:865-868.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.
    Prins, J. M., F. N. Lauw, B. H. Derkx, P. Speelman, E. J. Kuijper, J. Dankert, and S. J. van Deventer. 1998. Endotoxin release and cytokine production in acute and chronic meningococcaemia. Clin. Exp. Immunol.114:215-219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.
    Prins, J. M., M. A. van Agtmael, E. J. Kuijper, S. J. van Deventer, and P. Speelman. 1995. Antibiotic-induced endotoxin release in patients with gram-negative urosepsis: a double-blind study comparing imipenem and ceftazidime. J. Infect. Dis.172:886-891.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    Pugin, J., R. Auckenthaler, O. Delaspre, E. van Gessel, and P. M. Suter. 1992. Rapid diagnosis of gram negative pneumonia by assay of endotoxin in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Thorax47:547-549.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.
    Scheifele, D. W., E. M. Olsen, and M. R. Pendray. 1985. Endotoxinemia and thrombocytopenia during neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Am. J. Clin. Pathol.83:227-229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.
    Shenep, J. L., P. M. Flynn, F. F. Barrett, G. L. Stidham, and D. F. Westenkirchner. 1988. Serial quantitation of endotoxemia and bacteremia during therapy for gram-negative bacterial sepsis. J. Infect. Dis.157:565-568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.
    Simpson, A. J., S. M. Opal, B. J. Angus, J. M. Prins, J. E. Palardy, N. A. Parejo, W. Chaowagul, and N. J. White. 2000. Differential antibiotic-induced endotoxin release in severe melioidosis. J. Infect. Dis.181:1014-1019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    Stumacher, R. J., M. J. Kovnat, and W. R. McCabe. 1973. Limitations of the usefulness of the Limulus assay for endotoxin. N. Engl. J. Med.288:1261-1264.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.
    Suyasa, I. G., I. G. Reka, K. Inada, H. Suda, M. Kojima, K. Mushiaki, S. Okamoto, and M. Yoshida. 1995. Plasma endotoxin in typhoid fever. Kobe J. Med. Sci.41:175-186.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    Takada, H., S. Kotani, S. Tanaka, T. Ogawa, I. Takahashi, M. Tsujimoto, T. Komuro, T. Shiba, S. Kusumoto, N. Kusunose, A. Hasegawa, and M. Kiso. 1988. Structural requirements of lipid A species in activation of clotting enzymes from the horseshoe crab, and the human complement cascade. Eur. J. Biochem.175:573-580.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.
    van Deventer, S. J., H. R. Buller, J. W. ten Cate, A. Sturk, and W. Pauw. 1988. Endotoxaemia: an early predictor of septicaemia in febrile patients. Lanceti:605-609.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.
    van Dissel, J. T., R. van Furth, B. A. Compier, H. D. Feuth, and M. Frolich. 1993. Survival in selected patients with gram-negative sepsis after adjunctive therapy with HA-1A. Lancet341:959-960.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.
    van Wieringen, P. M., L. A. Monnens, and J. A. Bakkeren. 1976. Hemolytic-uremic syndrome: absence of circulating endotoxin. Pediatrics58:561-563.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 60.↵
    Warren, H. S., T. J. Novitsky, P. A. Ketchum, P. F. Roslansky, S. Kania, and G. R. Siber. 1985. Neutralization of bacterial lipopolysaccharides by human plasma. J. Clin. Microbiol.22:590-595.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.
    Yoshida, M., T. Obayashi, H. Tamura, S. Tanaka, T. Kawai, S. Sakamoto, and Y. Miura. 1994. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of plasma endotoxin determination in febrile patients with haematological malignancies. Eur. J. Cancer30A:145-147.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Diagnosis of Endotoxemia with Gram-Negative Bacteremia Is Bacterial Species Dependent: a Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies
James C. Hurley
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Nov 2009, 47 (12) 3826-3831; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01189-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnosis of Endotoxemia with Gram-Negative Bacteremia Is Bacterial Species Dependent: a Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Diagnosis of Endotoxemia with Gram-Negative Bacteremia Is Bacterial Species Dependent: a Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies
James C. Hurley
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Nov 2009, 47 (12) 3826-3831; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01189-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

bacteremia
Endotoxemia
Gram-negative bacteria

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X