Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Multiplex PCR Testing Detection of Higher-than-Expected Rates of Cervical Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma, and Trichomonas and Viral Agent Infections in Sexually Active Australian Women

Christopher J. McIver, Nikolas Rismanto, Catherine Smith, Zin Wai Naing, Ben Rayner, M. Josephine Lusk, Pamela Konecny, Peter A. White, William D. Rawlinson
Christopher J. McIver
1Virology Division, Microbiology Department (SEALS), Prince of Wales Hospital
2School of Medical Sciences
3School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikolas Rismanto
1Virology Division, Microbiology Department (SEALS), Prince of Wales Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Smith
1Virology Division, Microbiology Department (SEALS), Prince of Wales Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zin Wai Naing
1Virology Division, Microbiology Department (SEALS), Prince of Wales Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ben Rayner
1Virology Division, Microbiology Department (SEALS), Prince of Wales Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Josephine Lusk
4Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pamela Konecny
2School of Medical Sciences
4Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter A. White
3School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William D. Rawlinson
1Virology Division, Microbiology Department (SEALS), Prince of Wales Hospital
2School of Medical Sciences
3School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: w.rawlinson@unsw.edu.au
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01873-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Knowing the prevalence of potential etiologic agents of nongonococcal and nonchlamydial cervicitis is important for improving the efficacy of empirical treatments for this commonly encountered condition. We describe four multiplex PCRs (mPCRs), designated VDL05, VDL06, VDL07, and VDL09, which facilitate the detection of a wide range of agents either known to be or putatively associated with cervicitis, including cytomegalovirus (CMV), enterovirus (EV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) (VDL05); Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Mycoplasma hominis (VDL06); Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Treponema pallidum, and group B streptococci (VDL07); and adenovirus species A to E (VDL09). The mPCRs were used to test 233 cervical swabs from 175 women attending a sexual-health clinic in Sydney, Australia, during 2006 and 2007. The agents detected alone or in combination in all cervical swabs (percentage of total swabs) included CMV (6.0), EV (2.1), EBV (2.6), VZV (4.7), HSV-1 (2.6), HSV-2 (0.8), HSV-2 and VZV (0.4), U. parvum (57.0), U. urealyticum (6.1), M. genitalium (1.3), M. hominis (13.7), C. trachomatis (0.4), T. vaginalis (3.4), and group B streptococci (0.4). Adenovirus species A to E and T. pallidum were not detected. These assays are adaptable for routine diagnostic laboratories and provide an opportunity to measure the true prevalence of microorganisms potentially associated with cervicitis and other genital infections.

Cervicitis, an acute or chronic inflammation of the uterine cervix, is generally viewed as a consequence of infection with sexually transmissible agents. Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis are the most commonly reported pathogens, possibly because they are most frequently screened for. However, the etiology of most cases is undetermined and could be multifactorial in nature (11, 34, 35, 40). Studies undertaken in other epidemiologic settings indicate significant differences in the prevalences of other cervical infectious agents (1, 41, 44, 45, 58). An underappreciation of the prevalences of and roles played by these nongonococcal and nonchlamydial agents potentially jeopardizes the effectiveness of empirical treatments for cervicitis. Unresolved cervicitis can result in ascending infection, endometritis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and salpingitis (11, 23, 46). Furthermore, cervicitis may enhance human immunodeficiency virus susceptibility by the disruption of mucosa, allowing increased viral replication within recruited inflammatory cells (30). The development of molecular methods, such as PCR and DNA hybridization, has allowed the detection of a range of agents whose etiologic roles in genital infections need to be further investigated, including the viruses cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2 (4, 43), adenovirus (6, 10, 50), and the Mollicutes Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, and Mycoplasma genitalium (1, 28, 59). There have also been reports of genital infections caused by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (4, 55), varicella-zoster virus (VZV) (27), and enterovirus (EV) (24). We report here the use of four multiplex PCR (mPCR) assays, designated VDL05, VDL06, VDL07, and VDL09, based on a conventional platform, for the detection of 19 microorganisms in cervical swabs, including Treponema pallidum and C. trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, group B streptococci, and five adenovirus species, in addition to those mentioned above. The assays were developed using cervical swabs from different women taken on one or more occasions during different visits to a sexual-health clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients.Cervical swabs (n = 233) were taken from 175 women consecutively attending a sexual-health clinic in Sydney, Australia (between one and three visits), during 2006 and 2007 who were all eligible for recruitment to an as-yet-unpublished case-control study investigating cervicitis. They included women with and without cervicitis. All of the women were aged ≥18 years, had been sexually active in the preceding 3 months, required an internal examination regardless of symptoms, had not been treated with antibiotics or received gynecologic intervention in the preceding month, did not have an intrauterine contraceptive device in situ, and were not currently menstruating or pregnant. Women with pelvic inflammatory disease were excluded. Written informed consent was obtained from all of the women. The study protocol and data management were approved by the South Eastern Sydney and Illawarra Area Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee.

Sampling procedure.The cervix was accessed using a sterile metal speculum and was prepared for swabbing by removing exudate with a large nonsterile swab (Multigate Medical Products, China). An initial swab of the endocervix was taken with a sterile cotton swab (Copan, California) and was used to screen bacterial agents before being placed in viral transport medium 199 (Gibco Invitrogen, New York) and stored at −70°C. Two consecutive specimens from the same region were taken using viral transport swabs (Copan Diagnostics), suspended in viral transport medium, and stored at −70°C. These two specimens were tested by the assays described below.

Nucleic acid extraction and PCR amplification.The swabs were suspended in 500 μl of universal viral transport medium before extraction of the total nucleic acid using a robotic extraction machine (MagNaPure LC; Roche, Germany) applying the Total NA protocol according to the manufacturer's instructions (Roche, Germany). Extracts were stored at 4°C before being tested within 48 h of collection.

Detection of Mollicutes species (VDL06).A single-round mPCR using Qiagen OneStep reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (Qiagen, Gemany) master mix was designed to detect U. parvum, U. urealyticum, M. genitalium, and M. hominis. This commercial master mix was used to conform to other molecular procedures currently used in diagnostic laboratories, allowing simplified quality assurance and workflow. The reaction mixtures were prepared in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for a 50-μl reaction and consisted of 5.8 μl of RNase-free water, 10.0 μl of buffer, 2.0 μl of deoxynucleoside triphosphate mix, 2.5 μl of each primer (including primers for internal control at a final concentration of 0.5 μM) (Table 1), 2.0 μl Qiagen OneStep RT-PCR enzyme mix at a final activity of 0.5 U, 0.2 μl digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Roche, Germany), and 10 μl of template. The cycling procedures included an RT step at 50°C for 30 min, denaturation at 95°C for 15 min, and then 50 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, a final extension of 7 min at 72°C, and a 4°C hold. The products were visualized by gel electrophoresis, and the amplicons were identified by probe hybridization, followed by PCR enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (digoxigenin detection) (Roche, Germany). Known-positive clinical samples were used as reaction controls for the PCR.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Oligonucleotides used in molecular detection methods

Virus detection (VDL05).A nested mPCR of the same designation previously described (38) was used without modification for the detection of CMV, HSV-1, HSV-2, EBV, EV, and VZV. Briefly, a first-round reaction comprising 20 μl of template, 0.5 μl of AmpErase (uracil N-glycosylase) (Applied Biosystems), and 0.10 μM of each primer (38) was included in a 50-μl reaction mixture of the Qiagen OneStep RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Germany). A second-round reaction was undertaken using 2 μl of first-round product, 0.2 μl digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Roche, Germany), and 0.10 μM of each primer in a 50-μl reaction mixture of AmpliTaq Gold PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). The thermocycling conditions used for each round were as previously described (38). The products were visualized by gel electrophoresis, and the amplicons were identified by probe hybridization (as described above).

Detection of adenovirus species A to E (VDL09).The adenovirus detection method is based on that previously described by Xu et al. (56) and was modified to conform to the above-mentioned protocols. A single-round reaction was performed comprising 5 μl of template and 0.20 μM of each primer (Table 1) in a 50-μl reaction mixture of AmpliTaq Gold PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). The thermocycling conditions included a preliminary denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min, 30 cycles of amplification (denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 54°C for 45 s, and extension at 72°C for 2 min), and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The products were visualized using gel electrophoresis.

Detection of other agents (VDL07).Using the primers listed in Table 1, an mPCR was developed using the same protocol as for VDL05 for the detection of C. trachomatis, T. vaginalis, T. pallidum, and group B streptococci.

Measurement of sensitivity and specificity.As an adequate number of positive controls (cultures or proven positives) were not available for most agents, the sensitivities of the assays were assessed by measuring the limit of detection of plasmid constructs of the target sites for each agent. Briefly, amplification products from first-round (or single-round) reactions were cloned using the pGEM-T Easy Vector System II (Promega), and constructs were extracted using the Wizard PCR Preps DNA purification system (Promega). The genomic concentration was measured using the NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies). The limit of detection for each target site was defined as the lowest dilution of a series of serially diluted (1:10) plasmid constructs that was amplified by each assay. The specificity was determined by testing proven-negative samples.

Controls.Positive controls for the above-mentioned assays were derived from either culture-proven or molecularly proven sources. Amplification of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene from all samples using previously described primers (38) was performed to validate extraction and PCRs.

RESULTS

The limit of detection (Table 1) for each agent ranged from 10 (for T. vaginalis) to 105 (for T. pallidum) copies per reaction. False positives were not detected when between 17 and 96 proven-negative control samples of each agent were tested.

The results of the screening of 233 cervical swabs from 175 women by the four mPCRs are shown in Table 2. The total agents detected among the 175 participating women at the initial and subsequent visits are also shown. The Mollicutes were the most common group of organisms detected, and were recovered from 159 (68.2%) of the 233 cervical swabs tested. Either alone or in combination with another member of the Mollicutes, U. parvum was the species most commonly detected (57.0%), followed by M. hominis (13.7%), U. urealyticum (6.1%), and M. genitalium (1.3%). CMV was the predominant virus detected (6.0%), followed by VZV (4.3%). The remaining viruses (EV, EBV, HSV-1, and HSV-2) were each detected in <3% of the samples, and adenoviruses (A to E) were not detected. T. vaginalis (4.0%) was the commonest agent detected by VDL07 (for other agents). C. trachomatis and group B streptococci were detected in <1% of these samples, while T. pallidum was not detected.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Use of mPCRs for screening nongonococcal agents in cervical swabs

Multiple infections were detected in 42 (24.0%) of the 175 women tested. Two of these patients had multiple infections on two separate occasions. All 44 coinfections included a Mollicutes sp., most commonly U. parvum (88.6%). Of the eight patients diagnosed with trichomoniasis, six (75.0%) had coinfections with U. parvum. Two of these patients were also coinfected with either VZV or CMV.

DISCUSSION

mPCR assays allow simultaneous detection of multiple agents in a single reaction and were applied here to detect a broad range of microorganisms. The mPCRs developed in this study are based on those we previously described for the detection of viruses in a routine diagnostic laboratory (38) utilizing identical reagent and cycling conditions. This simplifies the workflow, allowing performance of these assays in a routine diagnostic laboratory with basic molecular facilities. The choice of a commercial master mix including a reverse transcriptase reaction benefits a busy laboratory environment where both RNA and DNA agents are being detected.

The mPCRs VDL05 and VDL07 are nested PCRs to increase sensitivity, while specificity is enhanced with a post-PCR probe hybridization assay. The adenovirus mPCR (VDL09) was limited to a single-round reaction without post-PCR probe hybridization because of variation in regions targeted by the species-specific primers (57). A single-round PCR was used to detect M. hominis, M. genitalium, U. parvum, and U. urealyticum (VDL06). The method developed by Yoshida et al. (59) was first considered for the detection of these agents. However, our evaluation of this method showed cross-reactions with the hybridization reactions for U. parvum (serotypes 6 and 149) and U. urealyticum and weak reactions for U. parvum with wild strains of M. hominis (data not shown). The mPCR employed in this study utilizes the method of Yoshida et al. for the detection of Mycoplasma spp. and includes specific primers for U. parvum (28) and U. urealyticum (54). These primer sets allow differentiation of the ureaplasmas by characteristic electrophoretic-band sizes, which are confirmed by probe hybridization.

CMV was the most frequent virus detected using the VDL05 mPCR. CMV is not a common cause of cervicitis in immunocompetent women (37). However, studies in China have shown detection rates of 5.1% in a prospective study of women with cervical human papillomavirus (58) and 14.0% in erosive cervicitis (44), possibly as a result of cervical carriage and reactivation by localized inflammation (36). Infection in pregnancy may cause spontaneous abortion, and there is a significant risk of fetal infection with congenital abnormalities (3, 8, 37). In this study, CMV was detected in 6.3% of female patients tested, which is a prevalence not previously reported in Australian clinics, suggesting the need to consider routine testing in pregnant high-risk patients.

Previous studies have suggested that most genital HSV infections are caused by HSV-2 (13, 42, 43, 52). Consistent with more recent findings (6, 13, 17, 29, 56) increasingly implicating HSV-1 in genital infection, we detected HSV-1 (3.4%) more commonly than HSV-2 (1.7%) in the female patients tested. An early study in China showed detection rates in erosive cervicitis to be as high as 26.5% (44), with asymptomatic shedding potentially an important means of transmission (13). None of the 175 women in our study had genital erosions or clinical signs of acute HSV infection at the time of testing.

There have been reports of EBV-associated genital ulcers in women (2, 7, 14, 21, 25, 32, 53, 55). This condition is underrecognized and may be incorrectly attributed to HSV infection (7, 32, 53). However, the clinical relevance of our detection of EBV in 3.4% of female patients in this study has yet to be established. A recent study showed strong evidence for sexual transmission of the virus from a partner infected with infectious mononucleosis (55). In a study in Thailand of women with HSV-associated genital herpes, 17/30 (56.7%) cases were found to have EBV DNA present, although the clinical significance was not determined (25).

The presence of EV in the female genital tract may also be a predisposition to antenatal and perinatal infection (3). An early study in Russia detected antigens of coxsackie A and B virus in the vaginal secretions of 16.3% of young girls with protracted forms of vulvovaginitis (33). More recently, a study in Central Africa detected EV RNA in nearly 10% of women of childbearing age, which may be the basis for possible antenatal or perinatal transmission from mother-to-child (24). Detection of EV in 2.8% of the women in our study indicates the proportion of patients at risk, but again, the clinical relevance has yet to be determined.

The Mollicutes detected in this study are associated with infections of the genitourinary tract, reproductive failure, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Our detection rates of the four species of the Mollicutes putatively associated with genital infection are consistent with previous studies, with U. parvum being the commonest (26, 45, 49). Detection of M. genitalium is becoming increasingly important because of recent reports of a high prevalence of the organism in women with cervicitis (15, 41, 45). Furthermore, the high prevalence of infected sexual partners supports its role as a sexually transmitted infection (15).

The VDLO7 mPCR screens organisms with larger genomes and was reduced to four detectable agents to minimize template competition. In this assay, T. vaginalis was the most commonly detected agent in women at 4.0% and was included, as there has been a proven advantage of molecular techniques over the insensitive traditional methods of direct visualization and wet-mount microscopy (47, 51) and Pap smear. Inclusion in this assay enabled detection of trichomoniasis, which is sexually transmissible and often asymptomatic. T. vaginalis is associated with pelvic inflammatory diseases and adverse birth outcomes (51) and is also linked to an increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission (48). Vaginal colonization with group B streptococci is not normally symptomatic or associated with sexual transmission. However, cervical colonization is relevant to pathology of the fetus and newborn, and significant morbidity may arise if group B streptococcus is not detected and eradicated (23). C. trachomatis is commonly associated with cervicitis and is the most frequent cause of bacterial sexually transmitted infection worldwide (9, 15, 18, 22). The detection rate of chlamydial infections (<1%) in this study is lower than expected for this population and could be explained in part by the exclusion of women with pelvic inflammatory disease and recent antibiotic treatment from the study population. As was evident again here, syphilitic cervicitis is uncommon but is important to diagnose because infection may clinically and colposcopically simulate a primary advanced cervical cancer (19, 20). Ideally, the assay for this agent should be more sensitive and should be performed as a monoplex to increase sensitivity for high-risk patients.

Although uncommon, adenovirus has been associated with genital infections (5, 6, 50). We did not detect adenovirus in the women examined here. Recent Australian studies of men with urethritis showed that the infection is uncommon and seasonal (6).

A test for N. gonorrhoeae was not considered in this development because of reports of cross-reactivity in commercial and published methods with closely related strains, such as Neisseria subflava and Neisseria cinerea (16). Furthermore, the diagnosis of this pathogen is a simple and expedient process using conventional microcopy and culture techniques.

As shown here, improved screening has demonstrated higher-than-expected rates of occurrence of organisms, particularly the Mollicutes, in the cervices of women attending sexual-health clinics. These mPCR assays will facilitate further clarification of the significance of these organisms in genital infections, distinguishing pathogens from commensals. Ultimately, the improvement of the diagnosis of cervicitis and other genital infections will guide the use of appropriate interventions targeted against specific pathogens. Efficacious treatment of cervicitis has important implications for the reduction of gynecologic infections and risk to fetal development, for the control of sexually transmitted diseases, and for improved reproductive health at the public health level.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all staff at the Short Street Sexual Health Clinic, St George Hospital, for collection of samples, and we acknowledge the assistance of scientists at the Virology Diagnostic Laboratory (SEALS), Prince of Wales Hospital.

Partial financial support was provided by the HARP Unit, SESIAHS, National Health and Medical Research, and Novartis.

Potential conflicts of interest: J.L. was partially supported by a Novartis research scholarship.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 28 September 2008.
    • Returned for modification 12 November 2008.
    • Accepted 13 February 2009.
  • Copyright © 2009 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Anagrius, C., B. Loré, and J. S. Jensen. 2005. Mycoplasma genitalium: prevalence, clinical significance, and transmission. Sex. Transm. Infect.81:458-462.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Barnes, C. J., A. B. Alió, B. B. Cunningham, and S. F. Friedlander. 2007. Epstein-Barr virus-associated genital ulcers: an under-recognized disorder. Pediatr. Dermatol.24:130-134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Best, J. M. 1996. Laboratory diagnosis of intrauterine and perinatal virus infections. Clin. Diagn. Virol.5:121-129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Bezold, G., J. A. Politch, N. B. Kiviat, J. M. Kuypers, H. Wolff, and D. J. Anderson. 2007. Prevalence of sexually transmissible pathogens in semen from asymptomatic male infertility patients with and without leukocytospermia. Fertil. Steril.87:1087-1097.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Bradshaw, C. S., I. M. Denham, and C. K. Fairley. 2002. Characteristics of adenovirus associated urethritis. Sex. Transm. Infect.78:445-447.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Bradshaw, C. S., S. N. Tabrizi, T. R. H. Read, S. M. Garland, C. A. Hopkins, L. M. Moss, and C. K. Fairley. 2006. Etiologies of nongonococcal urethritis: bacteria, viruses, and the association with orogenital exposure. J. Infect. Dis.193:336-345.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Cheng, S. X., M. S. Chapman, L. J. Margesson, and D. Birenbaum. 2004. Genital ulcers caused by Epstein-Barr virus. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.51:824-826.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Chow, S. W., M. E. Craig, C. F. H. Jacques, B. Hall, J. Catteau, S. C. Munro, G. M. Scott, C. Camaris, C. J. McIver, and W. D. Rawlinson. 2006. Correlates of placental infection with cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19 or human herpes virus 7. J. Med. Virol.78:747-756.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Cram, L. F., M.-I. Zapata, E. C. Toy, and B. Baker III. 2002. Genitourinary infections and their association with preterm labor. Am. Fam. Physician65:241-248.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    de Jong, J. C., R. Wigand, G. Wadell, D. Keller, C. J. Muzerie, A. G. Wermenbol, and G. J. Schaap. 1981. Adenovirus 37: identification and characterization of a medically important new adenovirus type of subgroup D. J. Med. Virol.7:105-118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Debattista, J., C. M. Gazzard, R. N. Wood, J. A. Allan, J. M. Allan, A. Scarman, M. Mortlock, P. Timms, and C. L. Knox. 2004. Interaction of microbiology and pathology in women undergoing investigations for infertility. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol.12:135-145.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.
    Dimitriev, A., A. Suvorov, A. D. Shen, and Y. H. Yang. 2004. Clinical diagnosis of group B streptococci by scpB gene based PCR. Indian J. Med. Res.119(Suppl.):233-236.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Duran, N. 2003. Genital herpes infections. Mikrobiyol. Bul.37:205-213.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Enbom, M., A. Strand, K. I. Falk, and A. Linde. 2001. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus, but not human herpesvirus 8, DNA in cervical secretions from Swedish women by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Sex. Transm. Dis.28:300-306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Falk, L., H. Fredlund, and J. S. Jensen. 2005. Signs and symptoms of urethritis and cervicitis among women with or without Mycoplasma genitalium or Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex. Transm. Infect.81:73-78.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Farrell, D. J. 1999. Evaluation of AMPLICOR Neisseria gonorrhoeae PCR using cppB nested PCR and 16S rRNA PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:386-390.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Forward, K. R., and S. H. Lee. 2003. Predominance of herpes simplex virus type 1 from patients with genital herpes in Nova Scotia. Can. J. Infect. Dis.14:94-96.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Friedek, D., A. Ekiel, M. Romanik, Z. Chelmicki, B. Wiechula, I. Wilk, J. Józwiak, and G. Martirosian. 2005. Co-occurrence of urogenital mycoplasmas and group B streptococci with chlamydial cervicitis. Pol. J. Microbiol.54:253-255.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Gallup, D. G., and D. W. Cowherd. 1978. Syphilitic cervicitis. A report of a case. Obstet. Gynecol.52:12S-14S.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Gutmann, E. J. 1995. Syphilitic cervicitis simulating stage II cervical cancer. Report of two cases with cytologic findings. Am. J. Pathol.104:643-647.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    Halvorsen, J. A., T. Brevig, T. Aas, A. G. Skar, E. M. Slevolden, and H. Moi. 2006. Genital ulcers as initial manifestation of Epstein-Barr virus infection: two new cases and a review of the literarture. Acta Derm. Venereol.86:439-442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Hashemi, F. B., B. Pourakbari, and J. Z. Yazdi. 5 February 2007. Frequency of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with cervicitis in Tehran, Iran. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. doi:10.1155/2007/67014.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    Holmes, K. K., and W. E. Stamm. 1999. Lower genital tract infections in women, p. 761-781. In K. K. Holmes, P.-A. Mardh, P. F. Sparling, et al. (ed.), Sexually transmitted diseases, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
  24. 24.↵
    Jacques, J., L. Bélec, H. Moret, G. Grésenguet, J. D. Longo, N. Chomont, V. Brodard, M. Matta, O. Graesslin, and L. Andréoletti. 2006. Enterovirus RNA shedding in the genital tract of childbearing-aged women living in Central Africa. J. Med. Virol.78:591-597.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Kantakamalakul, W., P. Naksawat, R. Kanyok, and P. Puthavathana. 1999. Prevalence of type specific Epstein-Barr virus in the genital tract of genital herpes suspected patients. J. Med. Assoc. Thai.82:263-267.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Kataoka, S., T. Yamada, K. Chou, R. Nishida, M. Morikawa, M. Minami, H. Yamada, N. Sakuragi, and H. Minakami. 2006. Association between preterm birth and vaginal colonization by mycoplasmas in early pregnancy. J. Clin. Microbiol.44:51-55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Klauber, G. T., F. J. Flynn, and B. D. Altman. 1976. Congenital varicella syndrome with genitourinary anomalies. Urology8:153-156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Kong, F., Z. Ma, G. James, S. Gordon, and G. L. Gilbert. 2000. Species identification and subtyping of Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum using PCR-based assays. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:1175-1179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Kortekangas-Savolainen, O., and T. Vuorinen. 2007. Trends in herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2 infections among patients diagnosed with genital herpes in a Finnish sexually transmitted diseases clinic, 1994-2002. Sex. Transm. Dis.34:37-40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Kreiss, J., D. M. Willerford, M. Hensel, W. Emonyi, F. Plummer, J. Ndinya-Achola, P. L. Roberts, J. Hoskyn, S. Hillier, and N. Kiviat. 1994. Association between cervical inflammation and cervical shedding of human immunodeficiency virus DNA. J. Infect. Dis.170:1597-1601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.
    Lawing, L. F., S. R. Hedges, and J. R. Schwebke. 2000. Detection of trichomonas in vaginal and urine specimens from women by culture and PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:3585-3588.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    Lorenzo, C. V., and W. S. Robertson. 2005. Genital ulcerations as presenting symptom of infectious mononucleosis. J. Am. Board Fam. Pract.18:67-68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Lozovskaia, L. S., T. T. Popova, and N. S. Sidorova. 1980. On the role of virus infection in the pathogenesis of vulvovaginitis in young girls. Vopr. Virusol.2:219-224.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Lusk, M. J., and P. Konecny. 2008. Cervicitis: a review. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.21:49-55.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Marrazzo, J. M. 2005. Mucopurulent cervicitis: no longer ignored, but still misunderstood. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. America.19:333-349.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    Mathijs, J. M., W. D. Rawlinson, S. Jacobs, A. M. Bilous, J. S. Milliken, D. N. Dowton, and A. L. Cunningham. 1991. Cellular localization of human cytomegalovirus reactivation in the cervix. J. Infect. Dis.163:921-922.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    McGalie, C. E., H. A. McBride, and W. G. McCluggage. 2004. Cytomegalovirus infection of the cervix: morphological observations in five cases of a possibly under-recognised condition. J. Clin. Pathol.57:691-694.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    McIver, C. J., C. F. H. Jacques, S. S. W. Chow, S. C. Munro, G. M. Scott, J. A. Roberts, M. E. Craig, and W. D. Rawlinson. 2005. Development of multiplex PCRs for detection of common viral pathogens and agents of congenital infections. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:5102-5110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.
    Noordhoek, G. T., E. C. Wolters, M. E. J. de Jonge, and J. D. van Embden. 1991. Detection by polymerase chain reaction of Treponema pallidum DNA in cerebrospinal fluid from neurosyphilis patients before and after antibiotic treatment. J. Clin. Microbiol.29:1976-1984.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Paavonen, J., C. W. Critchlow, T. DeRouen, C. E. Stevens, N. Kiviat, R. C. Brunham, W. E. Stamm, C. C. Kuo, K. E. Hyde, L. Corey, et al. 1986. Etiology of cervical infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.154:556-564.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    Pépin, J., A.-C. Labbé, N. Khonde, S. Deslandes, M. Alary, A. Dzokoto, C. Asamoah-Adu, H. Méda, and E. Frost. 2005. Mycoplasma genitalium: an organism commonly associated with cervicitis among African sex workers. Sex. Transm. Infect.81:67-72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Persson, E., P. Eneroth, and S. Jeansson. 1988. Secretory IgA against herpes simplex virus in cervical secretions. Genitourin. Med.64:373-377.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    Qian, Y. S., W. Lv, L. H. Sui, and J. Wang. 2005. Study on the relationship between genesis and development of cervical cancer and the infection of human papillomavirus type 16/18, human herpesvirus II and cytomegalovirus. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi26:622-625.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    Qian, Z. W. 1990. Infections caused by viruses and Chlamydia trachomatis on uterine cervix. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi25:266-268.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    Schlicht, M. J., S. D. Lovrich, J. S. Sartin, P. Karpinsky, S. M. Callister, and W. A. Agger. 2004. High prevalence of genital mycoplasmas among sexually active young adults with urethritis or cervicitis symptoms in La Crosse, Wisconsin. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:4636-4640.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    Simms, I., K. Eastick, H. Mallinson, K. Thomas, R. Gokhale, P. Hay, A. Herring, and P. A. Rogers. 2003. Associations between Mycoplasma genitalium, Chlyamydia trachomatis and pelvic inflammatory diseases. Sex. Transm. Dis.79:154-156.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    Smith, K. S., S. N. Tabrizi, K. A. Fethers, J. B. Knox, C. Pearce, and S. M. Garland. 2005. Comparison of conventional testing to polymerase chain reaction in detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in indigenous women living in remote areas. Int. J. STD AIDS16:811-815.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    Sorvillo, F., L. Smith, P. Kerndt, and L. Ash. 2002. Trichomonas vaginalis, HIV, and African-Americans. Emerg. Infect. Dis.7:927-932.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.↵
    Stellrecht, K. A., A. M. Woron, N. G. Mishrik, and R. A. Venezia. 2004. Comparison of multiplex PCR assay with culture for detection of genital mycoplasmas. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:1528-1533.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    Swenson, P. D., M. S. Lowens, C. L. Celum, and J. C. Hierholzer. 1995. Adenovirus types 2, 8, and 37 associated with genital infections in patients attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. J. Clin. Microbiol.33:2728-2731.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    Swygard, H., A. C. Sena, M. M. Hobbs, and M. S. Cohen. 2004. Trichomonas: clinical manifestations, diagnosis and management. Sex. Transm. Infect.80:91-95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    Tang, J. 1993. Molecular epidemiologic investigation on HSV infection among married women at childbearing age. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi14:223-226.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    Taylor, S., S. M. Drake, M. Dedicoat, and M. J. Wood. 1998. Genital ulcers associated with acute Epstein-Barr virus infection. Sex. Transm. Infect.74:296-297.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  54. 54.↵
    Teng, L. J., S. W. Ho, H. N. Ho, S. J. Liaw, H. C. Lai, and K. T. Luh. 1995. Rapid detection and biovar differentiation of Ureaplasma urealyticum in clinical specimens by PCR. J. Form. Med. Assoc.94:396-400.
    OpenUrl
  55. 55.↵
    Thomas, R., K. F. Macsween, K. McAulay, D. Clutterbuck, R. Anderson, S. Reid, C. D. Higgins, A. J. Swerdlow, N. Harrison, H. Williams, and D. H. Crawford. 2006. Evidence of shared Epstein-Barr viral isolates between sexual partners, and low level EBV in genital secretions. J. Med. Virol.78:1204-1209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    Xu, F., M. R. Sternberg, B. J. Kottiri, G. M. McQuillan, F. K. Lee, A. J. Nahmias, S. M. Berman, and L. E. Markowitz. 2006. Trends in herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 seroprevalence in the United States. JAMA296:964-973.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    Xu, W., M. C. McDonough, and D. D. Erdman. 2000. Species-specific identification of human adenoviruses by a multiplex PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:4114-4120.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    Yliskoski, M., A. Tervahauta, S. Saarikoski, R. Mäntyjärvi, and K. Syrjänen. 1992. Clinical course of cervical human papillomavirus lesions in relation to coexistent cervical infections. Sex. Transm. Dis.19:137-139.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    Yoshida, T., M.-I. Maeda, T. Deguchi, T. Miyazawa, and H. Ishiko. 2003. Rapid detection of Mycoplasma genitalium, Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma parvum, and Ureaplasma urealyticum organisms in genitourinary samples by PCR-micotiter plate hybridization assay. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:1850-1855.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Multiplex PCR Testing Detection of Higher-than-Expected Rates of Cervical Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma, and Trichomonas and Viral Agent Infections in Sexually Active Australian Women
Christopher J. McIver, Nikolas Rismanto, Catherine Smith, Zin Wai Naing, Ben Rayner, M. Josephine Lusk, Pamela Konecny, Peter A. White, William D. Rawlinson
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 2009, 47 (5) 1358-1363; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01873-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multiplex PCR Testing Detection of Higher-than-Expected Rates of Cervical Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma, and Trichomonas and Viral Agent Infections in Sexually Active Australian Women
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Multiplex PCR Testing Detection of Higher-than-Expected Rates of Cervical Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma, and Trichomonas and Viral Agent Infections in Sexually Active Australian Women
Christopher J. McIver, Nikolas Rismanto, Catherine Smith, Zin Wai Naing, Ben Rayner, M. Josephine Lusk, Pamela Konecny, Peter A. White, William D. Rawlinson
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 2009, 47 (5) 1358-1363; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01873-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

mycoplasma
polymerase chain reaction
trichomonas
Ureaplasma
Uterine Cervicitis
Viruses

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X