Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

recA-Based PCR Assay for Accurate Differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Other Viridans Streptococci

A. Zbinden, N. Köhler, G. V. Bloemberg
A. Zbinden
University of Zurich, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Gloriastrasse 30/32, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: azbinden@imm.uzh.ch
N. Köhler
University of Zurich, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Gloriastrasse 30/32, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. V. Bloemberg
University of Zurich, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Gloriastrasse 30/32, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01450-10
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Proper identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae by conventional methods remains problematic. The discriminatory power of the 16S rRNA gene, which can be considered the “gold standard” for molecular identification, is too low to differentiate S. pneumoniae from closely related species such as Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae, Streptococcus mitis, and Streptococcus oralis in the routine clinical laboratory. A 313-bp part of recA was selected on the basis of variability within the S. mitis group, showing <95.8% interspecies homology. In addition, 6 signature nucleotides specific for S. pneumoniae were identified within the 313-bp recA fragment. We show that recA analysis is a useful tool for proper identification to species level within the S. mitis group, in particular, for pneumococci.

INTRODUCTION

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common cause of community-acquired pneumonia and is also associated with bacteremia, meningitis, otitis media, and sinusitis (34). S. pneumoniae is a member of the Streptococcus mitis group, which currently includes Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus infantis, Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus parasanguinis, Streptococcus cristatus, Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus peroris, Streptococcus australis, Streptococcus oligofermentans, and Streptococcus sinensis (21, 44).

Clinical laboratories must be able to accurately differentiate S. pneumoniae from other viridans streptococci commonly found in clinical samples to facilitate appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Discrimination of S. pneumoniae from closely related species such as S. pseudopneumoniae, S. oralis, and S. mitis remains problematic since conventional phenotypic methods like colony morphology, bile solubility, and optochin susceptibility testing, as well as commercial systems (API 20 Strep and Vitek 2; bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), do not always provide accurate identification (3, 5, 15, 18, 34) and often lead to misidentification. Moreover, sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene, a method widely used for bacterial identification to species level (4–8, 37), is not sufficiently discriminative (23). Several studies proposed the analysis of additional, more discriminative target genes like sodA (3, 24, 36), rpoB (12, 21), gdh (21, 35), and groEl (16) to differentiate species within the S. mitis group. However, an accurate differentiation from the more recently described S. pseudopneumoniae, which is closely related to S. pneumoniae, was either not demonstrated (3) or not investigated in detail (16, 35).

Other PCR-based approaches for accurate identification of S. pneumoniae rely on the detection of pneumococcal toxins or virulence factors, such as the pneumolysin (ply gene) and autolysin (lytA gene) (28, 33, 40), which are usually not present in other alpha-hemolytic streptococci. The usefulness of such assays is questionable, as false-positive results due to cross-reactivity among S. mitis, S. oralis, or S. pseudopneumoniae strains were generated (1, 3, 14, 17, 45).

Phylogenetic analysis of recA, encoding the highly conserved subunit of the bacterial recombinase, proved to be a valuable tool for bacterial species assignment (13, 30, 31, 42, 46) but has not been investigated in-depth for species differentiation of the S. mitis group.

The aim of this study was to assess recA as a gene target for proper identification of streptococci, particularly S. pneumoniae. We identified a 313-bp recA fragment that differentiates members of the S. mitis group and enables accurate assignment to species level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.Type strains of S. pneumoniae (NCTC 7465), S. mitis (NCTC 12261), and S. oralis (NCTC 11427) were obtained from the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH (DSMZ; Braunschweig, Germany). Type strains of S. pseudopneumoniae (ATCC BAA-960), S. infantis (ATCC 700779), and S. oligofermentans (LMG 21535) were obtained from the Institut Pasteur (Paris, France). Other streptococcal strains used in this study were isolated from clinical samples (blood cultures or other normally sterile body sites) in our laboratory: (i) 11 isolates collected from January to April 2009 and (ii) 20 isolates previously analyzed (5). Streptococcal strains were routinely cultured on sheep blood agar. Phenotypic characterization included colony morphology, susceptibility to optochin, bile solubility, and capsular serotyping (National Centre for Invasive Pneumococci, Institute for Infectious Diseases, University Bern, Bern, Switzerland).

recA sequence analysis.DNA was extracted from the cultures as follows. A loopful of bacteria was suspended in 500 μl 0.9% NaCl and incubated by shaking at 80°C for 10 min. After centrifugation, the pellet was resuspended in 200 μl of InstaGene matrix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and incubated at 56°C for 2 h and subsequently at 95°C for 10 min. The mixture was centrifuged and the supernatant was used as the template for PCR.

For amplification, primers recA 2F [5′-GCCTT(T/C)ATCGATGC(C/T/G)GA(G/A)CA-3′] and recA 5R [5′-GTTTCCGG(G/A)TT(A/T/G)CC(G/A)AACAT-3′] were used. PCR cycling parameters included an initial denaturation for 5 min at 95°C; 40 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 50°C, and 1 min at 72°C; and a final extension for 10 min at 72°C. Five microliters of the DNA extract was used for amplification in a total volume of 50 μl containing 1.25 U of FastStart Taq DNA polymerase (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) and the appropriate buffer. Amplicons were purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen AG, Hombrechtikon, Switzerland) and were sequenced with forward primer recA 2F and reverse primer recA 5R by use of a BigDye kit and an automatic DNA sequencer (ABI Prism 3100 genetic analyzer; Applied Biosystems, Zug, Switzerland). The sequences were edited using the software program Megalign Lasergene (version 7; DNAStar Inc., Madison, WI). Distances of the recA sequences were calculated by using Smartgene software (Zug, Switzerland). Multiple alignment of the sequences was performed with the Clustal V program (20) (Megalign Lasergene, version 7), and construction of a phylogenetic tree was performed with the neighbor-joining method (38).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.The recA sequences of strains S. pneumoniae NCTC 7465T, S. mitis NCTC 12261T, S. oralis NCTC 11427T, S. pseudopneumoniae ATCC BAA-960T, S. infantis ATCC 700779T, S. oligofermentans LMG 21535T, and clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae have been group deposited in GenBank under BankIt 1363616 (with individual numbers HM572273, HM572274, HM572275, HM572276, HM572277, HM572278, HM572279, HM572280, HM572281, HM572282, HM572283, HM572284, HM572285, HM572286, HM572287, HM572288, and HM572289).

RESULTS

Selection of a hypervariable recA fragment for differentiation of Streptococcus mitis group members.To identify a small hypervariable region suitable for differentiation and efficient PCR amplification, we aligned complete Streptococcus recA sequences available in GenBank (accession numbers are given in parentheses), e.g., Streptococcus pyogenes (NC_009332), S. pneumoniae (NC_008533), S. gordonii (CP000725), S. parasanguinis (AF069745), S. sanguinis (CP000387), Streptococcus mutans (NC_004350), and Streptococcus agalactiae (NC_004116). recA genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (NC_002516) and Escherichia coli (NC_002695) were used as outlier sequences. An internal 313-bp recA fragment including hypervariable regions was selected for amplification with consensus recA PCR primers 2F and 5R (see Materials and Methods). This region corresponds to Escherichia coli recA positions 294 to 606 (NC_002695 [19]).

Homology analysis of recA within Streptococcus mitis group.Phylogenetic analysis of the 313-bp recA fragment of the S. mitis group strains was made to determine its differentiating ability (Fig. 1A). recA sequences were generated from S. mitis group type strains (i.e., S. pneumoniae NCTC 7465T, S. mitis NCTC 12261T, S. oralis NCTC 11427T, S. pseudopneumoniae ATCC BAA-960T, S. infantis ATCC 700779T, and S. oligofermentans LMG 21535T) or were obtained from published sequences from GenBank (S. parasanguinis, accession number AF069745; S. gordonii, accession number CP000725, S. sanguinis, accession number CP000387). Partial recA sequence analysis revealed homologies of <95.8% between species (Table 1).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Homology analysis of recA (313-bp fragment) within the Streptococcus mitis group. (A) Phylogenetic tree of 313-bp recA sequences of Streptococcus mitis group strains. Validated recA sequences of S. peroris, S. australis, S. cristatus, and S. sinensis were not represented in GenBank. Bootstrap values were calculated from 1,000 trees; only values exceeding 50% are shown. (B) Phylogenetic tree of 313-bp recA sequences of Streptococcus type strains and Streptococcus clinical isolates (n = 20). Bootstrap values were calculated from 1,000 trees; only values exceeding 50% are shown.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Homology analysis of partial recA of Streptococcus sp. type strains

Intraspecies variability of Streptococcus pneumoniae recA.A set of 11 published recA sequences of S. pneumoniae strains available from GenBank (CP000410 [29], NC_008533 [29], AE005672 [41], CP001015 [11], NC_011072 [11], AE007317 [22], NC_003098 [22], CP001033 [10], NC_010582 [10], NC_003028 [41], FM211187 [9]) and 11 recA sequences obtained from accurately assigned S. pneumoniae clinical isolates from our laboratory were analyzed for homology to determine the intraspecies variability in the recA fragment sequence. The 22 sequences showed >99.7% identity.

Proof of principle: identification of viridans streptococci on the basis of sequence analysis of partial recA fragment.From 20 clinical isolates of viridans streptococci, previously unidentifiable to species level by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and with the API 20 Strep system (bioMérieux) (5), the 313-bp recA fragment was amplified and analyzed for sequence homology. For each isolate, a sequence homology of ≤95.5% to the recA sequence of the S. pneumoniae type strain was observed (Table 2). For 12 isolates (numbers 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, and 20), recA analysis yielded an assignment to species level (Table 2). recA sequence similarities to the best taxon ranged from 95.5% to 99.0%, with a difference of ≥1.0% to the next best taxon. For the other eight isolates (numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, and 17), best matches were observed with S. oralis/S. oligofermentans and S. mitis/S. pseudopneumoniae, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

recA sequence-based identification of viridans streptococcal clinical isolatesa

A combined phylogenetic analysis of the recA sequences of the clinical isolates and type strains showed two major clusters: one containing the type strains of S. mitis, S. pneumoniae, and S. pseudopneumoniae and the other containing the type strains of S. oralis and S. oligofermentans (Fig. 1B). Within the S. mitis/S. pneumoniae/S. pseudopneumoniae cluster, the lineage containing the S. pneumoniae type strain branched off into a tight subcluster.

Signature nucleotides in Streptococcus pneumoniae recA.The recA sequences of type strains S. pneumoniae NCTC 7465, S. pseudopneumoniae ATCC BAA-960, S. mitis NCTC 12261, S. oralis NCTC 11427, and all clinical isolates used in this study (n = 31) and published recA sequences of S. pneumoniae from GenBank (n = 11) were aligned to detect specific positions within the 313-bp recA fragment that distinguished S. pneumoniae (molecular signatures). The alignment showed 6 bp specific for S. pneumoniae at positions 97, 160, 199, 247, 250, and 280 (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Signature nucleotides specific for Streptococcus pneumoniae observed in 313-bp recA fragmenta

DISCUSSION

Accurate identification to species level of S. mitis group members is of clinical importance, since this group contains pathogens, e.g., S. pneumoniae, and commensals of the human oral cavity, such as S. mitis and S. oralis (34). In view of increasing resistance to penicillin and macrolide antibiotics (2, 34), proper identification of viridans streptococci is important for antimicrobial therapy. Differentiation between S. pneumoniae and S. pseudopneumoniae is of relevance, as those isolates are assumed to be involved in the exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (25).

We have selected a 313-bp recA fragment that shows a significant variability among the S. mitis group members (Fig. 1; Table 1) and identified molecular signatures confirming accurate identification of pneumococci (Table 3). Implementation of the presented recA PCR assay in routine laboratory diagnostics is facilitated by the fact that a small part of a single gene is sufficient for accurate assignment of S. pneumoniae.

For assignment to species level using analysis of housekeeping genes, e.g., recA, approved criteria such as those for the 16S rRNA gene (5) are not available. Sequence homologies of more than 94% to 95% with a reference sequence was proposed to be appropriate for identification to species level for housekeeping genes such as rpoB (26, 32) or recA (43). This is in agreement with our data: most species showed sequence identity of more than 95.5% to the best taxon match, with a demarcation of ≥1.0% to the next homologous taxon (Table 2).

As proof of principle, we retrospectively analyzed a number of clinical isolates (n = 20) which remained unidentified to species level by phenotypic methods and 16S rRNA gene sequencing in routine diagnostics (5). For all isolates investigated, differentiation from S. pneumoniae was achieved by partial recA sequence analysis (≤95.5% sequence similarity) and from nucleotide signatures (Table 3). Twelve strains were identified to species level and eight strains were assigned to S. oralis/S. oligofermentans (n = 6) and S. mitis/S. pseudopneumoniae (n = 2), respectively. A close relation of S. oligofermentans to S. oralis was previously observed by analysis of the groEL gene (16). However, 16S rRNA gene analysis can accurately differentiate S. oligofermentans and S. oralis (data not shown). Despite a recA sequence similarity of 95.8% between the type strains of S. mitis and S. pseudopneumoniae, accurate differentiation between these species was not shown for two clinical isolates. Thus, in routine diagnostics, recA analysis is a valuable tool for identification of pneumococci, but limitations on discrimination of other members of the S. mitis group were observed.

As described earlier by analysis of other targets (24, 27, 35, 36), we observed heterogeneity within the S. mitis and S. oralis cluster (Fig. 1B) but a tight homogeneity of the S. pneumoniae strains. The hypothesis of a common ancestor of S. mitis, S. pneumoniae, and S. pseudopneumoniae proposed previously (27) is supported by our data. Our results show that the heterogeneity of S. oralis and S. mitis strains (Fig. 1B; Table 2) as well as the homogeneity of S. pneumoniae strains occurs not only in reference strains (35) but also in clinical isolates.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the laboratory technicians for their dedicated help. We thank Erik C. Boettger for constructive discussions and continuous support.

The study was supported by the University of Zurich.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 16 July 2010.
    • Returned for modification 31 August 2010.
    • Accepted 30 November 2010.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 8 December 2011.
  • Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Abdeldaim G.,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Is quantitative PCR for the pneumolysin (ply) gene useful for detection of pneumococcal lower respiratory tract infection? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15:565–570.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Alcaide F.,
    2. et al
    . 2001. In vitro activities of the new ketolide HMR 3647 (telithromycin) in comparison with those of eight other antibiotics against viridans group streptococci isolated from blood of neutropenic patients with cancer. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:624–626.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Arbique J. C.,
    2. et al
    . 2004. Accuracy of phenotypic and genotypic testing for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and description of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae sp. nov. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:4686–4696.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Boettger E. C.
    1996. Approaches for identification of microorganisms. ASM News 61:247–250.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bosshard P. P.,
    2. Abels S.,
    3. Altwegg M.,
    4. Boettger E. C.,
    5. Zbinden R.
    . 2004. Comparison of conventional and molecular methods for identification of aerobic catalase-negative gram-positive cocci in the clinical laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:2065–2073.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bosshard P. P.,
    2. Abels S.,
    3. Zbinden R.,
    4. Boettger E. C.,
    5. Altwegg M.
    . 2003. Ribosomal DNA sequencing for identification of aerobic gram-positive rods in the clinical laboratory (an 18-month evaluation). J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4134–4140.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bosshard P. P.,
    2. et al
    . 2006. 16S rRNA gene sequencing versus the API 20 NE system and the VITEK 2 ID-GNB card for identification of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria in the clinical laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:1359–1366.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Clarridge J. E. III
    . 2004. Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17:840–862.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Croucher N. J.,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Role of conjugative elements in the evolution of the multidrug-resistant pandemic clone Streptococcus pneumoniae Spain23F ST81. J. Bacteriol. 191:1480–1489.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ding F.,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Genome evolution driven by host adaptations results in a more virulent and antimicrobial-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 14. BMC Genomics 10:158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Dopazo J.,
    2. et al
    . 2001. Annotated draft genomic sequence from a Streptococcus pneumoniae type 19F clinical isolate. Microb. Drug Resist. 7:99–125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Drancourt M.,
    2. Roux V.,
    3. Fournier P. E.,
    4. Raoult D.
    . 2004. rpoB gene sequence-based identification of aerobic Gram-positive cocci of the genera Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Gemella, Abiotrophia, and Granulicatella. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:497–504.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Eisen J. A.
    1995. The RecA protein as a model molecule for molecular systematic studies of bacteria: comparison of trees of recAs and 16S rRNAs from the same species. J. Mol. Evol. 41:1105–1123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. El Aila N. A.,
    2. et al
    . 2010. The development of a 16S rRNA gene based PCR for the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and comparison with four other species specific PCR assays. BMC Infect. Dis. 10:104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Facklam R.
    2002. What happened to the streptococci: overview of taxonomic and nomenclature changes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:613–630.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Glazunova O. O.,
    2. Raoult D.,
    3. Roux V.
    . 2009. Partial sequence comparison of the rpoB, sodA, groEL and gyrB genes within the genus Streptococcus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59:2317–2322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Greiner O.,
    2. et al
    . 2001. Quantitative detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae in nasopharyngeal secretions by real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3129–3134.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Haanpera M.,
    2. Jalava J.,
    3. Huovinen P.,
    4. Meurman O.,
    5. Rantakokko-Jalava K.
    . 2007. Identification of alpha-hemolytic streptococci by pyrosequencing the 16S rRNA gene and by use of VITEK 2. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:762–770.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hayashi T.,
    2. et al
    . 2001. Complete genome sequence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 and genomic comparison with a laboratory strain K-12. DNA Res. 8:11–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Higgins D. G.,
    2. Bleasby A. J.,
    3. Fuchs R.
    . 1992. CLUSTAL V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:189–191.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Hoshino T.,
    2. Fujiwara T.,
    3. Kilian M.
    . 2005. Use of phylogenetic and phenotypic analyses to identify nonhemolytic streptococci isolated from bacteremic patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:6073–6085.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Hoskins J.,
    2. et al
    . 2001. Genome of the bacterium Streptococcus pneumoniae strain R6. J. Bacteriol. 183:5709–5717.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kawamura Y.,
    2. Hou X. G.,
    3. Sultana F.,
    4. Miura H.,
    5. Ezaki T.
    . 1995. Determination of 16S rRNA sequences of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus gordonii and phylogenetic relationships among members of the genus Streptococcus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:406–408.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kawamura Y.,
    2. Whiley R. A.,
    3. Shu S. E.,
    4. Ezaki T.,
    5. Hardie J. M.
    . 1999. Genetic approaches to the identification of the mitis group within the genus Streptococcus. Microbiology 145(Pt 9):2605–2613.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Keith E. R.,
    2. Podmore R. G.,
    3. Anderson T. P.,
    4. Murdoch D. R.
    . 2006. Characteristics of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae isolated from purulent sputum samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:923–927.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Khamis A.,
    2. Raoult D.,
    3. La Scola B.
    . 2005. Comparison between rpoB and 16S rRNA gene sequencing for molecular identification of 168 clinical isolates of Corynebacterium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:1934–1936.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kilian M.,
    2. et al
    . 2008. Evolution of Streptococcus pneumoniae and its close commensal relatives. PLoS One 3:e2683.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Lahti E.,
    2. et al
    . 2006. Pneumolysin polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia and empyema in children. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 25:783–789.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Lanie J. A.,
    2. et al
    . 2007. Genome sequence of Avery's virulent serotype 2 strain D39 of Streptococcus pneumoniae and comparison with that of unencapsulated laboratory strain R6. J. Bacteriol. 189:38–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Lloyd A. T.,
    2. Sharp P. M.
    . 1993. Evolution of the recA gene and the molecular phylogeny of bacteria. J. Mol. Evol. 37:399–407.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Mahenthiralingam E.,
    2. et al
    . 2000. DNA-based diagnostic approaches for identification of Burkholderia cepacia complex, Burkholderia vietnamiensis, Burkholderia multivorans, Burkholderia stabilis, and Burkholderia cepacia genomovars I and III. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3165–3173.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Mellmann A.,
    2. et al
    . 2006. Sequencing and staphylococci identification. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12:333–336.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Messmer T. O.,
    2. et al
    . 2004. Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction assays for specificity in the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 49:249–254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Murray P.,
    2. et al
    . (ed.). 2007. Manual of clinical microbiology, vol. 1, 9th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  35. 35.↵
    1. Nielsen X. C.,
    2. Justesen U. S.,
    3. Dargis R.,
    4. Kemp M.,
    5. Christensen J. J.
    . 2009. Identification of clinically relevant nonhemolytic streptococci on the basis of sequence analysis of 16S-23S intergenic spacer region and partial gdh gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:932–939.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Poyart C.,
    2. Quesne G.,
    3. Coulon S.,
    4. Berche P.,
    5. Trieu-Cuot P.
    . 1998. Identification of streptococci to species level by sequencing the gene encoding the manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:41–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Rogall T.,
    2. Flohr T.,
    3. Boettger E. C.
    . 1990. Differentiation of Mycobacterium species by direct sequencing of amplified DNA. J. Gen. Microbiol. 136:1915–1920.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Saitou N.,
    2. Nei M.
    . 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406–425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.
    Reference deleted.
  40. 40.↵
    1. Smith M. D.,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae infections in adults with bacteremia and community-acquired pneumonia: clinical comparison of pneumococcal PCR and urinary antigen detection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:1046–1049.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Tettelin H.,
    2. et al
    . 2001. Complete genome sequence of a virulent isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Science 293:498–506.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Thompson C. C.,
    2. et al
    . 2004. Use of recA as an alternative phylogenetic marker in the family Vibrionaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54:919–924.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Thompson F. L.,
    2. et al
    . 2005. Phylogeny and molecular identification of vibrios on the basis of multilocus sequence analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:5107–5115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Tong H.,
    2. Gao X.,
    3. Dong X.
    . 2003. Streptococcus oligofermentans sp. nov., a novel oral isolate from caries-free humans. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53:1101–1104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Whatmore A. M.,
    2. et al
    . 2000. Genetic relationships between clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus oralis, and Streptococcus mitis: characterization of “atypical” pneumococci and organisms allied to S. mitis harboring S. pneumoniae virulence factor-encoding genes. Infect. Immun. 68:1374–1382.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Zeigler D. R.
    2003. Gene sequences useful for predicting relatedness of whole genomes in bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53:1893–1900.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
recA-Based PCR Assay for Accurate Differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Other Viridans Streptococci
A. Zbinden, N. Köhler, G. V. Bloemberg
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Feb 2011, 49 (2) 523-527; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01450-10

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
recA-Based PCR Assay for Accurate Differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Other Viridans Streptococci
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
recA-Based PCR Assay for Accurate Differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Other Viridans Streptococci
A. Zbinden, N. Köhler, G. V. Bloemberg
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Feb 2011, 49 (2) 523-527; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01450-10
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X