Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

CHROMagar Yersinia, a New Chromogenic Agar for Screening of Potentially Pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica Isolates in Stools

Nicolas Renaud, Laetitia Lecci, René J. Courcol, Michel Simonet, Olivier Gaillot
Nicolas Renaud
Lille University Medical Center, Lille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laetitia Lecci
Lille University Medical Center, Lille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
René J. Courcol
Lille University Medical Center, Lille, FranceINSERM U1019, Lille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michel Simonet
Lille University Medical Center, Lille, FranceINSERM U1019, Lille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier Gaillot
Lille University Medical Center, Lille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02903-12
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

CHROMagar Yersinia (CAY) is a new chromogenic medium for the presumptive detection of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica in stools. Based on a comparative analysis of 1,494 consecutive stools from hospitalized patients, CAY was found to be just as sensitive as the reference medium (cefsulodin-irgasan-novobiocin agar) but was significantly more specific and had a very low false-positive rate. CAY reduces the workload (and thus costs) for stool analysis and can therefore be recommended for routine laboratory use.

INTRODUCTION

In temperate and cold areas of the world, Yersinia enterocolitica is the third most common human bacterial enteropathogen (1). Although it mainly causes sporadic cases of gastroenteritis, outbreaks have been reported (2, 3). The species is subdivided into six biovars (1A, 1B, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and can also be separated into serogroups on the basis of the somatic (O) antigens, some of which are common to two or more biovars (2). However, the pathogenicity of the various serogroups of Y. enterocolitica is heterogeneous. When considering the 30 O serogroups defined by Wauters and coworkers (4, 5), most of the strains isolated from humans with diarrhea come from serogroups O:3, O:5,27, O:8 and O:9 (2). Despite the publication of a controversial report by Australian microbiologists 10 years ago (6), biovar 1A strains are generally considered to be nonpathogenic because they lack (in contrast to biovars 1B and 2 to 5) the pYV plasmid that is essential for bacterial virulence (2). This 70-kb extrachromosomal genetic element encodes (i) the Ysc type III secretion system that injects the Yop protein effectors that interfere with the eukaryotic host's immune signaling pathways (7) and (ii) the YadA adhesion/invasion protein that facilitates bacterial colonization of the intestinal mucosa (8).

Isolation of Y. enterocolitica from stools is fastidious since it is frequently outgrown by other Enterobacteriaceae. Partially selective media containing antimicrobial cocktails have been proposed in order to facilitate Y. enterocolitica recovery from fecal specimens, and the semiselective cefsulodin-irgasan-novobiocin (CIN) agar developed by Schiemann more than 30 years ago (9) is still the medium most widely used by medical microbiologists for this purpose. However, observation of the colony morphology (a red “bull's-eye” surrounded by a clear border, unfortunately not strictly specific for Y. enterocolitica) does not enable one to distinguish between pathogenic and nonpathogenic Y. enterocolitica isolates. This discrimination requires characterization of the biochemical properties associated with avirulence (i.e., esculin hydrolysis and pyrazinamidase activity, which are features of biovar 1A [10], or colony-PCR detection of pYV-encoded proteins [11]). With a view to selecting virulent Y. enterocolitica (VYE) colonies, Fukushima (12) developed VYE agar by adding esculin and ferric citrate to CIN. However, it was found that black esculin hydrolysis products produced by non-Yersinia colonies diffused within the medium and masked potentially virulent, esculin-negative Y. enterocolitica colonies (13).

Culture media incorporating enzyme substrates linked to heat-stable, water-soluble, indolyl chromophores (14) have become widely used in clinical laboratories. The cleavage of the substrate by specific enzymes in the target microorganism releases the chromophore and thus colors the growing microbial colonies. Hence, the use of chromogenic agars can eliminate the need for subcultures and can provide presumptive identification of a chosen microorganism. This approach shortens the turnaround time for microbial diagnosis, reduces the analytical workload, and generates cost savings relative to conventional methods for the isolation and identification of bacterial pathogens. A Yersinia enterocolitica chromogenic medium (YeCM) was reported by Weagant (13) in 2008 for quality control in the food industry. In fact, YeCM was shown to be just as sensitive as CIN (13) and was well suited for rapid detection of virulent Y. enterocolitica in the tonsils of slaughtered pigs (15), the main animal reservoir of strains that are pathogenic in humans (1, 2). However, to the best of our knowledge, YeCM has not been evaluated in a clinical microbiology setting in humans. CHROMagar Yersinia (CAY) is a new, selective, chromogenic medium for the presumptive identification of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica colonies. The latter are colored mauve after 48 h of incubation at 28°C (the species' optimal growth temperature), whereas nonpathogenic strains of the species and occasional isolates of other Enterobacteriaceae grow as metallic blue colonies after as little as 24 h of incubation at the same temperature. In the present study, we evaluated the performance of CAY relative to the CIN reference medium for the routine detection of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in stools from patients with diarrhea.

(This work was presented as a poster at the 112th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, 16 to 19 June 2012, San Francisco, CA.)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Culture media.The proprietary product CAY was provided for evaluation by CHROMagar Microbiology (Paris, France) as prepared and included 85-mm plates containing 20 ml of colorless, transparent medium. As recommended by the manufacturer, CAY plates were stored at 4°C in the dark and used within 8 weeks. CIN and Mueller-Hinton (MH) media were purchased as commercially prepared plates (Oxoid, Dardilly, France). All plates were incubated in air at 28°C in the dark. Tryptic soy broth (Oxoid) was used for liquid cultures.

Stock isolates.Eighty-one stock Yersinia strains (representing 8 species) were used in this study (Table 1). There were 40 Y. enterocolitica strains.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Yersinia stock isolates used in the present study

Medium fertility.The capacity of CAY and CIN to grow Y. enterocolitica stock isolates was compared to that of nonselective MH medium. For this purpose, 100 μl of bacterial suspensions containing ca. 200 CFU, prepared from each of the 40 isolates, was plated simultaneously on the CAY, CIN, and MH media and then incubated at 28°C for 48 h before colonies were counted. The percentage of growth on CAY and CIN compared to MH was calculated as the ratio (×100) of the number of colonies on CAY or CIN to the number of colonies on MH.

Clinical samples.Between November 2011 and March 2012, we analyzed all diarrheic stools from inpatients and outpatients (one sample per patient) at Lille University Medical Center. A standardized sample volume (50 μl of liquid stool or stool liquefied in saline solution) was streaked onto CAY and CIN plates. All plates were incubated in the dark at 28°C in air for 48 h. All suspect colonies (i.e., mauve colonies measuring 1 to 2 mm in diameter on CAY and red “bull's-eye” colonies on CIN) were identified.

Bacterial identification.Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) was performed on a Microflex system (Brüker Daltonics, Wissembourg, France), as previously described (16) for the identification of bacterial colonies. When MALDI-TOF MS did not provide sufficient interspecies discrimination, identification was performed by colony-PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA genes using the fD1/rp2 primers designed by Weisburg et al. (17). All clinical isolates of Y. enterocolitica were screened for the yadA gene, using the PCR assay described by Blais and Phillippe (18).

A protocol reported by Robins-Browne was adapted for Y. enterocolitica biotyping (19). Briefly, we studied esculin and Tween 80 hydrolysis, nitrate reductase and pyrazinamidase activities, indole production from tryptophan, and d-xylose use. Pathogenic (yadA-positive) Y. enterocolitica isolates were serotyped by slide agglutination using O:3, O:5, O:8, O:9, and O:27 (SIFIN, Berlin, Germany).

Statistical analyses.Intermedium differences in fertility and specificity were evaluated with a Wilcoxon test and a Yates-corrected χ2 test, respectively. The threshold for statistical significance was set to P < 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We first evaluated CAY's ability to support the growth of Yersinia spp. All 40 Y. enterocolitica strains grew on CAY; the 32 pathogenic strains (biovars 1B and 2 to 5) produced colorless colonies after 24 h of incubation and mauve colonies (1 to 2 mm in diameter) after 48 h (Fig. 1A). In contrast, the 8 nonpathogenic (biovar 1A) strains grew as metallic blue colonies (1 to 3 mm in diameter) after both 24 and 48 h of incubation (Fig. 1B). Next, we compared the growth of the 32 non-1A strains on CAY and CIN, using nonselective MH agar as a reference (100% growth). Table 2 shows that CAY was slightly less inhibitory (P = 0.06) than CIN for in vitro growth of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica.

Fig 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1

Colonies of Y. enterocolitica on CHROMagar Yersinia after a 48-h incubation at 28°C. Note the growth of both a pathogenic isolate (A; mauve colonies) and a nonpathogenic isolate (B; metallic blue colonies).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Growth of Yersinia enterocolitica stock isolates on CHROMagar Yersinia and CIN agar compared to MH agar

The genus Yersinia includes another enteropathogenic species (Y. pseudotuberculosis) and other species seldom isolated from human stools but which are generally regarded as nonpathogenic (Y. frederiksenii, Y. kristensenii, Y. intermedia, Y. mollaretii, Y. aldovae, and Y. bercovieri). None of the 19 tested Y. pseudotuberculosis strains grew on CAY. Similarly, Y. kristensenii (n = 5), Y. aldovae (n = 4), Y. intermedia (n = 3), and Y. mollaretii (n = 3) did not grow on CAY. In contrast, Y. frederiksenii (n = 3) and Y. bercovieri (n = 4) yielded colonies that looked the same as nonpathogenic (metallic blue) and pathogenic (mauve) Y. enterocolitica colonies, respectively (Table 1).

CAY and CIN agar were then compared prospectively for the routine isolation and presumptive identification of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in a medical laboratory. In all, 1,494 consecutive diarrheic stool samples were plated in parallel on the two media. Cultures were examined by a single operator after 48 h. From the 1,494 stools analyzed, we isolated a total of six pathogenic (yadA-positive and esculin- and pyrazinamidase-negative) isolates on CAY, which all grew as typical mauve colonies. These pathogenic isolates variously belonged to bioserovars 4/O:3 (n = 2), 2/O:9 (n = 1), and 5/O:3 (n = 3). There were 14 false positives on CAY, corresponding to colonies of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (number of stool specimens [n] = 9), Shewanella putrefaciens (n = 1), Y. bercovieri (n = 1), and Brevundimonas terrae (a species previously unknown in this setting; n = 3). In contrast, culture on CIN revealed 12 typical Y. enterocolitica isolates, of which six were the yadA-positive, esculin- and pyrazinamidase-negative isolates also identified on CAY. The remaining six were yadA negative, esculin and pyrazinamidase positive, belonged to biovar 1A, and had grown on CAY as blue colonies; they had been isolated in a clinical setting that did not suggest yersiniosis. Besides those six nonpathogenic Y. enterocolitica isolates, 137 false-positive results were observed on CIN, which corresponded to colonies of Citrobacter freundii (n = 88), Providencia stuartii (n = 23), Providencia rettgeri (n = 12), Aeromonas spp. (n = 12), Acinetobacter johnsonii (n = 1), and Achromobacter xylosoxidans (n = 1).

Here, we found that the new chromogenic medium CAY is well suited to routine laboratory screening for pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in stools (Fig. 2). Compared to CIN, CAY did not detect nonpathogenic isolates, thus limiting the risk of inappropriate antibiotic prescription. Although the composition of CAY is a trade secret held by CHROMagar, a pathogenic (pYV-positive) wild-type strain, 8081, and its isogenic, plasmid-cured (i.e., nonpathogenic) derivative both yielded mauve colonies on the medium (data not shown). This finding indicates that the chromogenic reaction targets chromosomally encoded Y. enterocolitica enzymes. By studying almost 1,500 consecutive stool samples, we found that CAY's specificity (99%) was significantly greater than that of CIN (90.4%) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, CAY had an approximately 10-fold-lower false-positive rate than CIN. Whereas the use of CIN agar requires complementary tests to establish whether Y. enterocolitica isolates are pathogenic or not, the CAY medium detects pathogenic Y. enterocolitica directly and generates few false positives (since the main species S. maltophilia and Y. bercovieri are infrequently encountered in clinical stool analysis). Six pathogenic Y. enterocolitica isolates (0.4% of all stool specimens) were identified by use of CAY and CIN media. This low incidence most likely reflects the time of year of stool collection (November to March), since the occurrence of human Y. enterocolitica infection is known to be higher during summer and fall. The equal number of isolates suggests that CAY and CIN have the same sensitivity. However, our preliminary experiments showed that CAY was slightly less inhibitory than CIN for the growth of pure suspensions of Y. enterocolitica.

Fig 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2

Colonies plated on cefsulodin-irgasan-novobiocin (CIN) agar (left) and CHROMagar Yersinia (CAY; right) from a stool specimen containing Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, and pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. On CAY, mauve colonies of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica (white arrowheads) can be readily distinguished from blue-green colonies of C. freundii (black arrowheads) after 48 h of incubation at 28°C.

According to a recent report from the European Union (1), the other enteropathogenic Yersinia species (Y. pseudotuberculosis) causes approximately 100-fold fewer human infections than Y. enterocolitica does. This disparity might be related not only to epidemiological differences between the two microorganisms but also to less efficient recovery of Y. pseudotuberculosis from feces leading to underestimation of the incidence of human pseudotuberculosis. Indeed, it has been shown that the growth of some Y. pseudotuberculosis serotypes (particularly II and III) was impaired on CIN agar (20, 21) due to the presence of cefsulodin in this selective culture medium (20). This is also a weakness of CAY, since none of the tested Y. pseudotuberculosis strains grew on this new medium. It would be worth reformulating the medium so that it would be selective for both enteropathogenic Yersinia species. Such a modification would entail a new evaluation of the medium.

In conclusion, the new chromogenic medium CAY is just as sensitive as CIN agar but is significantly more specific. It can be recommended for the routine screening of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in human diarrheic stools.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank S. Bonacorsi and P. Vincent for their kind gift of clinical Yersinia isolates.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 29 October 2012.
    • Returned for modification 8 December 2012.
    • Accepted 26 January 2013.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 30 January 2013.
  • Copyright © 2013, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Anonymous. 2011. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2009. EFSA J. 9:2090. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2090.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bottone EJ
    . 1999. Yersinia enterocolitica: overview and epidemiologic correlates. Microbes Infect. 1:323–333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Galindo CL,
    2. Rosenzweig JA,
    3. Kirtley ML,
    4. Chopra AK
    . 2011. Pathogenesis of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in human yersiniosis. J. Pathog. 2011:182051. doi:10.4061/2011/182051.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wauters G,
    2. Le Minor L,
    3. Chalon AM
    . 1971. Antigènes somatiques et flagellaires des Yersinia enterocolitica. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 120:631–642.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wauters G,
    2. Le Minor L,
    3. Chalon AM,
    4. Lassen J
    . 1972. Supplément au schéma antigénique de Yersinia enterocolitica. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 122:951–956.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tennant SM,
    2. Grant TH,
    3. Robins-Browne RM
    . 2003. Pathogenicity of Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1A. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 38:127–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Marenne MN,
    2. Mota LJ,
    3. Cornelis GR
    . 2004. The pYV plasmid and the Ysc-Yop type III secretion system, p 319–348. In Carniel E, Hinnebusch BJ (ed), Yersinia molecular and cellular biology. Horizon Bioscience, Wymondham, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
  8. 8.↵
    1. El Tahir Y,
    2. Skurnik M
    . 2001. YadA, the multifaceted Yersinia adhesin. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 291:209–218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Schiemann DA
    . 1979. Synthesis of a selective agar medium for Yersinia enterocolitica. Can. J. Microbiol. 25:1298–1304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kandolo K,
    2. Wauters G
    . 1985. Pyrazinamidase activity in Yersinia enterocolitica and related organisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 21:980–982.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fukushima H,
    2. Shimizu S,
    3. Inatsu Y
    . 2011. Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis detection in foods. J. Pathog. 2011:735308. doi:10.4061/2011/735308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Fukushima H
    . 1987. New selective agar medium for isolation of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:1068–1073.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Weagant SD
    . 2008. A new chromogenic medium for detection of potentially virulent Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Microbiol. Methods 72:185–190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Manafi M
    . 2000. New developments in chromogenic and fluorogenic media. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 60:205–218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Fondrevez M,
    2. Labbé A,
    3. Houard E,
    4. Fravalo P,
    5. Madec F,
    6. Denis M
    . 2010. A simplified method for detecting pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in slaughtered pig tonsils. J. Microbiol. Methods 83:244–249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Gaillot O,
    2. Blondiaux N,
    3. Loïez C,
    4. Wallet F,
    5. Lemaître N,
    6. Herwegh S,
    7. Courcol RJ
    . 2011. Cost-effectiveness of switch to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry for routine bacterial identification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:4412. (Letter.)
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Weisburg WG,
    2. Barns SM,
    3. Pelletier DA,
    4. Lane DJ
    . 1991. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 173:697–703.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Blais BW,
    2. Phillippe LM
    . 1995. Comparative analysis of yadA and ail polymerase chain reaction methods for virulent Yersinia enterocolitica. Food Control 6:211–214.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Robins-Browne RM
    . 1997. Yersinia enterocolitica, p 192–215. In Doyle MP, Beuchat LR, Montville TJ (ed), Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Fukushima H,
    2. Gomyoda M
    . 1986. Growth of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 3B serotype O3 inhibited on cefsulodin-irgasan-novobiocin agar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 24:116–120.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Savin C,
    2. Leclercq A,
    3. Carniel E
    . 2012. Evaluation of a single procedure allowing the isolation of enteropathogenic Yersinia along with other bacterial enteropathogens from human stools. PLoS One 7:e41176. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
CHROMagar Yersinia, a New Chromogenic Agar for Screening of Potentially Pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica Isolates in Stools
Nicolas Renaud, Laetitia Lecci, René J. Courcol, Michel Simonet, Olivier Gaillot
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2013, 51 (4) 1184-1187; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02903-12

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CHROMagar Yersinia, a New Chromogenic Agar for Screening of Potentially Pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica Isolates in Stools
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
Share
CHROMagar Yersinia, a New Chromogenic Agar for Screening of Potentially Pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica Isolates in Stools
Nicolas Renaud, Laetitia Lecci, René J. Courcol, Michel Simonet, Olivier Gaillot
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2013, 51 (4) 1184-1187; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02903-12
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X