Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Evaluation of Three Rapid Diagnostic Methods for Direct Identification of Microorganisms in Positive Blood Cultures

Raquel M. Martinez, Elizabeth R. Bauerle, Ferric C. Fang, Susan M. Butler-Wu
R. Patel, Editor
Raquel M. Martinez
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth R. Bauerle
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ferric C. Fang
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan M. Butler-Wu
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Patel
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00529-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1

    Distribution of microorganisms isolateda

    Definitive IDNo. of monomicrobial isolatesNo. of polymicrobial isolatesTotal no. of isolates (%)
    Gram-positive bacteria
        CoNS45550 (28.7)
        Staphylococcus aureus13215 (8.6)
        Enterococcus faecium9211 (6.3)
        Enterococcus faecalis707 (4.0)
        Enterococcus casseliflavus/E. gallinarum101 (0.6)
        Viridans streptococci718 (4.6)
        Streptococcus agalactiae101 (0.6)
        Streptococcus anginosus group213 (1.7)
        Streptococcus dysgalactiae (group G)101 (0.6)
        Streptococcus pneumoniae101 (0.6)
        Streptococcus pyogenes202 (1.1)
        Micrococcus spp.325 (2.9)
        Gemella haemolysans202 (1.1)
        Granulicatella adiacens112 (1.1)
        Subtotal9514109 (62.6)
    Gram-negative bacteria
        Escherichia coli23023 (13.2)
        Klebsiella pneumoniae527 (4.0)
        Enterobacter cloacae314 (2.3)
        Pseudomonas aeruginosa213 (1.7)
        Serratia marcescens123 (1.7)
        Klebsiella oxytoca022 (1.1)
        Enterobacter asburiae022 (1.1)
        Chryseobacterim indologenes112 (1.1)
        Acinetobacter ursingii112 (1.1)
        Acinetobacter baumannii complex101 (0.6)
        Burkholderia cepacia complex101 (0.6)
        Campylobacter jejuni101 (0.6)
        Citrobacter freundii011 (0.6)
        Citrobacter koseri101 (0.6)
        Haemophilus influenzae101 (0.6)
        Haemophilus parainfluenae101 (0.6)
        Morganella morganii101 (0.6)
        Pseudomonas stutzeri101 (0.6)
        Raoultella sp.101 (0.6)
        Rhizobium radiobacter011 (0.6)
        Stenotrophomonas maltophilia101 (0.6)
        Subtotal461460 (34.5)
    Yeast
        Candida parapsilosis202 (1.1)
        Candida kefyr101 (0.6)
        Saccharomyces cerevisiae101 (0.6)
        Cryptococcus neoformans101 (0.6)
        Subtotal505 (2.9)
    Total14628174
    • ↵a ID, identification; CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococcus.

  • TABLE 2

    Evaluation of QuickFISH, BC-GP, and MALDI-TOF MS for 146 monomicrobial cultures

    Definitive IDNo. of culturesNo. (%) of cultures correctly identified by:
    MALDI-TOF MS (%)QuickFISH (%)BC-GP (%)
    Genus (>1.6)Species (>1.8)
    Staphylococci5857 (98.3)51 (87.9)57 (98.3)58 (100)
        CoNSa4544 (97.8)38 (84.4)44 (97.8)45 (100)
        S. aureus1313 (100)13 (100)13 (100)13 (100)
            mecA33 (100)
    Enterococci1616 (100)16 (100)16 (100)16 (100)
        E. faecium99 (100)9 (100)9 (100)9 (100)
        E. faecalis77 (100)7 (100)7 (100)7 (100)
            vanA64 (66.7)
    Streptococci147 (50)6 (42.9)14 (100)12 (85.7)
        Viridans streptococci71 (14.3)1 (14.3)NDb (100)5 (71.4)
        S. pyogenes22 (100)2 (100)ND (100)2 (100)
        S. anginosus group22 (100)1 (50)ND (100)2 (100)
        S. pneumoniae10 (0)0 (0)ND (100)1 (100)
        S. agalactiae11 (100)1 (100)ND (100)1 (100)
        S. dysgalactiae (group G)11 (100)1 (100)ND (100)1 (100)
    Other75 (71.4)4 (57.1)7 (100)7 (100)
        Micrococcus spp.31 (33.3)1 (33.3)ND (100)ND (100)
        Gemella haemolysans22 (100)1 (50)ND (100)ND (100)
        Granulicatella adiacens11 (100)1 (100)ND (100)ND (100)
        E. casseliflavus/E. gallinarum11 (100)1 (100)ND (100)ND (100)
    Enterobacteriaceae3534 (97.1)32 (91.4)33 (94.3)—
        E. coli2322 (95.7)22 (95.7)23 (100)—
        K. pneumoniae55 (100)5 (100)3 (60)—
        E. cloacae33 (100)3 (100)ND (100)—
        C. koseri11 (100)1 (100)ND (100)—
        M. morganii11 (100)0 (0)ND (100)—
        Raoultella sp.11 (100)0 (0)ND (100)—
        S. marcescens11 (100)1 (100)ND (100)—
    Non-Enterobacteriaceae116 (54.5)5 (45.5)11 (100)—
        P. aeruginosa22 (100)2 (100)2 (100)—
        A. baumannii complex11 (100)1 (100)ND (100)—
        A. ursingii10 (0)0 (0)ND (100)—
        B. cepacia complex11 (100)1 (100)ND (100)—
        C. jejuni10 (0)0 (0)ND (100)—
        C. indologenes10 (0)0 (0)ND (100)—
        H. influenzae10 (0)0 (0)ND (100)—
        H. parainfluenzae10 (0)0 (0)ND (100)—
        P. stutzeri11 (100)0 (0)ND (100)—
        S. maltophilia11 (100)1 (100)ND (100)—
    Yeast53 (60)3 (60)5 (100)—
        C. parapsilosis21 (50)1 (50)2 (100)—
        C. kefyr11 (100)1 (100)ND (100)—
        S. cerevisiae10 (0)0 (0)ND (100)—
        C. neoformans11 (100)1 (100)ND (100)—
    Total146128 (87.7)117 (80.1)143 (97.9)93 (97.9)
    • ↵a CoNS data include the following species: S. epidermidis (37 cultures), S. hominis (4 cultures), S. haemolyticus (2 cultures), S. pasteuri (1 culture), and S. simulans (1 culture).

    • ↵b ND, not detected; —, not done.

  • TABLE 3

    Evaluation of QuickFISH, BC-GP, and MALDI-TOF MS for 13 polymicrobial blood cultures

    Blood cultureDefinitive IDGram stain resultaResult
    MALDI-TOF MSQuickFISHBC-GP
    BC245S. hominisGPCLNDbCoNSStaphylococcus sp.
    S. marcescensGNRS. marcescensND—c
    BC115C. freundiiGNRC. freundiiND—
    Micrococcus sp.NDND——
    BC31Viridans streptococciGPPCS. pneumoniaeNDStreptococcus sp.
    S. epidermidisNDND—ND
    BC44E. faecium/vanAGPPCNDNot E. faecalisE. faecium/vanA
    K. pneumoniaeNDND——
    BC3K. pneumoniaeGNRK. pneumoniaeK. pneumoniae—
    E. cloacaeGNRNDE. coli—
    BC124S. marcescensGNRS. marcescensND—
    P. aeruginosaGNRNDND—
    BC71K. oxytocaGNRNDND—
    Enterobacter asburiaeGNRE. asburiaeND—
    BC77K. oxytocaGNRNDND—
    Enterobacter asburiaeGNRE. asburiaeND—
    BC37C. indologenesGNRNDND—
    A. ursingiiGNRNDND—
    R. radiobacterGNRNDND—
    BC85dS. cohniiGPCLNDCoNSStaphylococcus sp.
    Micrococcus sp.GPCLNDNDND
    BC105dS. epidermidisGPCLNDCoNSND
    S. hominisGPCLNDCoNSStaphylococcus sp.
    E. faecium/vanANDE. faecium—E. faecium/vanA
    BC100dS. aureusGPCLS. aureusS. aureusS. aureus
    S. aureus/mecAGPCLS. aureusS. aureusS. aureus/mecA
    BC122dS. anginosus groupGPPCS. anginosus groupNot E. faecalisS. anginosus group
    Granulicatella sp.GPPCNDNot E. faecalisND
    • ↵a GNR, Gram-negative rod; GPCL, Gram-positive cocci in clusters; GPPC, Gram-positive cocci in pairs and chains.

    • ↵b ND, not detected.

    • ↵c —, not done.

    • ↵d Excluded from data analysis.

Additional Files

  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental file 1 -

      Table S1 (Pilot evaluation of the BC-GP assay for 107 aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures)

      PDF, 81K

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Three Rapid Diagnostic Methods for Direct Identification of Microorganisms in Positive Blood Cultures
Raquel M. Martinez, Elizabeth R. Bauerle, Ferric C. Fang, Susan M. Butler-Wu
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jun 2014, 52 (7) 2521-2529; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00529-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Three Rapid Diagnostic Methods for Direct Identification of Microorganisms in Positive Blood Cultures
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluation of Three Rapid Diagnostic Methods for Direct Identification of Microorganisms in Positive Blood Cultures
Raquel M. Martinez, Elizabeth R. Bauerle, Ferric C. Fang, Susan M. Butler-Wu
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jun 2014, 52 (7) 2521-2529; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00529-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X