Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mycology

Microsatellite (STRAf) Genotyping Cannot Differentiate between Invasive and Colonizing Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates

Pilar Escribano, Teresa Peláez, Emilio Bouza, Jesús Guinea
D. W. Warnock, Editor
Pilar Escribano
aClinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
bInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
cCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES CB06/06/0058), Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Teresa Peláez
aClinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
bInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
cCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES CB06/06/0058), Madrid, Spain
dMedicine Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emilio Bouza
aClinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
bInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
cCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES CB06/06/0058), Madrid, Spain
dMedicine Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jesús Guinea
aClinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
bInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
cCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES CB06/06/0058), Madrid, Spain
dMedicine Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jesús Guinea
D. W. Warnock
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02636-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Correction for Escribano et al., Microsatellite (STRAf) Genotyping Cannot Differentiate between Invasive and Colonizing Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates
    - July 25, 2016

ABSTRACT

We studied whether short tandem repeats of Aspergillus fumigatus (STRAf) can differentiate between invasive and colonizing genotypes of A. fumigatus. Of the 395 genotypes detected (n = 1,373 isolates), 50 were clusters and 24 (6% of all genotypes) involved the patients with invasive aspergillosis and those colonized with A. fumigatus, indicating that genotyping cannot discriminate between invasive and colonizing isolates.

TEXT

Diagnosing invasive aspergillosis is challenging and is based on host factors, radiological findings, and mycological criteria (1). Culture of Aspergillus species is widely used, although it is impaired by low specificity in some groups of patients, as shown by the high proportion of nonhematological patients with Aspergillus isolated from lower respiratory tract samples but no invasive disease (2, 3). Therefore, the isolation of Aspergillus fumigatus should be interpreted with caution.

A. fumigatus is a ubiquitous fungus that is able to colonize or infect patients depending on the integrity of the immune system (4); however, different degrees of virulence have been observed in clinical isolates of A. fumigatus (5, 6). Hypothetically, some isolates cause invasive aspergillosis, whereas others only colonize patients. Unfortunately, to our knowledge, the association between specific isolates and the presence of invasive aspergillosis has not been studied.

(This study was presented in part at the 24th European Congress on Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Barcelona, Spain, 10 to 13 May 2014.)

A large collection of clinical A. fumigatus sensu stricto isolates was analyzed to determine whether microsatellite (short tandem repeats of Aspergillus fumigatus [STRAf]) genotyping was able to differentiate between isolates from patients with invasive aspergillosis and isolates from colonized patients.

A total of 95 patients admitted to Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón between 2005 and 2012 and diagnosed with proven (n = 16) or probable (n = 79) invasive aspergillosis were studied. Isolates were available from all the patients, who were classified according to the revised criteria of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (1); patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) fulfilled Bulpa's criteria (7). The isolates were obtained from pulmonary (n = 82), extrapulmonary (wound [n = 3], central nervous system [n = 1], urinary tract [n = 1], and other [n = 2]), and pulmonary and extrapulmonary (central nervous system [n = 4], and wound and central nervous system [n = 1], urinary tract and central nervous system [n = 1]) specimens. Patients with asymptomatic colonization were selected as controls; we recruited a sufficiently large number of control patients (n = 141) to obtain a similar number of samples from the two groups.

A. fumigatus was isolated in 441 samples (n = 217 [49%] from patients with aspergillosis and 224 from colonized patients) that were cultured on bacterial and mycological media; A. fumigatus colonies (n = 1,373; 705 [51%] isolates from patients with invasive aspergillosis) found on the culture plates were prospectively subcultured and stored independently. Most isolates were from the lower respiratory tract (n = 1,227; 89%). All the isolates were identified to the molecular level by sequencing the β-tubulin gene and were genotyped using the STRAf assay (8, 9). Genotypes were considered identical when they showed the same alleles for all 9 markers. A cluster was defined as different isolates with an identical genotype. Genotypic diversity was represented graphically using a minimum spanning tree. Simpson's index of diversity (D) was calculated to study the genotypic diversity of A. fumigatus overall and by groups of patients with and without invasive aspergillosis (10).

This study was approved by the local ethics committee (Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica del Hospital Gregorio Marañón [CEIC-A1]). All patient data were anonymized.

Overall, 395 genotypes were detected in the 236 patients (Fig. 1); 50% of the patients yielded ≥2 genotypes (range, 2 to 7) (Fig. 2). The overall genetic diversity and that found in the groups of the patients with and without invasive aspergillosis was 0.995, 0.988, and 0.992, respectively. Most of the genotypes (n = 345; 87%) were found in 1 patient each, and 153 were from patients with invasive aspergillosis, whereas 192 were from colonized patients. The remaining genotypes (n = 50; 13%) were clusters affecting 95 of the 236 (40%) patients (Fig. 1); the clusters involved 2 patients (37/50 clusters), 3 patients (9/50 clusters), or 4 patients (4/50 clusters). Patients in the clusters were admitted to the hospital on different dates. Some clusters involved only patients with invasive aspergillosis (12/50 genotypes) or colonized patients (14/50 genotypes), whereas the others (24/50 genotypes) involved both groups. The percentages of patients with invasive aspergillosis or colonization in the clusters were 45% and 37%, respectively.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Minimum spanning tree (MST) showing the interstrain genetic relatedness of the 395 A. fumigatus sensu stricto genotypes found. Only one representative isolate per genotype and per patient was chosen to construct the MST. Circles represent different genotypes. The size of each circle represents the number of isolates belonging to the same genotype. Colors indicate the sources of the isolates. Connecting lines between the circles show the similarity between profiles; solid and bold lines indicate differences in only 1 marker, a solid line indicates differences in 2 markers, long dashes indicate differences in 3 markers, and short dashes indicate differences in 4 or more markers.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Number of patients in whom one or more genotypes were found.

In order to know whether the isolates from patients with a definitive diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis were found exclusively in infected patients, 30 genotypes found in the 16 patients with proven aspergillosis were studied. However, 4 of the 30 genotypes were also found in samples from the colonized patients. The percentages of genotypes found in patients with invasive aspergillosis, in colonized patients, and in both groups were 42%, 52%, and 6%, respectively. The percentages of clusters did not change considerably during the study period, regardless of the number of genotypes found in each year (Fig. 3).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Distribution of the number of patients and genotypes per year. The percentage of clusters per year is also shown.

Our study shows that STRAf genotyping did not differentiate between A. fumigatus isolates from patients with invasive aspergillosis and isolates from colonized patients. The significance of the isolation of A. fumigatus in clinical samples is challenging and should be interpreted according to the clinical context of the patient (1). Such an approach is particularly problematic in patients without hematological conditions, in whom colonization by Aspergillus is frequent and the role of biomarker detection and radiology is limited (3, 7). The possibility of having laboratory tools for screening for invasive aspergillosis based exclusively on the characterization of the A. fumigatus isolates is attractive.

A. fumigatus typing has been performed to unravel the source of nosocomial outbreaks of invasive aspergillosis (11), to study the clonal patterns of infection or colonization in specific groups of patients (e.g., patients with cystic fibrosis or aspergilloma) (12), and to study the virulence of A. fumigatus isolates in a Drosophila fly model (6). The presence of variable degrees of virulence between isolates in the fly model suggested the role of virulence in the development of invasive aspergillosis. Unfortunately, we have not been able to find a study in which virulence was associated with the development of invasive aspergillosis in humans. We hypothesized that STRAf may play a role in detecting isolates found exclusively in patients with invasive aspergillosis or in colonized patients. Although we observed high genetic diversity—most STRAf genotypes were found exclusively in patients with invasive aspergillosis or colonized patients—up to 6% of the genotypes were found in both groups. Furthermore, 50% of the clusters involved both groups, and this finding did not change when only the genotypes from patients with proven invasive aspergillosis were included. Our findings suggest that a patient's underlying conditions play a major role in the development of infection. Another explanation is that isolates belonging to a specific clone can show different degrees of virulence, thus confirming the limitation of STRAf for this purpose.

The main limitation of this study is that genes specifically related to virulence that may be better markers than STRAf were not studied. Future studies using procedures with higher resolution, such as whole-genome sequencing, will help us to discern whether there is an association between genotypes and the presence of infection or whether the clusters found by STRAf typing are a consequence of homoplasy or genetic recombination. There is growing evidence of the presence of sexual reproduction in A. fumigatus (13), and this phenomenon may limit the use of STRAf and other classic typing procedures in clinical practice.

We conclude that genotyping cannot discriminate between isolates from patients with invasive aspergillosis and those from colonized patients, as 6% of the genotypes were found in each of the groups.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Thomas O'Boyle for editing the article.

This study was supported by grant CP09/00055 from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS, Instituto de Salud Carlos III). J.G. (grant MS09/00055) and P.E. (grant CD09/00230) are supported by the FIS.

We declare no conflicts of interest.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 11 September 2014.
    • Returned for modification 9 October 2014.
    • Accepted 13 November 2014.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 19 November 2014.
  • Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. De Pauw B,
    2. Walsh TJ,
    3. Donnelly JP,
    4. Stevens DA,
    5. Edwards JE,
    6. Calandra T,
    7. Pappas PG,
    8. Maertens J,
    9. Lortholary O,
    10. Kauffman CA,
    11. Denning DW,
    12. Patterson TF,
    13. Maschmeyer G,
    14. Bille J,
    15. Dismukes WE,
    16. Herbrecht R,
    17. Hope WW,
    18. Kibbler CC,
    19. Kullberg BJ,
    20. Marr KA,
    21. Munoz P,
    22. Odds FC,
    23. Perfect JR,
    24. Restrepo A,
    25. Ruhnke M,
    26. Segal BH,
    27. Sobel JD,
    28. Sorrell TC,
    29. Viscoli C,
    30. Wingard JR,
    31. Zaoutis T,
    32. Bennett JE
    . 2008. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis 46:1813–1821. doi:10.1086/588660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bouza E,
    2. Guinea J,
    3. Pelaez T,
    4. Perez-Molina J,
    5. Alcala L,
    6. Muñoz P
    . 2005. Workload due to Aspergillus fumigatus and significance of the organism in the microbiology laboratory of a general hospital. J Clin Microbiol 43:2075–2079. doi:10.1128/JCM.43.5.2075-2079.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Guinea J,
    2. Torres-Narbona M,
    3. Gijon P,
    4. Muñoz P,
    5. Pozo F,
    6. Pelaez T,
    7. de Miguel J,
    8. Bouza E
    . 2010. Pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:870–877. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03015.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Denning DW
    . 1998. Invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 26:781–805. doi:10.1086/513943.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Speth C,
    2. Kupfahl C,
    3. Pfaller K,
    4. Hagleitner M,
    5. Deutinger M,
    6. Wurzner R,
    7. Mohsenipour I,
    8. Lass-Florl C,
    9. Rambach G
    . 2011. Gliotoxin as putative virulence factor and immunotherapeutic target in a cell culture model of cerebral aspergillosis. Mol Immunol 48:2122–2129. doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2011.07.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ben-Ami R,
    2. Lamaris GA,
    3. Lewis RE,
    4. Kontoyiannis DP
    . 2010. Interstrain variability in the virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus terreus in a Toll-deficient Drosophila fly model of invasive aspergillosis. Med Mycol 48:310–317. doi:10.3109/13693780903148346.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bulpa P,
    2. Dive A,
    3. Sibille Y
    . 2007. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 30:782–800. doi:10.1183/09031936.00062206.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Escribano P,
    2. Pelaez T,
    3. Muñoz P,
    4. Bouza E,
    5. Guinea J
    . 2013. Is azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus a problem in Spain? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:2815–2820. doi:10.1128/AAC.02487-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. de Valk HA,
    2. Meis JF,
    3. Curfs IM,
    4. Muehlethaler K,
    5. Mouton JW,
    6. Klaassen CH
    . 2005. Use of a novel panel of nine short tandem repeats for exact and high-resolution fingerprinting of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. J Clin Microbiol 43:4112–4120. doi:10.1128/JCM.43.8.4112-4120.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Simpson EH
    . 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688. doi:10.1038/163688a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Guinea J,
    2. Garcia de Viedma D,
    3. Pelaez T,
    4. Escribano P,
    5. Muñoz P,
    6. Meis JF,
    7. Klaassen CH,
    8. Bouza E
    . 2011. Molecular epidemiology of Aspergillus fumigatus: an in-depth genotypic analysis of isolates involved in an outbreak of invasive aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol 49:3498–3503. doi:10.1128/JCM.01159-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Vanhee LM,
    2. Nelis HJ,
    3. Coenye T
    . 2010. What can be learned from genotyping of fungi? Med Mycol 48:S60–S69. doi:10.3109/13693786.2010.484816.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Klaassen CH,
    2. Gibbons JG,
    3. Fedorova ND,
    4. Meis JF,
    5. Rokas A
    . 2012. Evidence for genetic differentiation and variable recombination rates among Dutch populations of the opportunistic human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Mol Ecol 21:57–70. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05364.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Microsatellite (STRAf) Genotyping Cannot Differentiate between Invasive and Colonizing Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates
Pilar Escribano, Teresa Peláez, Emilio Bouza, Jesús Guinea
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 2015, 53 (2) 667-670; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02636-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Microsatellite (STRAf) Genotyping Cannot Differentiate between Invasive and Colonizing Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Microsatellite (STRAf) Genotyping Cannot Differentiate between Invasive and Colonizing Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates
Pilar Escribano, Teresa Peláez, Emilio Bouza, Jesús Guinea
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 2015, 53 (2) 667-670; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02636-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X