Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Epidemiology

Presence of Virulent Newcastle Disease Virus in Vaccinated Chickens in Farms in Pakistan

Shafqat Fatima Rehmani, Abdul Wajid, Tasra Bibi, Bushra Nazir, Nadia Mukhtar, Abid Hussain, Nazir Ahmad Lone, Tahir Yaqub, Claudio L. Afonso
Y.-W. Tang, Editor
Shafqat Fatima Rehmani
Quality Operations Laboratory (QOL), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abdul Wajid
Quality Operations Laboratory (QOL), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, PakistanInstitute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology (IBBt), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tasra Bibi
Quality Operations Laboratory (QOL), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bushra Nazir
Quality Operations Laboratory (QOL), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadia Mukhtar
Quality Operations Laboratory (QOL), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abid Hussain
Poultry Disease Diagnostic Lab, Gakkhar, Gujranwala, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nazir Ahmad Lone
Exotic and Emerging Avian Disease Research Unit, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Athens, Georgia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tahir Yaqub
Quality Operations Laboratory (QOL), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, PakistanInstitute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology (IBBt), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudio L. Afonso
Exotic and Emerging Avian Disease Research Unit, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Athens, Georgia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y.-W. Tang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02818-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

One year after a virulent Newcastle disease virus (vNDV) outbreak in Pakistan, the causative strain was present in vaccinated chickens of multiple farms despite the existence of high-average NDV-specific antibody titers (>4.75 log2). The data suggest a possible role of vaccinated birds as reservoirs of vNDV.

TEXT

Newcastle disease (ND) is one of the most devastating diseases affecting the poultry industry worldwide (1). It is caused by avian paramyxoviruses of serotype 1 (APMV-1), also known as Newcastle disease virus (NDV) (1). NDV may be classified into two classes and subdivided into up to 18 genotypes based on genetic diversity (2, 3). Currently, pigeons and cormorants are two well-recognized reservoirs of virulent NDV (vNDV) (4, 5); however, those species normally carry viruses of genotypes Va and VI (1), and the reservoir for other highly virulent viruses that commonly circulate in poultry (genotypes Vb, VII, and XII to XVIII) is unknown.

The failure to control ND with vaccination alone in countries where the virus is endemic underscores the importance of understanding the mechanisms of vNDV maintenance. It has been shown under experimental conditions that vaccines do not prevent the replication of highly virulent viruses; thus, circumstantial evidence suggests that the capacity of vaccinated birds to shed the viruses may allow vaccinated poultry to act as a reservoir (1). As culling is the preferred control strategy in the developed world, and as the epidemiology of vNDV in countries where the virus is endemic is not well understood, evidence supporting a role of vaccinated chickens as a reservoir is missing.

Experimental details.Three hundred tracheal samples from sick or dead birds and 207 blood samples from live vaccinated chickens in production were analyzed for the presence of vNDV during a 3-month period (March to May 2013) after a serious outbreak in Pakistan (2011 to 2012) was contained (6). Serum samples were collected mostly at 3 weeks of age from day-one-vaccinated chickens that were not showing clinical symptoms of NDV. Tracheal tissues and blood samples were collected from chickens across 20 different districts of Punjab for viral isolation in tracheal tissues and for immune status evaluation in blood samples (Table 1 and Fig. 1A). We tested 101 flocks for the presence of vNDV by passaging tracheal samples into 9- to 10-day-old chicken eggs free of maternal antibodies against NDV. Allantoic fluids were tested using a spot hemagglutination (HAI) test, and viruses from the positive samples were isolated and sequenced, as described previously (4). Viral RNA was extracted, and cDNA was synthesized and sequenced, as previously described (6, 7). Universal primers specific for avian influenza were used, as described previously (8). For the sequence analysis of vNDV, primers for amplification of a 374-bp region of the Fusion (F) gene were designed (F-CCCATTAGAGGCATACAACAG and R-CAATATAGGGTAGCCGGTGAT). The evolutionary relationship among these isolates and other GenBank sequences was determined using MEGA6 software (9). To examine the seroprevalence of NDV antibodies, a total of 320 random blood samples from chickens in commercial farms of the different districts were collected, and the geometric mean titers and standard deviations were calculated (8).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Selected strain locations and descriptions, accession numbers corresponding to sequenced regions, farm locations and flock sizes, age and number of samples per bird, observed NDV status and mortality, and HI titer data

  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

(A) Phylogenetic analysis of the partial F gene distances between new and past virulent NDV Pakistani isolates based on the maximum likelihood method. (B) Phylogenetic analysis based on the full fusion gene of selected isolates. (C) Pakistan map showing sites of disease incidence.

Status of poultry flocks.All of the study farms practiced routine vaccination at the hatchery. In 80% of the farms, birds were vaccinated with a live LaSota vaccine at day 1 via spray or eye drop at the hatchery and at days 7 and 14 via water. Twenty percent of the farms used an additional inactivated vaccine dose on day 24. Eighty-eight of the 101 evaluated farms were positive for the presence of NDV, irrespective of bird age (broiler and layers), based on spot HAI and the matrix PCR test; of those 88, 20 farms had a confirmed presence of virulent viruses. The flocks were believed to be free of vNDV; however, because Pakistan is an area of NDV endemicity, the origin of the outbreaks is unknown. Avian mortality ranged from 6% to 50%, and the morbidity rate was recorded to be up to 60% in some farms despite vaccination. In the most severe cases, the disease erupted at 21 to 25 days of age, and the birds succumbed to death within 10 to 15 days (Table 1). No avian influenza was detected. Mortality due to vNDV occurred both in environmentally controlled houses and in open sheds (data not shown). The immune status, assessed by measuring the mean hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers from serum samples (log2) showed high-average values ranging from 4.7 to 6.9, and an HI titer of log2 >3 was detected in 99% of the 320 birds tested (Table 1).

Molecular epidemiology.Twenty NDV isolates representative of the different districts were selected for genotyping (Table 1 and Fig. 1A through C). Partial and complete F gene sequences (374 and 1,662 bp, respectively) of viruses from different districts (n = 20) were obtained and compared with F gene sequences of representative NDV isolates belonging to the genotypes of class II of NDV and to previously characterized Pakistani viruses. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis based on nucleotide sequences demonstrated that all NDV isolates from 2013 were grouped within genotype VII of class II as subgenotype VIIi (Fig. 1A and B). The nucleotide sequence of this highly variable region of the F protein revealed a 99.6% nucleotide identity among 2013 isolates of subgenotype VIIi and a 96.4% identity among 2012 isolates from the same subgenotype. All other available NDV GenBank sequences revealed a lower nucleotide identity with the new isolates, suggesting that all of the viruses from 2013 are related to each other and that they originated from viruses of the 2012 outbreak. We have recently shown that the subgenotype VIIi has replaced the existing viruses of genotype XIII and VIId in Pakistan and was the predominant subgenotype in poultry during 2011 and 2012 (6, 10). The virulence of the new isolates was confirmed by sequence of the predicted cleavage site of the F protein, which indicated that all of the isolates carried the 112RRQKRF117 motif corresponding to the cleavage site of virulent NDV.

Significance.Sequence analysis confirms that, 1 year after a highly virulent outbreak occurred in Pakistan, 20 vNDV-positive farms in the vast geographic region of Punjab were infected with viruses of the same lineage that caused the problem in 2012. This infection occurred during a 3-month period (and continued during 2014) despite the overall relatively high levels of anti-NDV antibodies detected in 99% of the samples. Current knowledge about NDV vaccines based on experimental studies in laboratory settings that mimicked field conditions suggests that herd immunity of >85% with antibody titers of log2 HI >3 should protect against viral spread (11). However, the authors cautioned about the limitations of the study due to the reduced amount of data available and to the possible difficulties in achieving effective distribution of antibodies titers in large populations of poultry. Our results, although limited, present field data that suggest that, despite high levels of anti-NDV antibody titers of >3 log2 HI in 99% of the tested birds in different farms and localities, there was very high incidence of the disease (Table 1). Although it is possible that correctly vaccinated chickens may not sustain vNDV under optimal laboratory conditions, other factors that may affect the immune status of the flock in the field, such as immunosuppression or nonuniform vaccination leading to a rolling infection, may allow the persistence of virulent viruses in vaccinated birds. Thus, there is a need to reevaluate the robustness of current vaccination methods under field conditions and the role of vaccinated birds in viral maintenance.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.All of the F gene sequences obtained in this study were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KF761533 to KF761552 (Table 1).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Funding has been provided by U.S. Department of State (USDA/ARS/BEP/CRDF) grants NDV 31063, USDA CRIS 6612-32000-064, and PARB CGS project 572.

We thank the PARB for technical assistance during the surveillance studies and particularly thank the Director of the Poultry Research Institute, Rawalpindi, for assigning a team to facilitate the collection of samples.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 30 September 2014.
    • Returned for modification 20 November 2014.
    • Accepted 8 February 2015.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 18 February 2015.
  • Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Miller PJ,
    2. Decanini EL,
    3. Afonso CL
    . 2010. Newcastle disease: evolution of genotypes and the related diagnostic challenges. Infect Genet Evol 10:26–35. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2009.09.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Diel DG,
    2. da Silva LH,
    3. Liu H,
    4. Wang Z,
    5. Miller PJ,
    6. Afonso CL
    . 2012. Genetic diversity of avian paramyxovirus type 1: proposal for a unified nomenclature and classification system of Newcastle disease virus genotypes. Infect Genet Evol 12:1770–1779. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2012.07.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Snoeck CJ,
    2. Owoade AA,
    3. Couacy-Hymann E,
    4. Alkali BR,
    5. Okwen MP,
    6. Adeyanju AT,
    7. Komoyo GF,
    8. Nakouné E,
    9. Faou AL,
    10. Mullera CP
    . 2013. High genetic diversity of Newcastle disease virus in poultry in West and Central Africa: cocirculation of genotype XIV and newly defined genotypes XVII and XVIII. J Clin Microbiol 51:2250–2260. doi:10.1128/JCM.00684-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Diel DG,
    2. Miller PJ,
    3. Wolf PC,
    4. Mickley RM,
    5. Musante AR,
    6. Emanueli DC,
    7. Shively KJ,
    8. Pedersen K,
    9. Afonso CL
    . 2012. Characterization of Newcastle disease viruses isolated from cormorant and gull species in the United States in 2010. Avian Dis 56:128–133. doi:10.1637/9886-081111-Reg.1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kim LM,
    2. King DJ,
    3. Guzman H,
    4. Tesh RB,
    5. Travassos da Rosa AP,
    6. Bueno R, Jr,
    7. Dennett JA,
    8. Afonso CL
    . 2008. Biological and phylogenetic characterization of pigeon paramyxovirus serotype 1 circulating in wild North American pigeons and doves. J Clin Microbiol 46:3303–3310. doi:10.1128/JCM.00644-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Miller PJ,
    2. Haddas R,
    3. Simanov,
    4. Lublin A,
    5. Rehmani SF,
    6. Wajid A,
    7. Bibi T,
    8. Khan TA,
    9. Yaqub T,
    10. Setiyaningsih S,
    11. Afonso CL
    . 2015. Identification of new subgenotypes of virulent Newcastle disease virus with potential panzootic features. Infect Genet Evol 29:216–229. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2014.10.032.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kim LM,
    2. King DJ,
    3. Curry PE,
    4. Suarez DL,
    5. Swayne DE,
    6. Stallknecht DE,
    7. Slemons RD,
    8. Pedersen JC,
    9. Senne DA,
    10. Winker K,
    11. Afonso CL
    . 2007. Phylogenetic diversity among low-virulence Newcastle disease viruses from waterfowl and shorebirds and comparison of genotype distributions to those of poultry-origin isolates. J Virol 81:12641–12520. doi:10.1128/JVI.00843-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    OIE. 2013. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals: mammals, birds and bees, biological standards commission, p 1–19. World Organisation of Animals Health, Paris, France.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Tamura K,
    2. Stecher G,
    3. Peterson D,
    4. Filipski A,
    5. Kumar S
    . 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729. doi:10.1093/molbev/mst197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Khan TA,
    2. Rehmani SF,
    3. Ahmed A,
    4. Lone NA,
    5. Khan MN
    . 2012. Characterization of Newcastle disease virus isolated during 1995 to 2009 from suburbs of Karachi-Pakistan. Pakistan J Zool 44:443–448.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. van Boven M,
    2. Bouma A,
    3. Fabri TH,
    4. Katsma E,
    5. Hartog L,
    6. Koch G
    . 2008. Herd immunity to Newcastle disease virus in poultry by vaccination. Avian Pathol 37:1–5. doi:10.1080/03079450701772391.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Presence of Virulent Newcastle Disease Virus in Vaccinated Chickens in Farms in Pakistan
Shafqat Fatima Rehmani, Abdul Wajid, Tasra Bibi, Bushra Nazir, Nadia Mukhtar, Abid Hussain, Nazir Ahmad Lone, Tahir Yaqub, Claudio L. Afonso
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 2015, 53 (5) 1715-1718; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02818-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Presence of Virulent Newcastle Disease Virus in Vaccinated Chickens in Farms in Pakistan
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
Share
Presence of Virulent Newcastle Disease Virus in Vaccinated Chickens in Farms in Pakistan
Shafqat Fatima Rehmani, Abdul Wajid, Tasra Bibi, Bushra Nazir, Nadia Mukhtar, Abid Hussain, Nazir Ahmad Lone, Tahir Yaqub, Claudio L. Afonso
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 2015, 53 (5) 1715-1718; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02818-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X