DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00487-16
Article Information
PubMed
Published By
History
- Published online September 23, 2016.
Copyright & Usage
Copyright © 2016 Pomares and Montoya. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Editors and / or Reviewers
- C. S. Kraft, Editor, Emory University
Article Versions
- Accepted Manuscript version (May 04, 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Author Information
- aPalo Alto Medical Foundation Toxoplasma Serology Laboratory, National Reference Center for the Study and Diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis, Palo Alto, California, USA
- bStanford University, Division of Infectious Diseases, Stanford, California, USA
- cINSERM U1065, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, Toxines Microbiennes dans la Relation Hôte-Pathogènes, Nice, France
- dService de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
- Address correspondence to Jose G. Montoya, gilberto{at}stanford.edu.
Citation Pomares C, Montoya JG. 2016. Laboratory diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol 54:2448–2454. doi:10.1128/JCM.00487-16.
Article usage
- Top
- Article
- ABSTRACT
- INTRODUCTION
- GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
- PRINCIPLES AND METHODS AVAILABLE FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CONGENITAL TOXOPLASMOSIS
- OVERALL DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH
- DIFFERENCES IN THE DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH TO CT ACCORDING TO THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF MATERNAL SCREENING AND TREATMENT PROGRAMS
- SIMILARITIES IN THE DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH TO CT ACCORDING TO THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF MATERNAL SCREENING AND TREATMENT PROGRAMS
- FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- REFERENCES
- Author Bios
- Figures & Data
- Info & Metrics