Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Parasitology

Inactivating Zaire Ebolavirus in Whole-Blood Thin Smears Used for Malaria Diagnosis

Todd Cutts, Bradley Cook, Guillaume Poliquin, James Strong, Steven Theriault
P. H. Gilligan, Editor
Todd Cutts
aApplied Biosafety Research Program, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
bJ. C. Wilt Infectious Diseases Research Centre, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Todd Cutts
Bradley Cook
bJ. C. Wilt Infectious Diseases Research Centre, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
aApplied Biosafety Research Program, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guillaume Poliquin
dOffice of the Scientific Director General, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
eDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Strong
eDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
fDiagnostics Unit, Special Pathogens Program, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Theriault
aApplied Biosafety Research Program, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
bJ. C. Wilt Infectious Diseases Research Centre, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
cDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. H. Gilligan
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02960-15
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Malaria is an important mimic or coinfection in potential Ebolavirus disease patients. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of the 100% methanol-inactivating Zaire Ebolavirus Makona variant for malaria thin-smear preparation. We determined that 100% methanol completely inactivated the virus after 15 min.

TEXT

The 2014-2015 West African Ebola outbreak has uncovered knowledge gaps in several areas regarding the safe handling of high-containment viruses in clinical environments, such as front-line diagnostic laboratories. A specific area of concern is the safe preparation of blood smears for malaria diagnosis. Symptoms of malaria, such as fever, headache, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, closely mimic those of early Ebolavirus disease (EVD) (1–3). Additionally, since the two viruses circulate in the same geographic area, coinfection is a concern (2). Malaria can be rapidly fatal if left untreated, and as such, empirical antimalarial treatments are recommended in hospitals and Ebola management centers in affected areas of Africa (3). In other areas of the world, antimalarial agents for severe malaria (e.g., artemisinin-based compounds) can be difficult to access due to limited supply or geographic distance (4). It is therefore important for laboratories to be able to provide malaria smears that are safe and concomitant with Ebola diagnostic results.

The Giemsa and Wright (Diff-Quik) staining techniques for malaria parasites in blood samples are robust diagnostic methods easily performed in most laboratory settings. Prior to staining, blood samples are prepared in either a thin- and/or thick-smear manner. Thick smears can better detect the presence of Plasmodium spp. than thin smears but are not methanol fixed, while the thin smears can be fixed in methanol and provide the benefit of detection and identification of the malarial species (5–8). However, it has not been definitively demonstrated that a methanol fixation step prior to a Giemsa or Wright staining procedure is sufficient to inactivate Zaire Ebolavirus (EBOV) in suspect malaria samples. Since the two agents circulate within the same areas, have similar symptoms, and can coinfect, diagnostic samples require safe handling to prevent potential EBOV infection in health care workers. In this study, we evaluated the effects of methanol and a methanol heat treatment against the EBOV/Mak variant using thin-smeared slides containing human whole blood spiked with EBOV/Mak in the absence of the Plasmodium parasites.

Virus stock concentrates were prepared, as previously described (9). Whole blood from a volunteer was drawn and the sample stored at 4°C. An aliquot of whole blood was spiked with concentrated EBOV/Mak virus preparation (9) to attain a final concentration of 108 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID50)/ml per milliliter of blood. Five microliters of the spiked blood was placed on a clean plastic microscope slide (catalog no. S67112A; Fisher), and smeared according to the procedure described by the CDC (5, 6). Glass was replaced by plastic slides, as per our institution's biosafety protocols within the containment level 4 laboratory.

Briefly, blood was smeared using a clean plastic slide over top of the droplet; once capillary action pulled the blood laterally, a continuous motion was used to thinly spread the blood droplet across the slide. The slides were air dried for 15 min in a biosafety cabinet at room temperature. Polypropylene Coplin jars (catalog no. S90130; Fisher) were filled with 100% methanol, and the slides were submerged in methanol for 15, 30, or 60 min, removed, and air dried for 10 min. A combination of chemical and heat inactivation was investigated by placing a second set of methanol-fixed slides at 56°C for 1 h utilizing a Boekel Scientific Slide Moat incubator (catalog no. I05-450-31; Fisher). Following each treatment, virus elution was performed by placing the treated slides within a 6-well tissue culture dish, rinsing with 1 ml of Dulbecco's modified essential medium (DMEM) plus 2% fetal calf serum (FCS) plus 10 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (pen-strep), scraping for 1 min using a pipette tip, and titrating in Vero E6 cells (ATCC CRL 1586) using the Reed-Muench TCID50 procedure (10). Two treatments of three biological replicates were assessed, each including three technical replicates.

Infectivity loss from the drying procedure was tested by comparing the fresh nonsmeared (5 μl) spiked blood to the dried-smear sample. This revealed a small difference, with the undried sample yielding 5.9 (± 0.12 standard deviation [SD]) log TCID50/ml compared to 4.7 (± 0.19 SD) log TCID50/ml for the dried sample. This loss of 1.2 logs was likely a result of the effects of drying on the virus and was considered statistically significant (P = 0.00037, Student's paired t test). Methanol fixation proved effective at completely inactivating the EBOV/Mak virus at all examined time points (15, 30, and 60 min), with no additional benefit from heat treatment at 56°C for 1 h following the fixation step (Fig. 1). Thus, methanol treatment alone is sufficient for EBOV inactivation and improvement of biosafety. Although not reported in this study, multiple reports have indicated that neither methanol fixation nor heat inactivation will negatively affect the quality of whole-blood thin smears or the diagnosis of malaria during the staining procedures for malaria (8, 11–14).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Effect of methanol (MeOH) fixation against whole blood spiked with 108 TCID50/ml EBOV/Mak. Whole blood was spiked with 108 TCID50/ml virions with 5 μl of spiked sample dried on microscope slide. Slides were submerged in 100% methanol for 15, 30, and 60 min and evaluated with an additional second set of methanol-treated slides evaluated with an additional hour of 56°C heat treatment. Infectious viral particle amounts are presented with the standard deviations.

The CDC guidelines state that handling of suspected EBOV cases in whole blood while screening for malaria should be treated by adding small amounts of Triton X-100 (5, 6, 15). Although it is believed that the additional Triton X-100 would inactivate EBOV particles within malaria samples and that the impact on clinical biochemical and histology assays is minimal (14, 16, 17), no data have been found in peer-reviewed material to support the use of Triton X-100 in inactivating EBOV.

In conclusion, a 15-min methanol fixation step was able to inactivate a high Ebola viral load within a whole-blood thin-smear sample. Given the efficiency of methanol alone, it is unlikely that heat treatment would provide an additional benefit. While there was a statistically significant decrease in the viral titer from air-drying alone (1.2 logs), the resulting EBOV/Mak viral load (4.7 logs) is still considered to pose a high risk to individuals handling such slides prior to methanol fixation. It is our belief that that the handling of the thick smears for suspected Ebola infection poses a higher risk, as they contain larger volumes of infected blood, are not methanol fixed, and should not be used. While both the thin and thick smears allow for the detection of the Plasmodium parasites, the thin smears can further identify species and can accommodate the additional methanol fixation step, rendering any EBOV inert.

Studies regarding methanol fixation and its application to other important high-containment pathogens are under way. Diagnostic laboratories must therefore carefully design safe handling protocols for the preparation and handling of the malaria smear prior to the fixation step.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 5 November 2015.
    • Returned for modification 29 November 2015.
    • Accepted 27 January 2016.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 10 February 2016.
  • Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Biddinger PD,
    2. Hooper DC,
    3. Shenoy ES,
    4. Bajwa EK,
    5. Robbins GK,
    6. Branda JA
    . 2015. Case 28-2015—a 32-year-old man with fever, headache, and myalgias after traveling from Liberia. N Engl J Med 373:1060–1067. doi:10.1056/NEJMcpc1503828.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    CDC. 2015. Recommendations for managing and preventing cases of malaria in areas with Ebola. Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA. http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/malaria-cases.html.
  3. 3.↵
    WHO. 2014. Guidance on temporary malaria control measures in Ebola-affected countries. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/141493/1/WHO_HTM_GMP_2014.10_eng.pdf?ua=1.
  4. 4.↵
    Public Health Agency of Canada. 2014. Canadian recommendations for the prevention and treatment of malaria: an Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT). Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2014/aspc-phac/HP40-102-2014-eng.pdf.
  5. 5.↵
    CDC. Laboratory diagnosis of malaria: preparation of blood smears. Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA. http://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/resources/pdf/benchAids/malaria/Malaria_procedures_benchaid.pdf.
  6. 6.↵
    CDC. Laboratory diagnosis of malaria: staining for malaria parasites. Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA. http://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/resources/pdf/benchAids/malaria/malaria_staining_benchaid.pdf.
  7. 7.↵
    CDC. 2007. Microscopic procedures for diagnosing malaria. MMWR Surveill Summ 56(SS-06):39–40.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Fernando SD,
    2. Ihalamulla RL,
    3. Wickremasinghe R,
    4. de Silva NL,
    5. Thilakarathne JH,
    6. Wijeyaratne P,
    7. Premaratne RG
    . 2014. Effects of modifying the World Health Organization standard operating procedures for malaria microscopy to improve surveillance in resource poor settings. Malar J 13:98. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-13-98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Cook BW,
    2. Cutts TA,
    3. Nikiforuk AM,
    4. Poliquin PG,
    5. Court DA,
    6. Strong JE,
    7. Theriault SS
    . 2015. Evaluating environmental persistence and disinfection of the Ebola virus Makona variant. Viruses 7:1975–1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Reed LJ,
    2. Muench H
    . 1937. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am J Hyg 27:493.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Lozier JN,
    2. Calvo KR
    . 2015. Effect of viral decontamination measures on Wright-stained blood smears. Blood 125:1350–1351.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    CDC. 2015. Malaria diagnostics (U.S.)–microscopy. Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA. http://www.cdc.gov/malaria/diagnosis_treatment/microscopy.html.
  13. 13.↵
    1. wright JH
    . 1980. A rapid method for the differential staining of blood films and malarial parasites. J Med Res 7:138–144.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Lau R,
    2. Wang A,
    3. Chong-Kit A,
    4. Ralevski F,
    5. Boggild AK
    . 2015. Evaluation of Ebola virus inactivation procedures for Plasmodium falciparum malaria diagnostics. J Clin Microbiol 53:1387–1390. doi:10.1128/JCM.00165-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    CDC. 2015. Guidance for the malaria diagnosis in patients suspected of Ebola infection in the United States. Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA. http://www.cdc.gov/malaria/new_info/2014/malaria_ebola.htm.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Tempestilli M,
    2. Pucci L,
    3. Notari S,
    4. Di Caro A,
    5. Castilletti C,
    6. Rivelli MR,
    7. Agrati C,
    8. Pucillo LP
    . 2015. Diagnostic performances of clinical laboratory tests using Triton X-100 to reduce the biohazard associated with routine testing of Ebola virus-infected patients. Clin Chem Lab Med 53:1967–1973.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Loutfy MR,
    2. Assmar M,
    3. Hay Burgess DC,
    4. Kain KC
    . 1998. Effects of viral hemorrhagic fever inactivation methods on the performance of rapid diagnostic tests for Plasmodium falciparum. J Infect Dis 178:1852–1855. doi:10.1086/314524.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.
    1. Mifsud A,
    2. Peelen D,
    3. Brincat P,
    4. Abela S,
    5. Debattista N,
    6. Laspina S,
    7. Zammit D,
    8. Camilleri DJ,
    9. Gatt A
    . A feasibility study on the effects of Triton X-100 for the in vitro inactivation of Ebola virus on haematological assays. Clin Chem Lab Med, in press.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Inactivating Zaire Ebolavirus in Whole-Blood Thin Smears Used for Malaria Diagnosis
Todd Cutts, Bradley Cook, Guillaume Poliquin, James Strong, Steven Theriault
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2016, 54 (4) 1157-1159; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02960-15

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inactivating Zaire Ebolavirus in Whole-Blood Thin Smears Used for Malaria Diagnosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Inactivating Zaire Ebolavirus in Whole-Blood Thin Smears Used for Malaria Diagnosis
Todd Cutts, Bradley Cook, Guillaume Poliquin, James Strong, Steven Theriault
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2016, 54 (4) 1157-1159; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02960-15
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X