Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Immunoassays

Evaluation of a Quantitative Serological Assay for Diagnosing Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis

Satoru Fujiuchi, Yuka Fujita, Hokuto Suzuki, Kazushi Doushita, Hikaru Kuroda, Masaaki Takahashi, Yasuhiro Yamazaki, Tadakatsu Tsuji, Toshiaki Fujikane, Shinobu Osanai, Takaaki Sasaki, Yoshinobu Ohsaki
Y.-W. Tang, Editor
Satoru Fujiuchi
aDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Asahikawa Medical Center, Asahikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuka Fujita
aDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Asahikawa Medical Center, Asahikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hokuto Suzuki
aDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Asahikawa Medical Center, Asahikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazushi Doushita
aDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Asahikawa Medical Center, Asahikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hikaru Kuroda
aDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Asahikawa Medical Center, Asahikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masaaki Takahashi
aDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Asahikawa Medical Center, Asahikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasuhiro Yamazaki
aDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Asahikawa Medical Center, Asahikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tadakatsu Tsuji
aDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Asahikawa Medical Center, Asahikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toshiaki Fujikane
aDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Asahikawa Medical Center, Asahikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shinobu Osanai
bCardiovascular Respiratory Frontier of Medical Renovation, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takaaki Sasaki
cRespiratory Center, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshinobu Ohsaki
cRespiratory Center, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y.-W. Tang
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01475-15
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of a quantitative Aspergillus IgG assay for diagnosing chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. We examined Aspergillus-specific IgG levels in patients who met the following criteria: (i) chronic (duration of >3 months) pulmonary or systemic symptoms, (ii) radiological evidence of a progressive (over months or years) pulmonary lesion with surrounding inflammation, and (iii) no major discernible immunocompromising factors. Anti-Aspergillus IgG serum levels were retrospectively analyzed according to defined classifications. Mean Aspergillus IgG levels were significantly higher in the proven group than those in the possible and control groups (P < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the Aspergillus IgG cutoff value for diagnosing proven cases was 50 mg of antigen-specific antibodies/liter (area under the curve, 0.94; sensitivity, 0.98; specificity, 0.84). The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing proven cases using this cutoff were 0.77 and 0.78, respectively. The positive rates of Aspergillus IgG in the proven and possible groups were 97.9% and 39.2%, respectively, whereas that of the control group was 6.6%. The quantitative Aspergillus IgG assay offers reliable sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing chronic pulmonary aspergillosis and may be an alternative to the conventional precipitin test.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) usually occurs in patients with underlying pulmonary disease (1), and the lesion usually progresses latently. Therefore, it is not uncommon for patients to suddenly develop hemoptysis and/or respiratory failure. CPA is considered to be one of the most refractory pulmonary infectious diseases; the estimated 5-year survival rate of CPA is 50%, which is similar to that of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (2). Because Aspergillus is the causative agent, isolation of the responsible Aspergillus species from the airway tract is important for diagnosis, but the rate of isolation on sputum culture examination is relatively low (3). At present, serum detection of IgG antibodies to Aspergillus is considered to be the most reliable method for diagnosing CPA (4). Immunodiffusion analysis is widely used to detect the anti-Aspergillus antibody precipitin; however, it takes up to 1 week to obtain results. Recent studies have described the use of fluorescent immunoenzyme assays for quantifying IgGs to Aspergillus and have reported that it seemed to be more sensitive than conventional anti-Aspergillus antibody detection (5, 6). In this study, we examined the utility of quantitative measurement of IgG to Aspergillus for diagnosing CPA.

(This study was presented in part at the European Respiratory Society International Congress, Munich, Germany, 2014.).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was performed at the National Hospital Organization Asahikawa Medical Center. From January 2007 to August 2013, 269 patients with underlying chronic respiratory disease who were considered to have CPA based on three criteria (Table 1) were examined. These criteria were (i) chronic (duration of >3 months) pulmonary or systemic symptoms (e.g., cough, bloody sputum, hemoptysis, pyrexia, or dyspnea), (ii) radiological evidence of a progressive (over months or years) pulmonary lesion with surrounding inflammation (e.g., cavitation, infiltration, and pleural thickening), and (iii) no major discernible immunocompromising factors (e.g., AIDS, leukemia, or transplantation). There were no patients treated with corticosteroids (more than a dose of 0.3 mg/kg of body weight per day), cyclosporine, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) blockers, or specific monoclonal antibodies. Patients with a history of antifungal treatment that could affect antibody values were excluded. Cases of stable nontuberculous mycobacteriosis with negative sputum culture were also enrolled. Circulating anti-Aspergillus antibodies were examined using the immunodiffusion method. The residual serum was stored at −80°C for further analysis to measure the concentration of a specific IgG to Aspergillus. The patients were divided into three groups according to antibody status and inflammation markers. Patients with circulating precipitating (IgG) antibody to Aspergillus and persistently elevated inflammation markers (C-reactive protein of >0.3 mg/dl or white blood cell counts of >9,000/μl for >3 months) were defined as proven CPA. Patients without circulating precipitating (IgG) antibody to Aspergillus and persistently elevated inflammation markers were considered to have possible CPA. Patients with temporarily elevated inflammation markers with any circulating precipitating (IgG) antibody were defined as controls. The classification of proven CPA is based on the diagnostic criteria proposed by Denning et al. (7). We examined anti-Aspergillus precipitin levels with an Aspergillus immunodiffusion FSK-1 kit (Microgen Bioproducts Ltd., Camberley, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the immunodiffusion reaction was performed in agarose gel for 3 days. After stringent washing, the agarose gel was stained with crystal violet. Precipitin was considered positive if precipitation arcs were visible to 2 mg/ml for Aspergillus fumigatus somatic antigen and culture filtrate.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient characteristics

Quantification of specific IgG to Aspergillus in collected serum was performed using the ImmunoCAP method (Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden). We employed fluorescent immunoenzyme assays to measure the concentration of a specific IgG to Aspergillus using Gm3 ImmunoCap as an antigen. All statistic tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed with SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

The specific Aspergillus IgG level was significantly higher in the proven CPA group (161.2 mg of antigen-specific antibodies [mgA]/liter) than that in the control group (23.9 mgA/liter; P < 0.01) (Fig. 1). In the possible CPA group, the specific Aspergillus IgG level was 50.6 mgA/liter, which was also higher than that in the control group. ROC curve analysis revealed that the optimal Aspergillus IgG cutoff for diagnosing proven CPA was 50 mgA/liter (area under the curve [AUC], 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.912 to 0.972; sensitivity, 0.98; specificity, 0.84 at a cutoff of 50 mgA/liter) (Fig. 2). Whereas the current cutoff value (40 mgA/liter) indicated that sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 and 0.75, respectively. The cutoff value at 50 mgA/liter showed better sensitivity and specificity than those at 40 mgA/liter. The positive rates of Aspergillus IgG using this cutoff in the proven and possible groups were 97.9% and 39.2%, respectively, whereas the control group was 6.6% (Table 2). The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing proven cases using a cutoff of 50 mgA/liter were 0.77 and 0.78, respectively. The comparison of anti-Aspergillus precipitin (IgG) with specific Aspergillus IgG concentration is shown in Fig. 3. Specific IgG was significantly higher in precipitin-positive patients; however, there were some cases with low Aspergillus IgG levels.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Average Aspergillus IgG level in serum from each group measured by fluorescent immunoenzyme assay. Data represent the means ± standard deviations (SDs). *, P value of <0.01.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

ROC analysis for diagnosing probable and proven cases. The optimal cutoff value of Aspergillus IgG for diagnosing proven and probable cases was 50 mgA/liter (AUC, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.912 to 0.972; sensitivity, 0.98; specificity, 0.84).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Positive rates for the quantitative Aspergillus IgG assay (cutoff, 50 mgA/liter)

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

The comparison of anti-Aspergillus precipitin (IgG) with specific Aspergillus IgG levels. Specific IgG was significantly higher in precipitin-positive patients; however, there were some positive cases with low Aspergillus IgG levels.

DISCUSSION

According to Japanese autopsy records, the frequency of deep mycoses gradually decreased to ∼3% by 1994, but it subsequently increased and reached 4.6% in 2001 (8). Although the prevalence of candidiasis continues to decrease and now accounts for only 40% of deep mycoses compared to that in 1990, the increase in aspergillosis persists and is currently considered a major fungal infection. Tashiro et al. reported increased isolation of Aspergillus spp. from respiratory specimens in Nagasaki, Japan (9). These epidemical alternations may be due to the increasing number of elderly subjects with pulmonary comorbidities in our country. Thus, the issue of Aspergillus infection may be focused not only in Japan but also in other developed nations.

The quality of life of CPA patients is drastically reduced in the advanced stages of disease. Although CPA lesions progress silently, the 5-year survival rate of CPA patients is estimated to be around 50% (2, 10, 11). We previously reported that the number of lesions found in the lobes of the lungs predicts the prognosis (12). Therefore, early diagnosis and timely intervention may improve CPA patient prognosis. The detection of pathogenic fungi is the basis of infectious disease diagnosis, but because Aspergillus species are ubiquitous, their isolation from the respiratory tract is not always evidence of pathology. Only surgical resection and pathology findings can provide a definitive diagnosis. However, such procedures are not usually possible because of the patients' poor general condition.

It is important to carry out serodiagnostic examinations in early-stage CPA. Screening examinations should be performed when any of the following occur: a new infiltrative shadow, hollow expansion, hyperplasia of a cavity wall, progressive pleural thickening, niveau formation on a chest X-ray in patients with old tuberculosis, pulmonary cyst, pulmonary fibrosis, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Measuring galactomannan antigen levels is not useful for CPA diagnosis because of its low sensitivity (13). Denning et al. proposed a set of diagnostic criteria in combination with clinical and anti-Aspergillus antibody conditions (7). To date, detection of the precipitating anti-Aspergillus antibody is considered the most reliable method and is used for CPA diagnosis in Japan.

Three types of anti-Aspergillus antibody detection techniques are accepted worldwide. Baxter et al. reported that the IgG quantification assay using a fluorescent immunoenzyme assay (ImmunoCAP) is superior to conventional precipitin detection (6), and this method recently became available in Japan (5). In the present study, we examined the utility of quantitative measurement of IgG to Aspergillus for diagnosing CPA. To detect anti-Aspergillus precipitin, we used the same antigen that Baxter et al. employed in counterimmunoelectrophoresis (6). In contrast to their study, we analyzed subjects who had not been treated with antifungals. We found that Aspergillus IgG levels were significantly higher in the proven group than those in the control group. The current cutoff value (40 mgA/liter) was decided by United Kingdom laboratories following a consensus meeting between six United Kingdom laboratories and Phadia. To our knowledge, there is no published exploratory study for an optimal cutoff value for untreated CPA, so identifying one was a goal of the present work. ROC analysis showed that the best sensitivity and specificity for proven cases were at a cutoff of 50 mgA/liter, which was relatively higher than the usual cutoff value (40 mgA/liter). It is reported that allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) patients exhibit rapidly lower anti-Aspergillus IgG levels after antifungal treatment. We excluded ABPA patients and antifungal-treated subjects, which may have influenced the higher cutoff value. Still, the sensitivity and specificity for proven cases were 0.77 and 0.78, respectively. Furthermore, >95% of proven cases had levels of >50 mgA/liter. It is thought that this cutoff is optimal for untreated subjects. Our results confirm that measuring specific IgGs to Aspergillus is useful for diagnosing CPA. However, we should mention that it is not clear why a few precipitin-positive cases had Aspergillus IgG levels of <50 mgA/liter (Table 3). Further analyses are required to explain this discrepant finding.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Detection power of the quantitative Aspergillus IgG assay

In the clinical setting, physicians often encounter patients who are suspected to have CPA based on their clinical course. It is important to determine whether specific IgG levels are elevated in these “gray” cases. Interestingly, anti-Aspergillus antibody levels in the possible CPA group were higher than those in the control group. In addition, subsequent precipitin tests were positive in 4 out of 50 possible CPA cases. This suggests that the specific IgG test might have been more sensitive than precipitin detection. Therefore, earlier intervention may improve the prognosis of CPA.

Because of the retrospective single facility study, the limitation of patient selection bias is a concern. However, our findings and the findings of others demonstrate the clinical utility of measuring specific IgG for Aspergillus. Furthermore, IgG quantification might be useful for monitoring antifungal treatment responses. The matter of changing of anti-Aspergillus IgG in relation to clinical course or treatment should be analyzed in the future. In conclusion, the Aspergillus IgG fluorescent immunoenzyme assay is a reliable test for diagnosing CPA and may be a suitable replacement for conventional precipitin tests.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

No financial support was received for this study.

We declare no conflicts of interest.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 2 June 2015.
    • Returned for modification 19 November 2015.
    • Accepted 16 March 2016.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 23 March 2016.
  • Copyright © 2016 Fujiuchi et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Smith NL,
    2. Denning DW
    . 2011. Underlying conditions in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis including simple aspergilloma. Eur Respir J 37:865–872. doi:10.1183/09031936.00054810.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Nam HS,
    2. Jeon K,
    3. Um SW,
    4. Suh GY,
    5. Chung MP,
    6. Kim H,
    7. Kwon OJ,
    8. Koh WJ
    . 2010. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis: a review of 43 cases. Int J Infect Dis 14:e479–e482. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2009.07.011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Uffredi ML,
    2. Mangiapan G,
    3. Cadranel J,
    4. Kac G
    . 2003. Significance of Aspergillus fumigatus isolation from respiratory specimens of nongranulocytopenic patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 22:457–462. doi:10.1007/s10096-003-0970-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Denning DW
    . 2001. Chronic forms of pulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 7(Suppl):S25–S31.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Van Hoeyveld E,
    2. Dupont L,
    3. Bossuyt X
    . 2006. Quantification of IgG antibodies to Aspergillus fumigatus and pigeon antigens by ImmunoCAP technology: an alternative to the precipitation technique? Clin Chem 52:1785–1793. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2006.067546.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Baxter CG,
    2. Denning DW,
    3. Jones AM,
    4. Todd A,
    5. Moore CB,
    6. Richardson MD
    . 2013. Performance of two Aspergillus IgG EIA assays compared with the precipitin test in chronic and allergic aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E197–E204. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Denning DW,
    2. Riniotis K,
    3. Dobrashian R,
    4. Sambatakou H
    . 2003. Chronic cavitary and fibrosing pulmonary and pleural aspergillosis: case series, proposed nomenclature change, and review. Clin Infect Dis 37(Suppl):S265–S280. doi:10.1086/376526.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kume H,
    2. Yamazaki T,
    3. Togano T,
    4. Abe M,
    5. Tanuma H,
    6. Kawana S,
    7. Okudaira M
    . 2011. Epidemiology of visceral mycoses in autopsy cases in Japan: comparison of the data from 1989, 1993, 1997, 2001, 2005 and 2007 in Annual of Pathological Autopsy Cases in Japan. Med Mycol J 52:117–127. doi:10.3314/jjmm.52.117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Tashiro T,
    2. Izumikawa K,
    3. Tashiro M,
    4. Takazono T,
    5. Morinaga Y,
    6. Yamamoto K,
    7. Imamura Y,
    8. Miyazaki T,
    9. Seki M,
    10. Kakeya H,
    11. Yamamoto Y,
    12. Yanagihara K,
    13. Yasuoka A,
    14. Kohno S
    . 2011. Diagnostic significance of Aspergillus species isolated from respiratory samples in an adult pneumology ward. Med Mycol 49:581–587.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Nakamoto K,
    2. Takayanagi N,
    3. Kanauchi T,
    4. Ishiguro T,
    5. Yanagisawa T,
    6. Sugita Y
    . 2013. Prognostic factors in 194 patients with chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis. Intern Med 52:727–734. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.52.9142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ohba H,
    2. Miwa S,
    3. Shirai M,
    4. Kanai M,
    5. Eifuku T,
    6. Suda T,
    7. Hayakawa H,
    8. Chida K
    . 2012. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Respir Med 106:724–729. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2012.01.014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Fujiuchi S,
    2. Yamazaki Y,
    3. Matsumoto H,
    4. Yamamoto Y,
    5. Takeda A,
    6. Nishigaki Y,
    7. Fujita Y,
    8. Fujikane T,
    9. Shimizu T
    . 2004. Clinical analyses of Aspergillus infections in patients with underlying pulmonary disease. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 42:865–870. (In Japanese.)
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kitasato Y,
    2. Tao Y,
    3. Hoshino T,
    4. Tachibana K,
    5. Inoshima N,
    6. Yoshida M,
    7. Takata S,
    8. Okabayashi K,
    9. Kawasaki M,
    10. Iwanaga T,
    11. Aizawa H
    . 2009. Comparison of Aspergillus galactomannan antigen testing with a new cut-off index and Aspergillus precipitating antibody testing for the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Respirology 14:701–708. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01548.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Evaluation of a Quantitative Serological Assay for Diagnosing Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis
Satoru Fujiuchi, Yuka Fujita, Hokuto Suzuki, Kazushi Doushita, Hikaru Kuroda, Masaaki Takahashi, Yasuhiro Yamazaki, Tadakatsu Tsuji, Toshiaki Fujikane, Shinobu Osanai, Takaaki Sasaki, Yoshinobu Ohsaki
Journal of Clinical Microbiology May 2016, 54 (6) 1496-1499; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01475-15

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of a Quantitative Serological Assay for Diagnosing Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluation of a Quantitative Serological Assay for Diagnosing Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis
Satoru Fujiuchi, Yuka Fujita, Hokuto Suzuki, Kazushi Doushita, Hikaru Kuroda, Masaaki Takahashi, Yasuhiro Yamazaki, Tadakatsu Tsuji, Toshiaki Fujikane, Shinobu Osanai, Takaaki Sasaki, Yoshinobu Ohsaki
Journal of Clinical Microbiology May 2016, 54 (6) 1496-1499; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01475-15
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X