Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Chlamydiology and Rickettsiology

Combined Testing for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Trichomonas by Use of the BD Max CT/GC/TV Assay with Genitourinary Specimen Types

Barbara Van Der Pol, James A. Williams, DeAnna Fuller, Stephanie N. Taylor, Edward W. Hook III
Erik Munson, Editor
Barbara Van Der Pol
aUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Barbara Van Der Pol
James A. Williams
bIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DeAnna Fuller
cEskenazi Health Services, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie N. Taylor
dLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward W. Hook III
aUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik Munson
Wheaton Franciscan Laboratory
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01766-16
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Sample collection scheme and definition of patient or composite infection status. (A) Samples from women where self-obtained vaginal swab (SOV), clinician-obtained vaginal swab (COV); and endocervical swab (EC). (B) Samples from men.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1

    Participants and prevalence by study site

    Patient sex/clinicClinic typeChlamydia (no. positive/no. enrolled [%])Gonorrhea (no. positive/no. enrolled [%])Trichomonas (no. positive/no. enrolled [%])
    Women
        Eskenazi Health ServicesOB/GYN12/172 (7.0)3/172 (1.7)12/100 (12.0)
        Indiana UniversitySTI13/88 (14.8)4/88 (4.5)15/75 (20.0)
        Louisiana State University Health Sciences CenterSTI15/165 (9.1)3/165 (1.8)22/116 (19.0)
        Planned Parenthood, Gulf CoastFamily planning22/415 (5.3)4/415 (1.0)11/74 (14.9)
        Planned Parenthood, Southern NEFamily planning4/160 (2.5)2/160 (1.3)3/68 (4.4)
        Planned Parenthood, Southeastern PennsylvaniaFamily planning11/283 (3.9)2/283 (0.7)25/240 (10.4)
        State University of New York, DownstateOther4/101 (4)0/101 (0)14/68 (20.6)
        University of Alabama at BirminghamSTI61/606 (10.1)27/606 (4.5%)52/402 (12.9%)
        All participants 142/1990 (7.1%)45/1990 (2.3%)154/1143 (13.5%)
    Men
        Indiana UniversitySTI35/106 (33.0)31/107 (29.0)Trichomonas testing not done using male urine
        Louisiana State University Health Sciences CenterSTI56/278 (20.1)35/284 (12.3)
        Planned Parenthood, Southern NEFamily planning7/42 (16.7)2/42 (4.8)
        State University of New York, DownstateOther13/88 (14.8)6/90 (6.7)
        University of Alabama at BirminghamSTI70/316 (22.2%)34/317 (10.7%)
        All participants 181/830 (21.8%)108/840 (12.9%)
  • TABLE 2

    BD MAX sensitivity and specificity by sample type compared to infection status for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomonas

    Specimen typeChlamydiaGonorrheaTrichomonas
    SensitivityaSpecificityaSensitivityaSpecificityaSensitivityaSpecificitya
    Vaginal swab
        Asymptomatic100 [51/51] (93.0–100)98.7 [734/744] (97.5–99.3)94.1 [16/17] (73.0–99.0)99.9 [777/778] (99.3–100)93.1 [27/29] (78.0–98.1)97.5 [270/277] (94.9–98.9)
        Symptomatic98.9 [89/90] (94.0–99.8)98.6 [938/951] (97.7–99.2)96.3 [26/27] (81.7–99.3)99.8 [1,012/1,014] (99.3–99.9)96.7 [119/123] (91.9–98.2)99.5 [616/619] (98.6–99.8)
        Total99.3 [140/141] (96.1–99.9)98.6 [1,672/1,695](98.0–99.1)95.5 [42/44] (84.9–98.7)99.8 [1,789/1,792] (99.5–99.9)96.1 [146/152] (91.7–98.2)98.9 [886/896] (98.0–99.4)
    Endocervical swab
        Asymptomatic94.1 [48/51] (84.1–98.0)99.1 [737/744] (98.1–99.5)94.1 [16/17] (73.0–99.0)100 [777/777] (99.5–100)96.6 [28/29] (82.8–99.4)98.2 [270/275] (95.8–99.2)
        Symptomatic96.6 [84/87] (90.3–98.8)99.4 [943/949] (98.6–99.7)96.3 [26/27] (81.7–99.3)99.9 [1,002/1,003] (99.4–100)92.7 [114/123] (86.7–96.1)99.8 [611/612] (99.1–100)
        Total95.7 [132/138] (90.8–98.0)99.2 [1,680/1,693] (98.7–99.6)95.5 [42/44] (84.9–98.7)99.9 [1,779/1,780] (99.7–100)93.4 [142/152] (88.3–96.4)99.3 [881/887] (98.5–99.7)
    Female urine
        Asymptomatic92.3 [48/52] (81.8–97.0)99.7 [747/749] (99.0–99.9)88.9 [16/18] (67.2–96.9)99.5 [779/783] (98.7–99.8)93.1 [27/29] (78.0–98.1)98.2 [272/277] (95.8–99.2)
        Symptomatic91.1 [82/90] (83.4–95.4)99.4 [952/958] (98.6–99.7)100 [28/28] (87.9–100)99.9 [1,019/1,020] (99.4–100)92.8 [116/125] (86.9–96.2)99.8 [615/616] (99.1–100)
        Total91.5 [130/142] (85.8–95.1)99.5 [1,699/1,707] (99.1–99.8)95.7 [44/46] (85.5–98.8)99.7 [1,798/1,803] (99.4–99.9)92.9 [143/154] (87.7–96.0)99.3 [887/893] (98.5–99.7)
    Male urine
        Asymptomatic98.6 [69/70] (92.3–99.7)99.5 [378/380] (98.1–99.9)80.0 [4/5] (37.6–96.4)100 [447/447] (99.1–100)No evaluation of trichomonas testing was performed in male urineNo evaluation of trichomonas testing was performed in male urine
        Symptomatic94.6 [105/111] (88.7–97.5)99.3 [267/269] (97.399.8)100 [103/103] (96.4–100)100 [285/285] (98.7–100)
        Total96.1 [174/181] (92.2–98.1)99.4 [645/649] (98.4–99.8)99.1 [107/108] (94.9–99.8)100 [732/732] (99.5–100)
    • ↵a Values shown are percentage [number of positive results/number of infections] (95% confidence interval).

  • TABLE 3

    Performance of female samples when comparing the BD MAX to CTQ/GCQ and Aptima assays (AC2 and ATV) using a rolling infection status calculation

    Disease/sample typeSensitivitySpecificity
    MAXaQx assaysaAptima assaysaP valueMAXaQx assaysaAptima assaysaP value
    Chlamydia
        Endocervical95.7 [132/138] (90.8–98.0)90.3 [131/145] (84.4–94.2)94.6 [135/145] (87.8–96.2)0.41499.2 [1,681/1,694] (98.7–99.6)99.6 [1,701/1,708] (99.2–99.8)99.4 [1,701/1,711] (98.9–99.7)0.380
        Female urine91.5 [130/142] (85.8–95.1)88.3 [128/145] (82.0–92.5)87.0 [127/146] (80.6–91.5)0.41499.5 [1,699/1,707] (99.1–99.8)99.8 [1,709/1,713] (99.4–99.9)99.6 [1,701/1,708] (99.2–99.8)0.380
    Gonorrhea
        Endocervical95.5 [42/44] (84.9–98.7)97.8 [45/46] (88.7–99.6)93.6 [44/47] (82.8–97.8)0.76099.9 [1,780/1,781] (99.7–100)99.7 [1,801/1,807] (99.3–99.8)99.9 [1,808/1,810] (99.6–100)0.170
        Female urine95.7 [44/46] (85.5–98.8)97.8 [45/46] (88.7–99.6)93.6 [44/47] (82.8–97.8)0.76099.7 [1,798/1,803] (99.4–99.9)99.7 [1,806/1,812] (99.3–99.8)99.9 [1,805/1,807] (99.6–100)0.170
    Trichomonas
        Vaginal swabs96.6 [143/148] (92.3–98.5)Not done98.0 [145/148] (94.2–99.3)1.098.8 [858/868] (97.9–99.4)Not done98.2 [852/868] (97.0–98.9)1.0
    • ↵a Values shown are percentage [number of positive results/number of infections] (95% confidence interval).

  • TABLE 4

    Head-to-head comparison of MAX TV and other assays for detection of trichomonas

    Test typeMAX TV (−)MAX TV (+)Percent agreementa (95% CI)Overall agreement (95% CI)
    Wet prep (−)88968NPA = 92.9 (91.9–94.6)93.2 (91.5–94.6)
    Wet prep (+)388PPA = 96.7 (90.8–98.9)
    Culture (−)88611NPA = 98.8 (97.8–99.3)98.4 (97.4–99.0)
    Culture (+)6145PPA = 96.0 (91.6–98.2)
    ATV (−)8523NPA = 99.6 (99.0–99.9)98.6 (97.7–99.2)
    ATV (+)11150PPA = 93.2 (88.2–96.1)
    • ↵a Positive (PPA) and negative (NPA) percent agreement calculated on the presumption that the reference method is 100% accurate.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Combined Testing for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Trichomonas by Use of the BD Max CT/GC/TV Assay with Genitourinary Specimen Types
Barbara Van Der Pol, James A. Williams, DeAnna Fuller, Stephanie N. Taylor, Edward W. Hook III
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Dec 2016, 55 (1) 155-164; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01766-16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Combined Testing for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Trichomonas by Use of the BD Max CT/GC/TV Assay with Genitourinary Specimen Types
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Combined Testing for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Trichomonas by Use of the BD Max CT/GC/TV Assay with Genitourinary Specimen Types
Barbara Van Der Pol, James A. Williams, DeAnna Fuller, Stephanie N. Taylor, Edward W. Hook III
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Dec 2016, 55 (1) 155-164; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01766-16
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Chlamydia trachomatis
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
sexually transmitted diseases
trichomonas
Chlamydia trachomatis
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Trichomonas vaginalis
molecular diagnostics
sexually transmitted infections

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X