Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Simultaneous Identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Its Ciprofloxacin Susceptibility Status

Sumudu R. Perera, Nurul H. Khan, Irene Martin, Ali Taheri, Rajinder P. Parti, Paul N. Levett, Greg B. Horsman, Anthony Kusalik, Jo-Anne R. Dillon
Sandra S. Richter, Editor
Sumudu R. Perera
aVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization—International Vaccine Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
bDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nurul H. Khan
aVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization—International Vaccine Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irene Martin
cNational Microbiology Laboratory, Streptococcus and STI Unit, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali Taheri
aVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization—International Vaccine Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rajinder P. Parti
aVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization—International Vaccine Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul N. Levett
dGovernment of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan Disease Control Laboratory, Regina, SK, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Greg B. Horsman
dGovernment of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan Disease Control Laboratory, Regina, SK, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony Kusalik
eDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jo-Anne R. Dillon
aVaccine and Infectious Disease Organization—International Vaccine Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
bDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra S. Richter
Cleveland Clinic
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00855-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assay was designed for the simultaneous identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and its ciprofloxacin susceptibility status. A SYBR green-based multiplex RT-PCR format was used; it comprised two different forward primers and a common reverse primer to detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in gyrA of N. gonorrhoeae. The primer pairs were evaluated for their sensitivity and specificity using genomic DNA from 254 N. gonorrhoeae isolates (82 were ciprofloxacin susceptible and 172 were ciprofloxacin resistant) and 23 non-N. gonorrhoeae species isolates. The performance of the primers was validated using genomic DNA from 100 different N. gonorrhoeae isolates (46 were ciprofloxacin susceptible and 54 were ciprofloxacin resistant) and 52 non-N. gonorrhoeae isolates. The latter panel was revalidated by testing 99 (46 isolates were ciprofloxacin susceptible and 53 isolates were ciprofloxacin resistant) of the N. gonorrhoeae isolates and 23 non-N. gonorrhoeae isolates. These primers detected N. gonorrhoeae and its ciprofloxacin susceptibility status with over 99% sensitivity and specificity for all panels tested. This assay has the potential to be an inexpensive and rapid test for the simultaneous identification of N. gonorrhoeae and its ciprofloxacin susceptibility status.

INTRODUCTION

Gonorrhea remains an important global public health concern, with 78 million new infections worldwide each year (1). Cases of gonorrhea are underreported, especially because most infections (almost half of the women infected) are asymptomatic; such infections can have major long-term and negative impacts on reproductive health, especially in women (2). Gonococcal infections can only be cured with antibiotics; there are no vaccines against this disease (3, 4). Over time, Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates have developed resistance to every class of antibiotic introduced for therapy, including third-generation cephalosporins, which were the last class of antibiotic used in single-dose therapy (3, 5). The recommended treatment in many countries for gonococcal infections now comprises co-therapy with two antibiotics, azithromycin coupled with ceftriaxone (6). There is increased urgency for new strategies to treat gonococcal infections, either with new antibiotics, antibiotic combinations, or possibly the use of older antimicrobials where susceptibility to the agent is known.

The identification of N. gonorrhoeae in high-income countries is usually accomplished by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) (7–10). A limitation of NAATs is that susceptibility testing cannot be completed at present, as such testing requires the pathogen to be cultured and molecular testing for AMS is still under evaluation (3, 5, 11, 12). Due to the widespread use of NAATs, AMS testing of N. gonorrhoeae isolates has significantly declined in resource-rich countries (12, 13). Such testing is often beyond the technical capability of resource-limited settings.

Ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic, was first introduced for the treatment of gonococcal infections in 1985; by 2006, in the United States, ciprofloxacin resistance was observed in 13.8% of isolates (11, 14). The population-based recommendation of the World Health Organization is that when resistance to an antibiotic exceeds 5% of isolates tested, the antibiotic should be discontinued for treatment (5, 6). Consequently, from 2007 ciprofloxacin has not been recommended for the treatment for N. gonorrhoeae infections in the United States (15). In Canada, between 2004 and 2014, ciprofloxacin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae isolates increased from 6.3% to 34.0% and is no longer recommended for the primary treatment of gonorrhea (16, 17). It is notable, however, that in in the United States ∼80% of N. gonorrhoeae isolates are susceptible to ciprofloxacin (18). The issue is that individual patients infected with a susceptible isolate must be identified before this antibiotic can be considered a treatment option. Thus, there is a need for a point-of-care test (POCT) that might identify those infected with ciprofloxacin-susceptible N. gonorrhoeae isolates.

Ciprofloxacin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae is caused by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within DNA gyrase A (gyrA; amino acid positions S91 and D95) and parC (amino acid positions S88 and E91) (3, 5, 19, 20). Studies have shown that more than 99% of ciprofloxacin-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates carry gyrA S91 and/or D95 mutations, making these targets potentially diagnostic for resistance (21–23).

We report on the design and evaluation of a test that can be used simultaneously to identify N. gonorrhoeae and to determine its ciprofloxacin susceptibility status in a single multiplex assay. Our test was over 99% sensitive and specific for the identification of the ciprofloxacin susceptibility status of cultured N. gonorrhoeae.

RESULTS

Specificity and sensitivity of gyrA primers for identification of N. gonorrhoeae either in single PCR or multiplex formats.Individually and in multiplex, gyrA-W and gyrA-M primers did not amplify DNA from any of the non-N. gonorrhoeae isolates (Table 1), indicating 100% specificity. A nonspecific melt curve was produced by the gyrA-M primer pair for Lactobacillus jensenii that was not reproduced on the repeated analyses. Similarly, the gyrA-W primer pair produced nonspecific melt curves for Neisseriaanimaloris and Neisseria meningitidis, which were not observed in repeated experiments. Nonspecific melt curves were considered negative amplifications, as these melt curve temperatures fell beyond the expected range and did not interfere with the melt curve interpretation of the ciprofloxacin susceptibility status of N. gonorrhoeae. The gyrA-W primer pair and gyrA-M primer pair amplified 57% and 58%, respectively, of the 254 N. gonorrhoeae isolates (Table 1). In the multiplex format with three primers (2 forward primers and a common reverse primer), all 254 N. gonorrhoeae isolates were amplified and no non-N. gonorrhoeae isolates were amplified (Table 1). Therefore, the multiplex assay showed 100% sensitivity and specificity for the identification of N. gonorrhoeae.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Sensitivity and specificity of gyrA-W and gyrA-M primer pairs in multiplex format for identification of N. gonorrhoeae isolates and determination of their ciprofloxacin susceptibility status

Multiplex primers in ascertaining ciprofloxacin susceptibility status.A total of 94 N. gonorrhoeae isolates (a subset of panel 1) was analyzed by multiplex RT-PCR; 47 isolates were previously determined to be ciprofloxacin susceptible (MIC 0.002 to 0.063 μg/ml) and another 47 isolates were determined as ciprofloxacin intermediate/resistant (MIC 0.125 to 64 μg/ml). The putative ciprofloxacin susceptibility status of the isolates was precisely ascertained by melt curve analyses, which distinctly differentiated between ciprofloxacin susceptible and intermediate/resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates. Susceptible N. gonorrhoeae produced melt curve values of ∼78.0°C and intermediate/resistant N. gonorrhoeae produced melt curves values of 80.0 to 83.0°C. Mutations in the gyrA sequence resulting in S91 and D95 amino acid alterations were distinguished using the multiplex assay (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, the multiplex assay performed equally well in differentiating WHO N. gonorrhoeae reference strains into ciprofloxacin susceptible and intermediate/resistant groups (Fig. 1B). The gyrA primers in multiplex format successfully identified WHO-B, C, F, O, and P strains as ciprofloxacin sensitive (melt curve, ∼78.0°C), and WHO-K, L, and M strains as intermediate/resistant (melt curve, 80.0 to 83.0°C).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Multiplex RT-PCR melt curve representation of ciprofloxacin-susceptible and intermediate/resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates. (A) Ciprofloxacin-susceptible (n = 47) and intermediate/resistant (n = 47) N. gonorrhoeae isolates (subset of panel 1). Blue lines represent susceptible isolates, orange lines represent intermediate/resistant isolates, and black lines represent no template negative controls. (B) WHO N. gonorrhoeae reference strains (n = 8). Strains B, C, F, O, and P are susceptible (melt curve ∼78°C), and strains K, L, and M are intermediate/resistant (melt curve 80.0-83.0°C).

The ciprofloxacin susceptibility status of panel 1 isolates had previously been determined with MIC analyses: 82 isolates were susceptible (MIC 0.002 to 0.063 μg/ml), while 172 isolates were intermediate (n = 7; MIC 0.125 to 0.5 μg/ml) or resistant (n = 165; MIC 2 to 64 μg/ml). With multiplex RT-PCR, 171/172 isolates were characterized as ciprofloxacin intermediate/resistant and 82/82 isolates were characterized as ciprofloxacin susceptible (Table 1). One resistant isolate was incorrectly classified as susceptible after amplification. Thus, gyrA primers in multiplex were 100% sensitive and 99% specific for the identification of ciprofloxacin susceptibility status. Similarly, the primers were 99% sensitive and 100% specific in the identification of ciprofloxacin intermediate/resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates (Table 1).

Validation of RT-PCR multiplex tests for N. gonorrhoeae identification and ciprofloxacin susceptibility status determination.The gyrA primers were used to ascertain gonococcal identification and susceptibility status with panel 2 isolates. Used as single primer pairs, gyrA-W was 94% sensitive and 100% specific for the identification of N. gonorrhoeae and gyrA-M was 100% sensitive and specific for N. gonorrhoeae identification (Table 2). Some nonspecific peaks were observed with the gyrA-M primer pair and interpreted to be nonspecific amplifications: short peak melt curves with temperatures 84.1°C, 86.9°C, and 87.2°C were observed for Atopobium vaginae, N. animaloris, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, respectively. Neisseria perflava produced a melt curve at 76.7°C for the gyrA-W primer pair but this observation was not reproduced in repeated experiments (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Validation and re-validation of primers gyrA-W and gyrA-M by RT-PCR using panels 2 and 3 N. gonorrhoeae and non-N. gonorrhoeae isolatesa

With panel 3, which comprised DNA from isolates in panel 2, primer pair gyrA-W was 93% sensitive and 100% specific for N. gonorrhoeae identification while gyrA-M was 99% sensitive and 100% specific for N. gonorrhoeae identification (Table 2). In multiplex analyses, the primers were 100% sensitive and specific for N. gonorrhoeae identification. Amplification of N. animaloris and N. meningitides produced melt curves at 76.7°C for gyrA-W, but was not reproduced on replication and the result was interpreted as negative amplification.

DISCUSSION

A method for the simultaneous identification of the pathogen N. gonorrhoeae and its ciprofloxacin susceptibility status has been described. The gyrA-M forward primer is unique to N. gonorrhoeae and specific to ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates. The gyrA-W forward primer is specific to ciprofloxacin-susceptible isolates. These primers, paired with the common reverse primer, were not anticipated to be highly sensitive for gonococcal identification when used as individual pairs; however, the multiplex test format had high sensitivity and specificity (>99%) for detecting N. gonorrhoeae and its ciprofloxacin susceptibility status in a single amplification.

The gyrA and parC genomic regions of N. gonorrhoeae are associated with ciprofloxacin resistance (19). parC mutations in association with gyrA mutations maintain higher levels of overall resistance (MIC of ≥1) whereas lower levels of resistance are associated with gyrA mutations only. On the other hand, parC mutations alone are not associated with ciprofloxacin resistance (22, 24, 25). In our study, we considered gyrA mutations alone and clearly identified the ciprofloxacin-susceptible and resistant isolates in a single multiplex RT-PCR assay. Thus, our results support the findings by others and demonstrate that the gyrA region alone is sufficient for the determination of ciprofloxacin susceptibility status (13, 18, 22, 26). We determined through DNA sequencing that the majority of isolates with intermediate susceptibility in our study carried mutations only at the S91 or D95 position, and not both (Table 3); one isolate with intermediate susceptibility in panel 2 had mutations at both S91 and D95 positions. Similarly, the majority of resistant isolates carried mutations at both S91 (S91F) and D95 positions (either D95G, D95A, or D95N). One resistant isolate in panel 1 had a mutation only at the D95 position. Thus, we showed that ciprofloxacin resistance can arise due to mutations at both S91 and D95 amino acid positions, and analysis of the S91 position alone is not sufficient for comprehensive determination of ciprofloxacin susceptibility status.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Single nucleotide polymorphisms observed at amino acid positions S91 and D95 of N. gonorrhoeae isolates based on gyrA amplicon sequencinga

To our knowledge, this is the first report of simultaneous detection of N. gonorrhoeae as well as of its ciprofloxacin susceptibility status in a single and simple test that is highly specific, sensitive, inexpensive, and rapid. The costs associated with specimen culturing and training of laboratory personnel, as well as the current costs of NAATs, are beyond the economic capabilities of many resource-limited settings. The DNA extraction and PCR cost per sample in the assay discussed in our study (Can$11.07) is about 2 times less than the cost per sample incurred by the current N. gonorrhoeae diagnostic NAATs or the costs associated with identification and SNP testing at the National Microbiology Laboratory (estimated at Can$75/sample, inclusive of labor). Thus, the assay discussed in our work is far more affordable than the current NAATs for N. gonorrhoeae diagnosis. One study demonstrated detection of N. gonorrhoeae and its ciprofloxacin susceptibility status, but this assay required three consecutive tests for a clear interpretation (27). Several recent publications introduced RT-PCR-based methods for detection of mutations at the gryA S91 locus from clinical specimens (18, 26, 28). However, these analyses were restricted only to the S91 locus and the assays could be more likely to have errors if ciprofloxacin resistance arose through mutations in the D95 locus. In our work, we have observed through amplicon sequencing that ciprofloxacin resistance primarily arose due to mutations in both S91 and D95 loci, while intermediate resistance mainly arose due to mutations in either S91 or D95 loci (Table 3).

Although the results of this study highlight the utility of this multiplex RT-PCR method for identifying N. gonorrhoeae and determining its ciprofloxacin susceptibility status, caution is needed, as only a very limited number of non-N. gonorrhoeae isolates were tested. In addition, further studies are needed to investigate if the assay has clinical applicability by testing clinical specimens directly with the aim of personalized care (18).

Our findings show promise for the development of a POCT for the identification of N. gonorrhoeae and its ciprofloxacin susceptibility status. POCTs facilitate the diagnosis at the health care provider's office and avoid unnecessary treatment delays. This eliminates the need for patients to return for post diagnosis treatments and prevents unwanted complications and disease transmission (27). Given its probable low cost and relative ease of use, this assay could have major implications for resource-poor, high disease burden countries (29, 30). Furthermore, our assay may prove helpful to clinicians and laboratories to respond to infectious disease control organizations, increase surveillance for ciprofloxacin resistance, and present coherent findings for epidemiological and surveillance purposes. With gyrA-based diagnosis of gonococcal AMS status, the utilization of ciprofloxacin could be increased, thereby reducing the use of last-resort antimicrobials (18). Thus, a rapid and reliable assay, such as the platform discussed by our work, would improve the understanding of the extent of the disease worldwide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.Two different N. gonorrhoeae strain panels were used and comprised DNA extracted from clinically derived cultured specimens. Panel 1 comprised 254 gonococcal and 23 nongonococcal isolates (Table 4). Panel 1 N. gonorrhoeae isolates were chosen randomly from the Dillon Culture Collection, which consisted of isolates previously reported by Vidovic et al. (31) and Liao et al. (33). A core feature of all selections was their different susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin. The WHO reference isolates were reported in Unemo et al. (34). A random collection of non-Neisseria species isolates and other Neisseria species isolates were obtained from the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) (Winnipeg, MB, Canada). The second unrelated panel comprised 100 gonococcal and 52 nongonococcal isolates from across Canada and was selected at the NML to include isolates having different susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin. A subsample of panel 2 (panel 3) containing DNA from 99 gonococcal and 23 nongonococcal isolates was used for revalidation. One isolate from panel 2 was eliminated in panel 3 due to inconsistent results. WHO N. gonorrhoeae reference strains for ciprofloxacin susceptibility determination included strains F, O, P, B, and C (susceptible), G (intermediate), and M, N, K, and L (resistant) (34).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

N. gonorrhoeae and non-N. gonorrhoeae isolates used in this study

N. gonorrhoeae isolates were stored at −80°C in brain heart infusion broth (Difco BD Bioscience) with 20% glycerol. Aliquots from frozen inoculum were cultured on GC medium base (Difco BD Bioscience) supplemented with 1% Kellogg's defined supplement. Plates were incubated at 35°C with 5 to 7% CO2 in a humid environment for 18 to 24 h (35).

DNA extraction was performed using a QIAamp DNA minikit (catalog no. 51306; Qiagen, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. DNA was quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) and 50 ng/μl of DNA from each isolate was used for RT-PCRs.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.The MICs of all N. gonorrhoeae isolates to ciprofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville ON, Canada) were assessed by the agar dilution method (35). AMS criteria recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) were used to interpret ciprofloxacin MICs as follows: sensitive (≤0.06 μg/ml), intermediate (0.125 to 0.50 μg/ml), and resistant (≥1.0 μg/ml) (35).

Primers and real-time (RT) PCR.Two different forward primers and one common reverse primer with homology to N. gonorrhoeaegyrA were designed (U.S. utility patent no. 62/088,332) using Primer-BLAST (36). Primer pair gyrA-W comprised forward primer gyrA-W-F (5′GCGATTCCGCAGTTTACGA3′) and the common reverse primer gyrA-R (5′CGAAATTTTGCGCCATACGGACGAT3′). Primer pair gyrA-M comprised forward primer gyrA-M-F (5′ TACCACCCCCACGGCGATTT3′) and the common reverse primer gyrA-R.

RT-PCR (for panels 1 and panel 3) was performed using an Applied Biosystems (AB) StepOnePlus RT-PCR system (catalog no. 4376600; Life Technologies, Inc.) on a 96-well platform (catalog no. 4346907) and for panel 2 using a ViiA 7 RT-D2 RT-PCR instrument (serial number 278880994; Life Technologies, Inc.) on a 96-well platform with the SYBR Select Master Mix Reagent kit (catalog no. 4472908; Life Technologies, Inc.). PCR mixtures contained 5 μl of 2× SYBR green master mix, 0.25 μl of each primer (10 μM), and 2 μl of DNA template (50 ng/μl). The final reaction volume was adjusted to 10 μl with deionized water. PCR was conducted according to the manufacturer's guidelines with the following modifications: initial holding and activation at 50°C for 2 min followed by a secondary holding at 95°C for 2 min. PCR was performed for 25 cycles at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 30 s. The post-PCR melt curve was performed between temperatures of 60°C to 95°C with 0.3°C temperature increments. DNA from WHO strain F was used as a positive control and an aliquot without any template was used as a negative control. Data were collected at 50°C in the holding stage, at 60°C in the annealing stage (for amplification data), and during the melt curve process (for melt curve data).

Multiplex RT-PCR analyses.For multiplex RT-PCR analyses, reaction mixtures contained 5 μl of 2× SYBR green master mix, 0.25 μl of each of the forward primers (10 μM), 0.25 μl of the common reverse primer (10 μM), and 2 μl of the DNA template (50 ng/μl). The final reaction volume was adjusted to 10 μl with deionized water. The method for multiplex RT-PCR was the same as described above. Initially, the sensitivity and specificity of the primers were analyzed using purified DNA from 254 N. gonorrhoeae and 23 non-N. gonorrhoeae isolates (panel 1 in Table 4) using single primer pairs and in multiplex format.

These tests were validated with the same primers and methods but using panel 2 isolates. A subset of DNA from panel 2 isolates was revalidated as panel 3 (Table 4).

Calculation of specificity and sensitivity.Specificity and sensitivity were calculated using the formulas described before (37).

DNA sequencing.The gyrA genomic region of N. gonorrhoeae was PCR-amplified with primers gyrA-F (ACTGTACGCGATGCACGAGC) and gyrA-R (TCTGCCAGCATTTCATGTGAG) (19). Sanger sequencing of the amplicon was performed at Eurofins Genomics (Louisville, KY).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a Grand Challenges Canada Grant (S5-0398-01) and a Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation (SHRF) Collaborative Innovation Grant (no. 3380) to J.R.D., as well as by funding from the University of Saskatchewan (no. 417069). S.R.P. was partially supported by a University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine scholarship.

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 31 May 2017.
    • Returned for modification 29 June 2017.
    • Accepted 6 August 2017.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 16 August 2017.
  • Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Newman l. Rowley J,
    2. Vander Hoorn S,
    3. Wijesooriya NS,
    4. Unemo M,
    5. Low N,
    6. Stevens G,
    7. Gottlieb S,
    8. Kiarie J,
    9. Temmerman M
    . 2015. Global estimates of the prevalence and incidence of four curable sexually transmitted infections in 2012 based on systematic review and global reporting. PLoS One10:e0143304. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Walker CK,
    2. Sweet RL
    . 2011. Gonorrhea infection in women: prevalence, effects, screening, and management. Int J Womens Health3:197–206. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S13427.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Dillon JR,
    2. Parti RP,
    3. Thakur SD
    . 2015. Antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: will infections be untreatable in the future?Culture35:1–8.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Unemo M,
    2. Nicholas RA
    . 2012. Emergence of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and untreatable gonorrhea. Future Microbiol7:1401–1422. doi:10.2217/fmb.12.117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Unemo M,
    2. Shafer WM
    . 2014. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoea in the 21st century: past, evolution and the future. Clin Microbiol Rev27:587–613. doi:10.1128/CMR.00010-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    World Health Organization. 2016. WHO guidelines for the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/gonorrhoea-treatment-guidelines/en/.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Tabrizi SN,
    2. Unemo M,
    3. Limnios AE,
    4. Hogan TR,
    5. Hjelmevoll SO,
    6. Garland SM,
    7. Tapsall J
    . 2011. Evaluation of six commercial nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and other Neisseria species. J Clin Microbiol49:3610–3615. doi:10.1128/JCM.01217-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Pope CF,
    2. Hay P,
    3. Alexander S,
    4. Capaldi K,
    5. Dave J,
    6. Sadiq ST,
    7. Ison CA,
    8. Planche T
    . 2010. Positive predictive value of the Becton Dickinson VIPER system and the ProbeTec GC Qx assay, in extracted mode, for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Infect86:465–469. doi:10.1136/sti.2010.044065.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Moncada J,
    2. Clark CB,
    3. Holden J,
    4. Hook EW III,
    5. Gaydos CA,
    6. Schachter J
    . 2017. Stability studies on dry swabs and wet mailed swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Aptima assays. J Clin Microbiol55:971–977. doi:10.1128/JCM.02235-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Graham RMA,
    2. Doyle CJ,
    3. Jennison AV
    . 2017. Epidemiological typing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and detection of markers associated with antimicrobial resistance directly from urine samples using next generation sequencing. Sex Transm Infect93:65–67. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2015-052422.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Goire N,
    2. Lahra MM,
    3. Chen M,
    4. Donovan B,
    5. Fairley C,
    6. Guy R,
    7. Kaldor J,
    8. Regan D,
    9. Ward J,
    10. Nissen MD,
    11. Sloots TP,
    12. Whiley DM
    . 2014. Molecular approaches to enhance surveillance of gonococcal antimicrobial resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol12:223–229. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Public Health Agency of Canada. 2016. National surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibilities of Neisseria gonorrhoeae annual summary 2014. Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/canada/health-canada/migration/healthy-canadians/publications/drugs-products-medicaments-produits/2014-neisseria/alt/surveillance-gonorrhoeae-2014-eng.pdf.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Peterson SW,
    2. Martin I,
    3. Demczuk W,
    4. Bharat A,
    5. Hoang L,
    6. Wylie J,
    7. Allen V,
    8. Lefebvre B,
    9. Tyrell G,
    10. Horsman G,
    11. Haldane D,
    12. Garceau R,
    13. Wong T,
    14. Mulvery MR
    . 2015. Molecular assay for detection of ciprofloxacin resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from cultures and clinical nucleic acid amplification test specimens. J Clin Microbiol53(11):3606–3608. doi:10.1128/JCM.01632-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Goldstein E,
    2. Kirkcaldy RD,
    3. Reshef D,
    4. Berman S,
    5. Weinstock H,
    6. Sabeti P,
    7. Del Rio C,
    8. Hall G,
    9. Hook EW,
    10. Lipsitch M
    . 2012. Factors related to increasing prevalence of resistance to ciprofloxacin and other antimicrobial drugs in Neisseria gonorrhoeae, United States. Emerg Infect Dis18(8):1290–1297. doi:10.3201/eid1808.111202.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016. Antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea basic informatio. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. https://www.cdc.gov/std/gonorrhea/arg/basic.htm/ . Accessed 7 July 2016.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kropp RY,
    2. Steben M
    . 2006. Canadian guidelines on sexually transmitted infections, 2006 edition. Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/std-mts/pdf/whatsnew-quoineuf_e.pdf.
  17. 17.↵
    Public Health Agency of Canada. 2013. Section 5-6: Canadian guidelines on sexually transmitted infections—management and treatment of specific infections—gonococcal infections. Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/std-mts/sti-its/cgsti-ldcits/section-5-6-eng.php. Accessed 7 July 2016.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Allan-Blitz LT,
    2. Humphries RM,
    3. Hemarajata P,
    4. Bhatti A,
    5. Pandori MW,
    6. Siedner MJ,
    7. Klausner JD
    . 2017. Implementation of a rapid genotypic assay to promote targeted ciprofloxacin therapy of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in a large health system. Clin Infect Dis64:1268–1270. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw864.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Belland RJ,
    2. Morrison SG,
    3. Ison C,
    4. Huang WM
    . 1994. Neisseria gonorrhoeae acquires mutations in analogous regions of gyrA and parC in fluoroquinolone resistant isolates. Mol Microbiol14:371–380. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01297.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Giles JA,
    2. Falconio J,
    3. Yuenger JD,
    4. Zenilman JM,
    5. Dan M,
    6. Bash MC
    . 2004. Quinolone resistance-determining region mutations and por type of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates: resistance surveillance and typing by molecular methodologies. J Infect Dis189:2085–2093. doi:10.1086/386312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Zhao LH,
    2. Zhao SP
    . 2012. TaqMan real-time quantitative PCR assay for the detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Curr Microbiol65:692–695. doi:10.1007/s00284-012-0212-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Siedner MJ,
    2. Pandori M,
    3. Castro L,
    4. Barry P,
    5. Whittington WLH,
    6. Liska S,
    7. Klausner JD
    . 2007. Real-time PCR assay for detection of quinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine samples. J Clin Microbiol45(4):1250–1254. doi:10.1128/JCM.01909-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Trembizki E,
    2. Guy R,
    3. Donovan B,
    4. Kaldor JM,
    5. Lahra MM,
    6. Whiley DM
    . 2016. further evidence to support the individualised treatment of gonorrhoeae with ciprofloxacin. Lancet Infect Dis16(9):1005–1006. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30271-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Yokoi S,
    3. Kawamura Y,
    4. Maeda S,
    5. Ezaki T,
    6. Deguchi T
    . 2002. Rapid detection of quinolone resistance-associated gyrA mutations in Neisseria gonorrhoeae with a LightCycler. J Infect Chemother8:145–150. doi:10.1007/s101560200025.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Lindback E,
    2. Gharizadeh B,
    3. Ataker F,
    4. Airell A,
    5. Jalal S,
    6. Nyren P,
    7. Wretlind B
    . 2005. DNA gyrase gene in Neisseria gonorrhoeae as indicator for resistance to ciprofloxacin and species verification. Int J STD AIDS16(2):142–147. doi:10.1258/0956462053057675.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Allan-Blitz LT,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Klausner J
    . 2017. wild-type gyrase A genotype of Neisseria gonorrhoeae predicts in vitro susceptibility to ciprofloxacin: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Dis44(5):261–265. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000591.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. Gaydos CA,
    2. Van Der Pol B,
    3. Jett-Goheen M,
    4. Barnes M,
    5. Quinn N,
    6. Clark C,
    7. Daniel GE,
    8. Dixon PB,
    9. Hook EW
    . 2013. Performance of the Cepheid CT/NG Xpert Rapid PCR test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol51:1666–1672. doi:10.1128/JCM.03461-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Buckley C,
    2. Trembizki E,
    3. Donovan B,
    4. Chen M,
    5. Freeman K,
    6. Guy R,
    7. Kundu R,
    8. Lahra MM,
    9. Regan DG,
    10. Smith H,
    11. Whiley DM
    . 2016. A real-time PCR assay for direct characterization of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae GyrA 91 locus associated with ciprofloxacin susceptibility. J Antimicrob Chemother71:353–356. doi:10.1093/jac/dkv366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Watchirs Smith LA,
    2. Hillman R,
    3. Ward J,
    4. Whiley DM,
    5. Causer L,
    6. Skov S,
    7. Donovan B,
    8. Kaldor J,
    9. Guy R
    . 2013. Point-of-care tests for the diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection: a systematic review of operational and performance characteristics. Sex Transm Infect89:320–326. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2012-050656.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Herbst de Cortina S,
    2. Bristow CC,
    3. Davey DJ,
    4. Klausner JD
    . 2016. A systematic review of point of care testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol2016:4386127. doi:10.1155/2016/4386127.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Vidovic S,
    2. Caron C,
    3. Taheri A,
    4. Thakur SD,
    5. Read TD,
    6. Kusalik A,
    7. Dillon JA
    . 2014. Using crude whole-genome assemblies of Neisseria gonorrhoeae as a platform for strain analysis: clonal spread of gonorrhea infection in Saskatchewan, Canada. J Clin Microbiol52:3772–3776. doi:10.1128/JCM.01502-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.
    1. Vidovic S,
    2. Horsman GB,
    3. Liao M,
    4. Dillon JR
    . 2011. Influence of conserved and hypervariable genetic markers on genotyping circulating strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. PLoS One6:e28259. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Liao M,
    2. Helgeson S,
    3. Gu WM,
    4. Yang Y,
    5. Jolly AM,
    6. Dillon JR
    . 2009. Comparison of Neisseria gonorrhoeae multiantigen sequence typing and porB sequence analysis for identification of clusters of N. gonorrhoeae isolates. J Clin Microbiol47(2):489–491. doi:10.1128/JCM.01612-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Unemo M,
    2. Fasth O,
    3. Fredlund H,
    4. Limnios A,
    5. Tapsall J
    . 2009. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of the 2008 WHO Neisseria gonorrhoeae reference strain panel intended for global quality assurance and quality control of gonococcal antimicrobial resistance surveillance for public health purposes. J Antimicrob Chemother63:1142–1151. doi:10.1093/jac/dkp098.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2017. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 27th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  36. 36.↵
    1. Ye J,
    2. Coulouris G,
    3. Zaretskaya I,
    4. Cutcutache I,
    5. Rozen S,
    6. Madden TL
    . 2012. Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinformatics2012:134. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-134.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    1. Lalkhen AG,
    2. McCluskey A
    . 2008. Clinical tests: sensitivity and specificity. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain8:221–223. doi:10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkn041.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Simultaneous Identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Its Ciprofloxacin Susceptibility Status
Sumudu R. Perera, Nurul H. Khan, Irene Martin, Ali Taheri, Rajinder P. Parti, Paul N. Levett, Greg B. Horsman, Anthony Kusalik, Jo-Anne R. Dillon
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Oct 2017, 55 (11) 3201-3209; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00855-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Simultaneous Identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Its Ciprofloxacin Susceptibility Status
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Simultaneous Identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Its Ciprofloxacin Susceptibility Status
Sumudu R. Perera, Nurul H. Khan, Irene Martin, Ali Taheri, Rajinder P. Parti, Paul N. Levett, Greg B. Horsman, Anthony Kusalik, Jo-Anne R. Dillon
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Oct 2017, 55 (11) 3201-3209; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00855-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Bacterial Agents
ciprofloxacin
gonorrhea
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
real-time polymerase chain reaction
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
antimicrobial susceptibility (AMS)
ciprofloxacin
gyrA
multiplex RT-PCR assay

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X