Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virology

Reactivity of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Structural Proteins to Antibodies against Porcine Enteric Coronaviruses: Diagnostic Implications

Luis Gabriel Gimenez-Lirola, Jianqiang Zhang, Jose Antonio Carrillo-Avila, Qi Chen, Ronaldo Magtoto, Korakrit Poonsuk, David H. Baum, Pablo Piñeyro, Jeffrey Zimmerman
Michael J. Loeffelholz, Editor
Luis Gabriel Gimenez-Lirola
aCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianqiang Zhang
aCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jose Antonio Carrillo-Avila
bDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Granada-ibs, Granada, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qi Chen
aCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronaldo Magtoto
aCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Korakrit Poonsuk
aCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David H. Baum
aCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pablo Piñeyro
aCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Zimmerman
aCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Loeffelholz
University of Texas Medical Branch
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02507-16
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    PEDV multiplex (6-plex) fluorescent microbead-based immunoassay (FMIA) sample/positive-result (S/P) ratios of serum antibody (IgG) responses (means and standard errors [SE]) over time to the 5 recombinant polypeptides (S1 non-S-INDEL, S1 S-INDEL, N, M, and E) and to the whole-virus (WV) antigen in pigs (n = 12 per group) inoculated with PEDV (USA/IN/2013/19338E), TGEV Miller (ATCC VR-1740), TGEV Purdue (ATCC VR-763), PRCV (ATCC VR-2384), or PDCoV (USA/IL/2014) or with a negative control (sham inoculation). Different letters denoted statistical differences (P = ≤0.05). Samples above the estimated S/P cutoff (dashed line) were considered positive.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Performance of PEDV whole-virus (WV) indirect ELISA on experimental samples of precisely known porcine coronavirus infectious status, i.e., pigs inoculated with PEDV (USA/IN/2013/19338E; n = 12), TGEV Miller (ATCC VR-1740; n = 12), TGEV Purdue (ATCC VR-763; n = 12), PRCV (ATCC VR-2384; n = 12), or PDCoV (USA/IL/2014; n = 12) or with a negative control (sham inoculation; n = 12). (A) Sample/positive result (S/P) ratios of serum antibody (IgG) responses (mean, SE) over time in each inoculation group. (B) Distribution of cumulative ELISA WV IgG sample/positive result (S/P) ratios in serum samples (n = 792 total; n = 132 per group) collected at DPI −7, 0, 3, 7, 10, 14, 17, 21, 28, 35, and 42. Different letters denoted statistical differences (P = ≤0.05). Samples above the estimated S/P cutoff (dashed line) were considered positive.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Distribution of cumulative FMIA IgG sample/positive result (S/P) ratios obtained for each recombinant polypeptide (S1 non-S-INDEL, S1 S-INDEL, N, M, or E) on serum samples (n = 792 total; n = 132 per group) collected at DPI −7, 0, 3, 7, 10, 14, 17, 21, 28, 35, and 42 from pigs (n = 72 total; n = 12 per group) inoculated with PEDV (USA/IN/2013/19338E), TGEV Miller (ATCC VR-1740), TGEV Purdue (ATCC VR-763), PRCV (ATCC VR-2384), or PDCoV (USA/IL/2014) or with a negative control (sham inoculation). The FMIA S/P cutoff values estimated for each individual antigen are presented in the graph (dashed line).

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Amino acid sequences of 5 recombinant polypeptides derived from the following PEDV structural proteins: (i) envelope (E) full-length protein (CV777 PEDV strain); (ii) full-length nucleocapsid (N) protein from a consensus among PEDV strains (CV777, non-S-INDEL, and S-INDEL); (iii) truncated (C-terminal intravirion topological domain) membrane (M) protein from a consensus among PEDV strains (CV777, S-INDEL, and non-S-INDEL); (iv) truncated spike protein (globular head; S1) from a consensus among PEDV non-S-INDEL strains; (v) S1 from a consensus among PEDV S-INDEL strains.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1

    Optimal S/P cutoff points and diagnostic sensitivity of serum IgG antibody response to each PEDV antigen by 6-plex FMIA or WV ELISA

    AssayPEDV marker(s)Cutoff (S/P)aNo. of samples that tested positive/total no. (%) of positive samples; 95% CIb
    6-plex FMIAS1 (non-S-INDEL)0.1069/72 (95.8); 88.4–98.6
    S1 (S-INDEL)0.1168/72 (94.4); 86.5–97.8
    N0.5959/72 (81.9); 71.5–89.1
    M0.2158/72 (80.6); 69.9–88.0
    E0.901/72 (1.4); 0.25–7.5
    WV particles0.6748/72 (66.7); 55.2–76.5
    ELISAWV particles0.7063/72 (87.5); 77.9–93.3
    • ↵a The optimal S/P cutoff points were selected to ensure 100% diagnostic specificity.

    • ↵b CI, confidence interval.

  • TABLE 2

    Detection of serum IgG antibody responses among inoculation groups by day postinoculationa

    Inoculation groupTotal no. of pigsPEDV marker(s)AssayNo. of pigs positive by day postinoculation:
    −703710141721283542
    PEDV12S1 (non-S-INDEL)6-plex FMIA000 6 11 11 11 12 12 12 11
    S1 (S-INDEL)000 5 10 11 11 12 12 11 11
    N000 2 6 10 10 10 10 10 9
    M000 1 8 10 10 10 10 9 9
    E000000000 1 0
    WV particles0000 3 7 9 9 8 8 7
    WV particlesSingle ELISA000 2 7 11 10 11 11 10 10
    TGEV Purdue12S1 (non-S-INDEL)6-plex FMIA00000000000
    S1 (S-INDEL)00000000000
    N00000000000
    M000 3 9 9 9 9 8 8 8
    E00000000000
    WV particles000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    WV particlesSingle ELISA000 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
    TGEV Miller12S1 (non-S-INDEL)6-plex FMIA00000000000
    S1 (S-INDEL)00000000000
    N000 2 2 1 00000
    M000 2 10 11 11 12 11 11 11
    E00000000000
    WV particles000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    WV particlesSingle ELISA000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
    PRCV12S1 (non-S-INDEL)6-plex FMIA00000000000
    S1 (S-INDEL)00000000000
    N00000000000
    M000 3 5 6 5 7 7 3 7
    E00000000000
    WV particles0000 1 000000
    WV particlesSingle ELISA00000000000
    PDCoV12S1 (non-S-INDEL)6-plex FMIA00000000000
    S1 (S-INDEL)00000000000
    N00000000000
    M00000 1 00000
    E00000000000
    WV particles00000000000
    WV particlesSingle ELISA00000000000
    • ↵a Data are presented as numbers of samples (with values above selected S/P cutoff values) that tested positive with respect to each PEDV antigen by 6-plex FMIA or WV ELISA. Data in bold indicate true-positive results, and data in italics indicate false-positive results (cross-reactivity).

  • TABLE 3

    Amino acid sequence homology of PEDV recombinant polypeptides S1, N, M, and E compared to homologous regions of PEDV-related porcine coronaviruses TGEV Miller, TGEV Purdue, PRCV, and PDCoV used during experimental inoculationa

    Strain used for exptl inoculation% homology for amino acid sequence of PEDV recombinant polypeptide
    S1 PEDV non-S-INDEL (consensus)S1 PEDV S-INDEL (consensus)N PEDV (consensus)M PEDV (consensus)E PEDV (CV777 strain)
    PEDV non-S-INDEL (USA/IN/2013/19338E)1009210010098
    TGEV Purdue (ATCC VR-763)2828315528
    TGEV Miller (ATCC VR-1740)2828315528
    PRCV (ATCC VR-2384)2929315530
    PDCoV (USA/IL/2014)2323202019
    • ↵a Sequence analysis was performed using UGene multiplatform software (version 1.25; Unipro, Novosibirsk, Russia). S1, spike (globular head); N, nucleocapsid (full length); M, membrane (C-terminal intravirion topological domain); E, envelope (full length).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    • Supplemental file 1 -

      Tables S1 (Porcine coronaviruses strains, inoculum doses, and routes used during experimental inoculations) and S2 (PEDV strains used to determine consensus amino acid sequences corresponding to PEDV recombinant polypeptides)

      PDF, 210K

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Reactivity of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Structural Proteins to Antibodies against Porcine Enteric Coronaviruses: Diagnostic Implications
Luis Gabriel Gimenez-Lirola, Jianqiang Zhang, Jose Antonio Carrillo-Avila, Qi Chen, Ronaldo Magtoto, Korakrit Poonsuk, David H. Baum, Pablo Piñeyro, Jeffrey Zimmerman
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 2017, 55 (5) 1426-1436; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02507-16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reactivity of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Structural Proteins to Antibodies against Porcine Enteric Coronaviruses: Diagnostic Implications
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Reactivity of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Structural Proteins to Antibodies against Porcine Enteric Coronaviruses: Diagnostic Implications
Luis Gabriel Gimenez-Lirola, Jianqiang Zhang, Jose Antonio Carrillo-Avila, Qi Chen, Ronaldo Magtoto, Korakrit Poonsuk, David H. Baum, Pablo Piñeyro, Jeffrey Zimmerman
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 2017, 55 (5) 1426-1436; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02507-16
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antigens, Viral
Coronavirus Infections
Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus
swine
Swine Diseases
transmissible gastroenteritis virus
PEDV
recombinant structural proteins
whole virus
multiplex FMIA
ELISA
antibody response
cross-reactivity

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X