Article Figures & Data
Tables
- TABLE 1
Performance characteristics of the MERS-CoV r-gene rRT-PCR assay in comparison to those of the in-house assaya
MERS-CoV r-gene rRT-PCR assay specimen No. of positive results/total no. of tests (%) PPA (95% CI) NPA (95% CI) OPA (95% CI) MERS-CoV-positive cases MERS-CoV-negative cases Upper respiratory tract OPSs (n = 28)b 9/9 (100) 0/19 (0) 100.0 (70.1–100.0) 100.0 (83.2–100.0) 100.0 (87.9–100.0) NPSs (n = 15)c 5/5 (100) 0/10 (0) 100.0 (56.6–100.0) 100.0 (72.2–100.0) 100.0 (79.6–100.0) Lower respiratory tract Sputa (n = 55)d 24/25 (96.0) 0/30 (0) 96.0 (80.5–99.3) 100.0 (88.6–100.0) 98.2 (90.4–99.7) TTAs (n = 30)e 10/10 (100) 0/20 (0) 100.0 (72.2–100.0) 100.0 (83.9–100.0) 100.0 (88.6–100.0) ETAs (n = 2)f 1/1 (100) 0/1 (0) 100.0 (20.7–100.0) 100.0 (20.7–100.0) 100.0 (34.2–100.0) ↵a MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; rRT-PCR, real-time reverse transcription-PCR; PPA, positive percent agreement; NPA, negative percent agreement; OPA, overall percent agreement; CI, confidence interval; OPSs, oropharyngeal swabs; NPSs, nasopharyngeal swabs; TTAs, transtracheal aspirates; ETAs, endotracheal aspirates.
↵b The median CT (range) was 39.2 (30.4 to 42.5).
↵c The median CT (range) was 29.9 (27.6 to 38.1).
↵d The median CT (range) was 33.5 (20.2 to 41.0).
↵e The median CT (range) was 32.5 (22.3 to 37.5).
↵f The median CT was 35.8.