Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Clinical Veterinary Microbiology

Assessment of Chronic Wasting Disease Prion Shedding in Deer Saliva with Occupancy Modeling

Kristen A. Davenport, Brittany A. Mosher, Brian M. Brost, Davin M. Henderson, Nathaniel D. Denkers, Amy V. Nalls, Erin McNulty, Candace K. Mathiason, Edward A. Hoover
Brad Fenwick, Editor
Kristen A. Davenport
aPrion Research Center, Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brittany A. Mosher
bFish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian M. Brost
cMarine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Davin M. Henderson
aPrion Research Center, Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathaniel D. Denkers
aPrion Research Center, Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy V. Nalls
aPrion Research Center, Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin McNulty
aPrion Research Center, Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Candace K. Mathiason
aPrion Research Center, Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward A. Hoover
aPrion Research Center, Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brad Fenwick
University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01243-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Schematic framework for multiscale occupancy model. We adopted a multiscale occupancy modeling framework, where our top tier (deer level, ψ) represents the CWD infection status of an individual deer, the second tier (sample level, θ) represents individual saliva samples over time, when the deer may or may not be shedding. The third tier (detection, p) indicates RT-QuIC detection in each replicate from an individual saliva sample. Because we have false-positive and false-negative errors, it is possible that a saliva sample with no prions (no shedding, middle sample) can produce positive replicates in RT-QuIC and that a sample that does contain prions (shedding, left sample) can produce negative replicates in RT-QuIC. Deer and syringe images courtesy of the Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (http://ian.umces.edu/symbols/).

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Representative RT-QuIC data for saliva from CWD-infected deer over the course of observation. Each sample was tested in quadruplicates in two experiments (n = 8 replicates total). (A) The numbers of samples with 0%, 0 to ≤25%, 25% to ≤50%, 50 to ≤75%, 75 to <100%, or 100% positive replicates (raw, or naive, results) are indicated by the y axis. (B) The percentages of replicates that were positive for individual samples are indicated by bars. The x axis specifies the months postinoculation; a label on the x axis with no bar indicates that a sample was tested, and no replicates were positive. The observations of imperfect detection (A) and apparent randomness in shedding (B) in the raw data, as depicted here, motivated us to pursue a modeling approach that accounts for detection error.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Sensitivity is imperfect. We compared two methods for the concentration of saliva before testing by RT-QuIC and assessed the effect of sample storage duration (i.e., amount of time stored at −80°C). Because older samples were all tested with IOME and newer samples were all tested with PTA, it is impossible to model the effects of method and storage time separately. However, we can assess their combined effects on sensitivity. The black lines indicate the average probability of detection (or sensitivity) and the gray shaded regions represent the 95% credible intervals. Vertical dotted lines indicate the ranges of sample storage duration for our samples.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Probability of prion shedding in saliva increases with time. (A) The mean probability of prion shedding in saliva for a male GG deer inoculated with saliva via the oral route is indicated by the higher black line, and the light gray shaded region represents the 95% credible interval. The mean probability of prion shedding in saliva for a male GG deer inoculated with blood via the IV route is indicated by the lower black line, and the dark gray shaded region represents the 95% credible interval. The x axis indicates months postinoculation, from the date of the last inoculation or the date the contact deer were initially exposed to prion-infected deer. (B) We compared the probabilities of shedding in tonsil biopsy specimen-positive and tonsil biopsy specimen-negative samples. The values are derived from male GG deer inoculated with saliva via the oral route. Violin plots portray our knowledge of the effect of tonsil biopsy specimen status on prion shedding. The widths of the violins are proportional to the probabilities of a particular value of shedding probability being the true value, and the heights of the violins span the 95% credible intervals for the probability of shedding (i.e., there is a 95% probability that the true values of prion shedding are encompassed by the violins). The dots represents the “posterior” means and are a point estimate for shedding probability in each case.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Probability of shedding is not associated with the genotype at codon 96 or with sex. (A) We compared the probabilities of prion shedding in saliva from deer homozygous for glycine at codon 96 (GG, the more susceptible genotype) and deer heterozygous at codon 96 (GS, the more resistant genotype). The values are derived from male deer inoculated with saliva via the oral route. (B) We compared the probabilities of prion shedding in saliva between male and female deer. The values are derived from GG deer inoculated with saliva via the oral route. Violin plots portray our knowledge of the effect of sex or genotype on prion shedding. The widths of the violins are proportional to the probabilities of a particular value of shedding probability being the true value, and the heights of the violins span the 95% credible intervals for the probability of shedding (i.e., there is a 95% probability that the true values of prion shedding are encompassed by the violins). The dots represents the posterior means and are a point estimate for shedding probability in each case.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Deer inoculated with CWD+ saliva via the oral route were more likely to shed prions in their saliva than those with other inoculum/route combinations. The probabilities of shedding for GG male deer in each source/route group were compared. Violin plots portray our knowledge of the effect of inoculum source/route on prion shedding. The widths of the violins are proportional to the probabilities of a particular value of shedding probability being the true value, and the heights of the violins span the 95% credible intervals for the probability of shedding (i.e., there is a 95% probability that the true values of prion shedding are encompassed by the violins). The dots represents the posterior means and are a point estimate for shedding probability in each case.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1

    Summary of the characteristics of the deer included in the study

    Characteristic or groupaNo. (%) of deer (n = 45)
    96GG35 (78)
    96GS10 (22)
    Male23 (51)
    Female22 (49)
    PTA concn17 (38)
    IOME concn28 (62)
    Blood-IP4 (9)
    Blood-IV13 (29)
    Brain-aerosol6 (13)
    Brain-IC1 (2)
    Brain-PO11 (24)
    Contact4 (9)
    Saliva-PO6 (13)
    • ↵a 96GG, deer homozygous for glycine at codon 96, the most susceptible genotype; PTA, saliva concentration by phosphotungstic acid; IOME, saliva concentration by iron oxide magnetic extraction; IP, intraperitoneal; IV, intravenous; IC, intracerebral; PO, per os (oral).

  • TABLE 2

    Covariates for occupancy model

    CovariateaScale parameterbPredictionReference(s)
    SexθMales will have higher probability of shedding (θ) because males have a higher CWD incidence in the wild. The difference is likely due to behaviors exhibited by male deer, which may or may not be replicated in exptl conditions in castrated deer.33, 34
    Genotype (codon 96)θ96GG deer will have a higher probability of shedding because they are more susceptible to disease and because prion replication occurs earlier than in those with 96GS/96SS.5, 19
    Mos postinoculationθDeer are more likely to shed prions later in the disease course because the prion load in the animal is higher.19
    Tonsil biopsy specimen positiveθTonsil biopsy can be used to monitor disease progression. We predict that a deer with a positive tonsil biopsy specimen would be more likely to shed prions in its saliva because the deer has a broader prion distribution than a tonsil biopsy specimen-negative individual.45
    Inoculum/route of inoculationθDeer inoculated with excreta (saliva, etc.) will have a higher probability of shedding than deer inoculated with brain material. We hypothesize that excreted prions are structurally different from CNS prions and these prions may preferentially be shed.
    Concn techniquepThe assay type will affect the probability of detection (p). Of the two methods of sample concn, we predict that IOME will result in a higher probability of detection.45
    Storage durationpIncreased storage duration will decrease the probability of detection due to sample degradation.
    • ↵a We selected covariates and predicted their effects a priori. We described each covariate, the levels of the model impacted by the covariate, and the direction of the effect.

    • ↵b θ indicates shedding/availability (Fig. 1) and p indicates detection.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    • Supplemental file 1 -

      Appendix SA (Multiscale false-positive occupancy model specification and associated full-conditional distributions)

      PDF, 239K

    • Supplemental file 2 -

      Table S1 (Deer level covariates)

      PDF, 48K

    • Supplemental file 3 -

      Table S2 (Sample level covariates)

      PDF, 76K

    • Supplemental file 4 -

      Text S1 (Source code for implementing the MCMC algorithm used to estimate parameters in the multiscale false-positive occupancy model)

      PDF, 52K

    • Supplemental file 5 -

      Text S2 (R code for occupancy model)

      PDF, 119K

    • Supplemental file 6 -

      Text S3 (R code for simulated data)

      PDF, 107K

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Assessment of Chronic Wasting Disease Prion Shedding in Deer Saliva with Occupancy Modeling
Kristen A. Davenport, Brittany A. Mosher, Brian M. Brost, Davin M. Henderson, Nathaniel D. Denkers, Amy V. Nalls, Erin McNulty, Candace K. Mathiason, Edward A. Hoover
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Dec 2017, 56 (1) e01243-17; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01243-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of Chronic Wasting Disease Prion Shedding in Deer Saliva with Occupancy Modeling
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Assessment of Chronic Wasting Disease Prion Shedding in Deer Saliva with Occupancy Modeling
Kristen A. Davenport, Brittany A. Mosher, Brian M. Brost, Davin M. Henderson, Nathaniel D. Denkers, Amy V. Nalls, Erin McNulty, Candace K. Mathiason, Edward A. Hoover
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Dec 2017, 56 (1) e01243-17; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01243-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

CWD
RT-QuIC
false negative
false positive
occupancy modeling
prion

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X