Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mycobacteriology and Aerobic Actinomycetes

Predominance of Th1 Immune Response in Pleural Effusion of Patients with Tuberculosis among Other Exudative Etiologies

Vinícius da Cunha Lisboa, Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves, Raquel da Silva Corrêa, Isabelle Ramos Lopes, Thiago Thomaz Mafort, Ana Paula Santos, Thaís Porto Amadeu, Rogério Rufino, Luciana Silva Rodrigues
Geoffrey A. Land, Editor
Vinícius da Cunha Lisboa
aLaboratory of Immunopathology, Medical Science Faculty, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves
bLaboratory of Clinical Research on STD/AIDS, National Institute of Infectology Evandro Chagas, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raquel da Silva Corrêa
aLaboratory of Immunopathology, Medical Science Faculty, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabelle Ramos Lopes
aLaboratory of Immunopathology, Medical Science Faculty, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thiago Thomaz Mafort
cDepartment of Pulmonary and Tisiology Care, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital/Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ana Paula Santos
cDepartment of Pulmonary and Tisiology Care, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital/Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thaís Porto Amadeu
aLaboratory of Immunopathology, Medical Science Faculty, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rogério Rufino
cDepartment of Pulmonary and Tisiology Care, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital/Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luciana Silva Rodrigues
aLaboratory of Immunopathology, Medical Science Faculty, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geoffrey A. Land
Carter BloodCare & Baylor University Medical Center
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00927-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Pleural tuberculosis (PlTB), a common form of extrapulmonary TB, remains a challenge in the diagnosis among many causes of pleural effusion. We recently reported that the combinatorial analysis of interferon gamma (IFN-γ), IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10), and adenosine deaminase (ADA) from the pleural microenvironment was useful to distinguish pleural effusion caused by TB (microbiologically confirmed or not) among other etiologies. In this cross-sectional cohort study, a set of inflammatory mediators was quantified in blood and pleural fluid (PF) from exudative pleural effusion cases, including PlTB (n = 27) and non-PlTB (nTB) (n = 25) patients. The levels of interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, IFN-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), IP-10, transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β), and ADA were determined using cytometric bead assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), or biochemical tests. IFN-γ, IP-10, TNF, TGF-β, and ADA quantified in PF showed significantly higher concentrations in PlTB patients than in nTB patients. When blood and PF were compared, significantly higher concentrations of IL-6 and IL-10 in PF were identified in both groups. TGF-β, solely, showed significantly increased levels in PF and blood from PlTB patients when both clinical specimens were compared to those from nTB patients. Principal-component analysis (PCA) revealed a T helper type 1 (Th1) pattern attributed mainly to higher levels of IP-10, IFN-γ, TGF-β, and TNF in the pleural cavity, which was distinct between PlTB and nTB. In conclusion, our findings showed a predominantly cellular immune response in PF from TB cases, rather than other causes of exudative effusion commonly considered in the differential diagnosis of PlTB.

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is currently endemic in the world and represents an important public health problem. Globally, in 2017, more than 10 million new cases of TB were reported, with an estimated 1.3 million deaths. Among infectious diseases, TB is the leading cause of death from a single agent, surpassing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (1). Although TB affects mainly the lungs, extrapulmonary forms can appear as an initial manifestation in approximately 25% of adults with the disease, of which the pleural space is one of the most affected sites (2), although the incidence varies between regions and/or due to HIV infection, as recently reviewed by Shaw et al. (3). In Brazil, a country with a high TB burden, pleural tuberculosis (PlTB) is responsible for more than 40% of cases among many clinical sites of extrapulmonary TB (4), and it still imposes a challenging diagnosis mainly due to its paucibacillary nature and the need for invasive procedures (5).

The cellular immune response involving CD4+ T lymphocytes (T-helper type 1 [Th1]), classically studied and associated with the containment of M. tuberculosis in pulmonary parenchymal TB, is also predominant in tuberculous pleuritis, which is confirmed by the higher levels of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and other inflammatory cytokines (e.g., interleukin-12 [IL-12]) in pleural fluid than in peripheral blood (2, 6–8). IFN-γ promotes cell differentiation and stimulates an increased phagocytic activity and intermediate nitrogen and oxygen species production, which are bactericidal and participate in resistance to M. tuberculosis infection (9, 10). In addition, other T-cell effector patterns are involved in M. tuberculosis control in the pleural microenvironment, such as Th17, which express the retinoic acid-related orphan receptor gamma t (RORγt), and are characterized by secretion of large quantities of IL-17 (also known as IL-17A), IL-21, and IL-22 (10, 11). Th17 cells induce the expression of many proinflammatory factors (cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors), which are ultimately involved in granulopoiesis and recruitment of innate cells, mainly neutrophils, especially in the early stages of infection (12, 13). It is well described that patients in early stages of PlTB (duration of less than 2 weeks) or those who present pleural effusion with high complexity (e.g., loculated pleural effusion or TB empyema) are more likely to have neutrophilic exudates (14), which may contribute to injuries and decrease of pleuro-pulmonary functions.

The phenomenon termed “compartmentalization” has been well documented in PlTB given the marked accumulation of Th lymphocytes in the pleural cavity rather than in peripheral blood (6, 7, 15). It was shown that PlTB patients present an increased frequency of Th17 and polyfunctional effector memory T cells in the pleural cavity in comparison to blood (16, 17). Apart from this effector response, regulatory T cells (Tregs), which act by bringing down the enhanced immune-mediated damage (18), have also been reported in pleural fluid from PlTB patients (16, 19, 20). These observations provide strong pieces of evidence that cytokine-producing T cells are able to migrate into the pleural space, not only favoring accumulation of many products and components of the immune response against M. tuberculosis but also contributing to the paucibacillary nature of the disease and yet reducing tissue damage.

In the present study, we aimed to identify immunological response patterns represented by Th1, Th2, and Th17 T-cell subsets in peripheral blood and pleural fluid among exudative pleural effusion, which could contribute to a better understanding of PlTB immunopathology and also have a high potential for utility in the clinical management of TB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population and settings.Patients aged ≥18 years with pleural effusion under investigation and with an indication for thoracentesis were recruited in this cross-sectional study, which was conducted at the Pulmonology and Tisiology Service, Pedro Ernesto University Hospital/Rio de Janeiro State University (HUPE/UERJ), a tertiary care center in Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Patients who were under 18 years of age, pregnant, or refused consent were not recruited. Of 62 recruited patients, 10 were excluded: 8 patients had transudative pleural effusion (cardiac or renal failure), and 2 patients were HIV seropositive. Thus, 52 patients with exudative pleural effusion were enrolled and grouped as 27 PlTB patients and 25 non-TB patients. PlTB cases were defined by the reviewed patient history, followed by a detailed physical examination and at least one diagnostic criterion: (i) positive results in the microbiological tests (acid-fast bacillus smear microscopy, mycobacterial culture, or Xpert MTB/RIF) of pleural fluid or pleural tissue; (ii) histopathological analysis showing the presence of granuloma with or without caseous necrosis; and (iii) clinical manifestations suggesting TB (fever, pain, dyspnea, cough, night sweats, hyporexia, and/or weight loss) in combination with a lymphocytic pleural effusion, followed by a full recovery after at least 6 months of anti-TB treatment. Non-TB cases consisted of patients with pleural or pleuro-pulmonary diseases, excluding active TB, based on clinical, laboratory, radiological, microbiological, and/or pathological features. Malignant pleural effusions were diagnosed by a positive pleural fluid cytology result or malignant cells identified in the pleural fragment. Even when both of these test results were negative, malignant effusion was diagnosed when a primary cancer was known to have disseminated and no other cause of pleural effusion was identified. Patients who did not fit the criteria used for PlTB diagnosis as described above and with unknown causes of pleural effusion were classified as having “undefined” pleural effusion and considered non-PlTB. Medical information, peripheral blood, and pleural fluid samples were obtained from all recruited subjects after they signed a written consent form. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee (HUPE/UERJ; number 1.100.772).

Sample collection.Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis was performed by a trained pulmonologist who collected pleural fluid which was directly drawn into collection tubes for routine diagnostic tests, including chemistry panel, total and differential cell count, adenosine deaminase (ADA) measurement by Hermes Pardini Laboratory according Giusti’s method (21), cytopathology, microbiological analysis (bacteria, fungi, and mycobacteria), and inflammatory biomarkers for the purpose of the present study. Whole blood and pleural fluid were appropriately collected in tubes without anticoagulant immediately after the thoracentesis procedure and before any treatment. After collection, whole blood and pleural fluid tubes were centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 10 min and 25°C or 4°C, respectively. Serum and pleural fluid (without cells) samples were then aliquoted and stored frozen at –20°C until cytokine quantification.

Cytokine assays.Cytokine levels in clinical samples were assessed using the following commercially available kits. (i) The human Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokine kit (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA), based on the principle of cytometric bead array (CBA) technology, was used for simultaneous detection of seven cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor [TNF], IFN-γ, and IL-17A). Briefly, capture beads labeled with a distinct fluorescence intensity (allophycocyanin [APC]) conjugated to specific antibodies for cytokines were incubated for about 3 h in the dark at room temperature with undiluted samples and fluorescent detection antibody (phycoerythrin [PE]). All unbound antibodies were washed, and data were acquired on a BD FACSCanto II fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analyzer. Cytokine standard curves ranged from 0 to 5,000 pg/ml. (ii) IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) and transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β) levels were measured by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the human IP-10 DuoSet ELISA (R&D Systems Inc, MN, USA) and the human/mouse TGF beta 1 ELISA Ready-SET-Go! kit (second generation) (Affymetrix; eBioscience), respectively, following the manufacturer’s instruction. The ranges of these assays were 31.3 to 20,000 pg/ml for IP-10 and 15.6 to 1,000 pg/ml for TGF-β. Readings higher than the upper limit were set at 20,000 (IP-10) or 1,000 (TGF-β) pg/ml for analytical purposes.

Statistical analysis.For the description of the population included in the study according to their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics among the individuals with exudative pleural effusion due to PlTB or other causes (non-TB), the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous variables or Fisher’s exact test for comparison of the relative frequencies of the different levels of nominal/categorical variables. In the comparison between the levels of log-transformed expression (base 10) of proteins in peripheral blood/serum and pleural fluid (tissue effect) between individuals with or without PlTB (TB effect), the expected mean marginal values obtained from multiple linear regression (log-linear) models of fixed effects were used, with the inclusion of first-order interactions between the main tissue and TB effects. For the adjusted models, graphical analysis of residuals was performed to confirm their randomness. In the comparisons between expected mean marginal values obtained from linear regression models, adjustments of the confidence level were made by Sidak’s method and P value adjustments by multiple comparisons by Tukey’s method. Finally, for log10-transformed protein and ADA expression data, a multivariate principal-component analysis (PCA) was performed to visualize the distribution of sample individuals in two-dimensional (2D) spaces. After imputation of missing data by a k-nearest-neighbor (k = 10) algorithm, we proceeded with a greedy iterative data reduction until finding a conventionally acceptable level of 0.8 for the standardized Cronbach’s coefficient alpha (22) for scale reliability, selecting a subset of “highly predictive” variables. The proportion of variation explained was calculated after each eigenvalue. The cumulative percentage explained is obtained by adding the successive proportions of variation explained to obtain the running total. The contributions (in percentage) of the variables to the principal components were calculated as (var. cos2 × 100)/(total cos2 of the component), where cos2 indicates square cosine or squared coordinates. Accordingly, the contributions (in percentage) of individuals to the principal components were calculated as (ind. cos2 × 100)/(total cos2 of the component). Ellipses of the quantiles 66% of the normal distribution adjusted to the individuals of the different interest groups in these new dimensional spaces are presented. A P value of  ≤0.05 was used as the level of significance in the analysis, and all analyses were performed in R software version 3.6.1.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics.The study population was composed of 52 individuals who were diagnosed as having PlTB (n = 27) or non-TB (n = 25), according to the previously described criteria (8). Their sociodemographic and clinical data are shown in Table 1. We observed a significant difference in the age distributions between the groups, which presented medians corresponding to 63 years (interquartile range [IQR], 18) in the non-TB group and 40 years (IQR, 20.5) in the PlTB group (P < 0.0001). Smoking and alcohol use among participants did not show statistical differences. Likewise, signs and symptoms were not dissimilar among groups. Fourteen patients in the non-TB group (14/25) had one or more associated diseases, showing that this group had a significantly higher number of patients with comorbidities than observed in the PlTB group, which had 6 individuals (6/27) with other diseases (P = 0.0217). The most prevalent comorbidity was hypertension, which was reported in 9 (36%) non-TB patients and 3 (11%) PlTB patients. A significant mononuclear cell count in pleural fluid was observed in the PlTB group in comparison to the non-TB group (P = 0.0148), while polymorphonuclear cells were significantly higher in non-TB patients (P = 0.021). Regarding the biochemical panel, glucose concentration was significantly increased in non-TB patients in comparison to PlTB patients (P = 0.0288). The majority of the PlTB patients had diagnostic confirmation based on microbiological and/or histopathological criteria. Among non-TB patients, 18 presented malignancies (10 adenocarcinomas, 2 lymphomas, and 6 unspecified neoplasms), 2 had autoimmune disease (systemic lupus erythematosus), 1 had bacterial parapneumonic effusion, and 4 had undefined pleural effusion.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the study populationa

Cytokine measurement in blood and pleural fluid from PlTB and non-TB patients.In order to evaluate the pattern of Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokines and other inflammatory mediators such as IP-10, TGF-β, and ADA in exudative cases of pleural effusion, serum and pleural fluid samples from PlTB and non-TB patients were analyzed. As recently reported by our group (8) and others (21–23), IP-10 and IFN-γ levels were significantly increased (P < 0.0001 for both) in pleural fluid in comparison to serum in the PlTB group (Fig. 1A and D). As shown in Fig. 1E, the TNF concentration also showed a significant increase in the pleural fluid compared to serum in PlTB patients (P = 0.0016).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Inflammatory mediators in serum and/or pleural fluid from PlTB and non-TB (nTB) patients. Cytokines were measured in serum and pleural fluid by CBA (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF, IFN-γ, and IL-17A), ELISA (IP-10 and TGF-β), and a biochemical test (ADA). The levels obtained from each inflammatory mediator were analyzed on a logarithmic (base 10) scale and illustrated using box plots to compare serum (S) and pleural fluid (PF) data between the non-TB and PlTB groups. The small gray dots represent individual cases, and the box plots represent the interquartile range and the median of the sample (solid gray central line). Larger black dots and vertical bars represent expected mean marginal values estimated by the linear model and its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Comparisons of means between groups were performed by contrasts/differences obtained after use of linear bi- and multivariate models, adjusted by regressions by ordinary least squares. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

When cytokines were compared with discriminatory objectives between PlTB and non-TB patients, significant differences in the pleural fluid were predominantly observed. IL-6 and IL-10 levels presented the same behavior when serum and pleural fluid were compared in the PlTB or non-TB groups (Fig. 1G and F, respectively). Both IL-10 and IL-6 concentrations show that patients in both the PlTB (P < 0.0001 for both) and non-TB (P < 0.0001 for both) groups had increased concentrations of this cytokine in pleural fluid compared to serum in their respective groups. As expected, ADA levels were significantly higher in the pleural fluid of PlTB patients than in that of non-TB patients (P < 0.0001). Interestingly, TGF-β concentrations were significantly higher in the serum and pleural fluid of PlTB patients than in non-TB patient samples (P < 0.0001). Concentrations of TGF-β showed no significant serum and pleural fluid differences in the same group (Fig. 1B).

Finally, IFN-γ, TNF, IP-10, TGF-β, and ADA concentrations in the pleural fluid showed a differentiated profile between PlTB and non-TB patients. Cytokines IL-17A, IL-4, and IL-2 did not show significant differences in their concentrations.

PCA of pleural fluid cytokines.Finally, we examined whether PlTB was associated with a particular inflammatory pattern against other causes of exudative pleural effusion. Since that our most significative results were observed in the pleural microenvironment, all subsequent analyses were performed in pleural fluid. A principal-component analysis (PCA) plot illustrated that 66.7% of the total variance in response to 8 biomarkers was expressed by 2 principal components. The first component accounted for a total of 47.8%, while the second accounted for 18.9% of the total variance (Table 2; Fig. 2A). Altogether, these 8 biomarkers were able to partially discriminate PlTB and non-TB cases. The most determinant variables of each of these two principal components were ADA, IP-10, TGF-β, IFN-γ, and TNF for the first principal component (Dim1) and IL-2 and IL-4 for the second principal component (Dim2) (Table 3). Curiously, 2 clusters were identified among the main inflammatory mediators with discriminative potential between PlTB and non-TB (Fig. 2B). IP-10, IFN-γ, TGF-β, and TNF were considered the main contributors for the observed variance and were able to show a clear separation between PlTB and non-TB groups (Fig. 2C). Additionally, the individual mean variation of the study population was analyzed, showing that among the top 10 cases with the highest contributions were identified PlTB patients who had diagnostic confirmation based on microbiological and/or histopathological criteria (3/5), while non-TB patients consisted of confirmed cases of malignant effusion (5/5) (Fig. 2D).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 2

Principal-component analysis of inflammatory biomarkers in pleural effusion from patients with PlTB and other daignosesa

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

The pattern of inflammatory biomarkers in pleural fluid discriminates between PlTB and non-TB patients. Analyses of variance of cytokine concentrations by CBA (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF, IFN-γ, and IL-17A), ELISA (TGF-β and IP-10), and a biochemical test (ADA) were evaluated for PlTB (n = 27) and non-TB (n = 25) patients. All but IL-6 and IL-17A, with reliability (standardized Cronbach coefficient alpha) of 0.81, were included in a principal-component analysis (PCA). (A) A 2D representation, given by the two first principal components with 47.78% and 18.9% variation explained (66.68% cumulative percentage explained), of PlTB (yellow dots) and non-TB (blue dots), with dot sizes proportional to the individual mean contribution to either principal component. Variables (biomarkers) are expressed by colored vectors also indicating their mean contribution to the principal components. (B) A representation where the vector represents the correlation between a variable (biomarker) and a principal component (PC) is used as the coordinates of the variable on the PC. Variables are colored according to the results of a divisive k-means (k = 2) clustering. (C) Bar graph indicating the top five variables (biomarkers) according to their mean contribution to either principal component. (D) Bar graph indicating the top 10 individuals (patients) according to their mean contribution to either principal component.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 3

Contributions of the biomarkers in pleural effusion from patients with PlTB and other diagnoses to components 1 and 2 in the principal-component analysisa

DISCUSSION

Among many known causes of pleural effusion, heart failure, malignant conditions, pneumonia, and PlTB are responsible for three-quarters of all cases (23). The present work extends previous data from our group, which proposed a model where IFN-γ and ADA can be used in the differential diagnosis of PlTB with high performance in microbiologically unconfirmed cases of PlTB (8). Here we demonstrate that among Th1/Th2/Th17 and other inflammatory mediators, such as IP-10, TGF-β and ADA, there is a predominant inflammatory pattern associated with the cellular (Th1) immune response in PlTB patients in comparison to those with other common exudative causes of pleural effusion, which, to our knowledge, has not been previously described. PCA revealed that IP-10, IFN-γ, TGF-β, and TNF showed the largest variations associated with a clear distinction between PlTB and non-TB patients.

In clinical practice, values in pleural effusion of >40 IU/liter of adenosine deaminase (ADA), a purine-degrading enzyme found predominantly in T lymphocytes, associated with a lymphocytic exudate and clinical suspicion of TB, indicate that the most likely diagnosis is tuberculosis (24–26). However, high pleural fluid ADA values can also be found in certain other conditions, such as adenocarcinoma, lymphoma, mesothelioma, rheumatoid arthritis, and pleural empyema of bacterial etiology, making the differential diagnosis very difficult (27, 28), once the gold standard for the diagnosis of PlTB, that is, the detection of M. tuberculosis in the sputum, pleural fluid, or pleural biopsy specimen, has a discrete and variable yield (29, 30).

Currently, measurement of IFN-γ (a classical Th1 response) in pleural effusion has raised its importance as an auxiliary method for the diagnosis of PlTB, becoming an example of a test used for this purpose, since this cytokine is at high levels during the active phase of the disease (31, 32). Therefore, the IFN-γ release assay (IGRA) has also been highlighted in this context. This test evaluates the activity of T lymphocytes under the stimulation of M. tuberculosis ESAT-6 and CFP-10 antigens. However, as reviewed by Aggarwal and collaborators, there are many conflicting results regarding this diagnostic method of active TB, in both pulmonary and pleural forms (33). Moreover, as recently delineated by our group, IGRA has a poor clinical performance in PlTB (8), perhaps due to its paucibacillary nature or due to the enrichment of inflammatory mediators in the pleural space, without needing an additional antigen stimulus. TNF is another important mediator in the response against M. tuberculosis, and it is directly related to the maintenance of the granuloma structure, the colonization bacillus, and the necrosis area (34). Li and collaborators found a higher diagnostic value in TNF measurements than in ADA (35). IP-10 is well studied as a possible biomarker in TB and is directly associated with IFN-γ since its production is induced mainly by this cytokine. As updated by Porcel (36), IP-10 is not an essential biomarker for the PlTB diagnosis, but it has been the subject of several studies in this context, based on its participation in the immunopathogenesis of the disease and its correlation with IFN-γ (8, 37). In the present study, these three biomarkers (IFN-γ, TNF, and IP-10) were found at significantly higher levels in pleural fluid from PlTB patients and were identified as the main contributors to the variance observed in PCA.

The cytokine pattern related to the Th2 effector phenotype was also evaluated. With the methodology employed, we did not detect significant levels of IL-4. This finding confirms the literature data that show little influence of this effector phenotype in TB cases (2, 36), although IL-4 concentrations in miliary TB have already been reported (6). In addition, our study has shown higher concentrations of IL-10 in the pleural fluid of patients with PlTB than in serum, and the same was found for the non-TB group. However, the methodology used in this study was not able to identify which cells present in the pleural fluid were responsible for the increase of IL-10 concentrations, as well as the other cytokines. Geffner et al. showed an increased IL-10 production after stimulation of mononuclear cells in pleural fluid and peripheral blood with M. tuberculosis antigens and the decrease of this cytokine after removal of Tregs, providing evidence that Tregs are also responsible for the production of IL-10 from the pleural cavity (20).

Another important finding in our study was the quantification of TGF-β in serum and pleural fluid. This growth factor, secreted by monocytes, is a chemotactic agent for fibroblasts and plays an important role in extracellular matrix remodeling (38). One of the possible contributions of TGF-β to the pathophysiology of PlTB is its ability to induce fibrosis, as shown in a study by Sasse and collaborators, where animals infected with M. tuberculosis showed increased pleural thickening in proportion to the increase in TGF-β (39). Seiscento and collaborators also found elevated TGF-β levels in serum and pleural fluid of PlTB patients, which was associated with the degree of pleural thickening in these patients (40). Our findings, together with the evidence found in the literature, reinforce the hypothesis that this mediator may be related to the development of pleural effusions in PlTB patients, since TGF-β levels were found to be significantly higher in the pleural fluid of these patients than in that of non-TB patients. Although the cited studies found a significant increase of TGF-β in pleural fluid and serum, the comparison group in the experimental model of these studies was composed of patients with transudative pleural effusion. Our work was able to detect the increase of TGF-β in the serum and pleural fluid of PlTB patients compared to blood and pleural fluid in patients with other causes of exudative effusion. This finding may contribute to future investigations, indicating TGF-β as a possible biomarker to aid in the differential diagnosis of PlTB.

Malignancy is the most prevalent etiology of exudative pleural effusion, preceded by TB (23, 41). In our study, the non-TB group was composed of around 70% (18/25) malignancies among exudative cases excluding TB, which in part could be explained by the characteristics of the recruitment unit (a tertiary care hospital). Atef et al. have shown that although the TNF levels are significantly high in pleural fluid from exudative cases in comparison to transudative ones, there was a significant increase of TNF levels in pleural fluid from PlTB patients versus those with malignant effusion (42). Our work is in accordance with these data, since we did not find significant variations of TNF levels in the blood and pleural fluid from non-TB patients. In another report, a prevalence of the Th17 response in the pleural liquid from patients with lung cancer in comparison to those with TB was shown. IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-10, and IL17A production by CD4+ T cells stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin showed significant differences in the lung cancer group compared to the PlTB group (43). However, transcriptional analysis of cytokine genes highlighted an increased expression of the Th17 pattern in PlTB patients versus those with common causes of exudative pleural effusion, including malignancies and parapneumonic effusion (44). Our results show high concentrations of IL-6 and TGF-β in the pleural compartment of PlTB patients compared to serum. These two biomarkers are critical in the differentiation of Th17 cells (45). Therefore, although our study did not focus on the characterization of Th17 cells, it is quite probable that the microenvironment, through the high concentrations of IL-6 and TGF-β and the low concentrations of IL-2, might favor the differentiation of this T-lymphocyte effector phenotype in PlTB.

Some limitations in our study should be considered. First, it was conducted in a single center, imposing the need for validation in other reference centers and in different populations. Another consideration is the relatively low number of patients included per group. However, patients were included prospectively, in a real routine of clinical practice in a tertiary reference center, which is reflected in the variable clinical characteristics inherent to each group in the study (Table 1). Moreover, we have excluded transudative cases, which could add some bias in our analysis, and we have analyzed only exudative cases of pleural effusion, the main confounders in the differential diagnosis of TB.

In summary, the pleural fluid screening for a panel of inflammatory mediators was useful to provide new hypotheses and better comprehension about the microenvironment of the pleural cavity during the immunopathology of M. tuberculosis infection. Based on this approach we could identify a predominance of cellular (Th1) immune-related response-pointing biomarkers with high potential for clinical use, which may increase the sensitivity of diagnosis and prompt TB treatment, especially in cases of difficult identification and distinction by conventional diagnostic methods.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the physicians of the Tuberculosis Outpatient Clinics of HUPE/UERJ, who contributed to the medical care of the patients included in the study, and we thank Cristiana Macedo for the revision of the manuscript.

Author contributions are as follows: conceptualization, Luciana Silva Rodrigues; data curation, Vinicius da Cunha Lisboa, Raquel da Silva Corrêa, and Isabelle Ramos Lopes; formal analysis, Vinicius da Cunha Lisboa, Raquel da Silva Corrêa, and Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves; funding acquisition, Rogério Lopes Rufino Alves and Luciana Silva Rodrigues; investigation, Vinicius da Cunha Lisboa, Thiago Thomaz Mafort, Ana Paula Gomes dos Santos, Rogério Lopes Rufino Alves, and Luciana Silva Rodrigues; methodology, Vinicius da Cunha Lisboa, Raquel da Silva Corrêa, Isabelle Ramos Lopes, and Thaís Porto Amadeu; project administration, Luciana Silva Rodrigues; resources, Rogério Lopes Rufino Alves, and Luciana Silva Rodrigues; software, Vinicius da Cunha Lisboa and Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves; supervision, Luciana Silva Rodrigues; validation, Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves; writing the original draft, Vinicius da Cunha Lisboa, Raquel da Silva Corrêa, Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves, and Luciana Silva Rodrigues; review and editing, Vinicius da Cunha Lisboa, Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves, and Luciana Silva Rodrigues.

We confirm that all relevant data are included in the article.

This work was supported by the Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (grant no. 261101792014) (http://www.faperj.br/).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We declare that no competing interests exist.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 8 June 2019.
    • Returned for modification 16 July 2019.
    • Accepted 6 October 2019.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 16 October 2019.
  • Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    World Health Organization. 2019 Global tuberculosis report 2018. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Vorster MJ,
    2. Allwood BW,
    3. Diacon AH,
    4. Koegelenberg C
    . 2015. Tuberculous pleural effusions: advances and controversies. J Thoracic Dis 7:981–991. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.02.18.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Shaw JA,
    2. Diacon AH,
    3. Koegelenberg C
    . 2019. Tuberculous pleural effusion. Respirology 24:962–971. doi:10.1111/resp.13673.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Gomes T,
    2. Reis-Santos B,
    3. Bertolde A,
    4. Johnson JL,
    5. Riley LW,
    6. Maciel EL
    . 2014. Epidemiology of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in Brazil: a hierarchical model. BMC Infect Dis 14:9. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Seibert AF,
    2. Haynes J,
    3. Middleton R,
    4. Bass JB
    . 1991. Tuberculous pleural effusion; twenty-year experience. Chest 99:883–886. doi:10.1378/chest.99.4.883.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sharma SK,
    2. Mitra DK,
    3. Balamurugan A,
    4. Pandey RM,
    5. Mehra NK
    . 2002. Cytokine polarization in miliary and pleural tuberculosis. J Clin Immunol 22:345–352. doi:10.1023/a:1020604331886.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mitra DK,
    2. Sharma SK,
    3. Dinda AK,
    4. Bindra MS,
    5. Madan B,
    6. Ghosh B
    . 2005. Polarized helper T cells in tubercular pleural effusion: phenotypic identity and selective recruitment. Eur J Immunol 35:2367–2375. doi:10.1002/eji.200525977.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Santos AP,
    2. da Silva Corrêa R,
    3. Ribeiro-Alves M,
    4. da Silva A,
    5. Mafort TT,
    6. Leung J,
    7. Pereira GMB,
    8. Rodrigues LS,
    9. Rufino R
    . 2018. Application of Venn’s diagram in the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis using IFN-γ, IP-10 and adenosine deaminase. PLoS One 13:e0202481-19. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202481.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Luckheeram RV,
    2. Zhou R,
    3. Verma AD,
    4. Xia B
    . 2012. CD4+ T cells: differentiation and functions. Clin Dev Immunol 2012:925135. doi:10.1155/2012/925135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lyadova IV,
    2. Panteleev AV
    . 2015. Th1 and Th17 Cells in tuberculosis: protection, pathology, and biomarkers. Mediat Inflamm 2015:854507. doi:10.1155/2015/854507.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Wang T,
    2. Lv M,
    3. Qian Q,
    4. Nie Y,
    5. Yu L,
    6. Hou Y
    . 2011. Increased frequencies of T helper type 17 cells in tuberculous pleural effusion. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 91:231–237. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2011.02.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Burkett PR,
    2. Meyer zu Horste G,
    3. Kuchroo V
    . 2015. Pouring fuel on the fire: Th17 cells, the environment, and autoimmunity environment, and autoimmunity. J Clin Invest 125:2211–2219. doi:10.1172/JCI78085.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Korn T,
    2. Bettelli E,
    3. Oukka M,
    4. Kuchroo VK
    . 2009. IL-17 and Th17 Cells. Annu Rev Immunol 27:485–517. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132710.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Shaw JA,
    2. Irusen EM,
    3. Diacon AH,
    4. Koegelenberg CF
    . 2018. Pleural tuberculosis: a concise clinical review. Clin Respir J 12:1779–1786. doi:10.1111/crj.12900.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Rossi GA,
    2. Balbi B,
    3. Manca F
    . 1987. Tuberculous pleural effusions. Evidence for selective presence of PPD-specific T-lymphocytes at site of inflammation in the early phase of the infection. Am Rev Respir Dis 136:575–579. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/136.3.575.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ye ZJ,
    2. Ye ZJ,
    3. Zhou Q,
    4. Zhang JC,
    5. Li X,
    6. Wu C,
    7. Qin SM,
    8. Xin JB,
    9. Shi HZ
    . 2011. CD39+ regulatory T cells suppress generation and differentiation of Th17 cells in human malignant pleural effusion via a LAP-dependent mechanism. Respir Res 12:77. doi:10.1186/1465-9921-12-77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. El Fenniri L,
    2. Toossi Z,
    3. Aung H,
    4. El Iraki G,
    5. Bourkkadi J,
    6. Benamor J,
    7. Laskri A,
    8. Berrada N,
    9. Benjouad A,
    10. Mayanja-Kizza H,
    11. Betts MR,
    12. El Aouad R,
    13. Canaday DH
    . 2011. Polyfunctional M. tuberculosis-specific effector memory CD4+ T cells at sites of pleural TB. Tuberculosis 91:224–230. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2010.12.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hori S,
    2. Nomura T,
    3. Sakaguchi S
    . 2017. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. J Immunol 198:981–985.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Arram EO,
    2. Hassan R,
    3. Saleh M
    . 2014. Increased frequency of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ circulating regulatory T cells (Treg) in tuberculous patients. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc 63:167–172. doi:10.1016/j.ejcdt.2013.10.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Geffner L,
    2. Basile JI,
    3. Yokobori N,
    4. Sabio Y García C,
    5. Musella R,
    6. Castagnino J,
    7. Sasiain MC,
    8. de la Barrera S
    . 2014. CD4+CD25high forkhead box protein 3+ regulatory T lymphocytes suppress interferon-γ and CD107 expression in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from tuberculous pleural effusions. Clin Exp Immunol 175:235–245. doi:10.1111/cei.12227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Giusti G
    . 1974. Methods of enzymatic analysis, 2nd ed. Elsevier, New York, NY.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Revelle W,
    2. Zinbarg R
    . 2009. Coefficientes alpha, beta, omega and the GLB. Psychometrika 74:145–154. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Porcel JM,
    2. Esquerda A,
    3. Vives M,
    4. Bielsa S
    . 2014. Etiología del derrame pleural: análisis de más de 3.000 toracocentesis consecutivas. Arch Bronconeumol 50:161–165. doi:10.1016/j.arbres.2013.11.007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Lee SJ,
    2. Kim HS,
    3. Lee SH,
    4. Lee TW,
    5. Lee HR,
    6. Cho YJ,
    7. Jeong YY,
    8. Kim HC,
    9. Lee JD,
    10. Hwang YS
    . 2014. Factors influencing pleural adenosine deaminase level in patients with tuberculous pleurisy. Am J Med Sci 348:362–365. doi:10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000260.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Jiménez Castro D,
    2. Díaz Nuevo G,
    3. Pérez-Rodríguez E,
    4. Light RW
    . 2003. Diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase in nontuberculous lymphocytic pleural effusions. Eur Respir J 21:220–224. doi:10.1183/09031936.03.00051603.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ruan SY,
    2. Chuang YC,
    3. Wang JY,
    4. Lin JW,
    5. Chien JY,
    6. Huang CT,
    7. Kuo YW,
    8. Lee LN,
    9. Yu CJ
    . 2012. Revisiting tuberculous pleurisy: pleural fluid characteristics and diagnostic yield of mycobacterial culture in an endemic area. Thorax 67:822–827. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201363.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Greco S,
    2. Girardi E,
    3. Masciangelo R,
    4. Capoccetta GB,
    5. Saltini C
    . 2003. Adenosine deaminase and interferon gamma measurements for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy: a meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 7:777–786.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Valdés L,
    2. San José E,
    3. Alvarez D,
    4. Valle JM
    . 1996. Adenosine deaminase (ADA) isoenzyme analysis in pleural effusions: diagnostic role, and relevance to the origin of increased ADA in tuberculous pleurisy. Eur Respir J 9:747–751. doi:10.1183/09031936.96.09040747.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  29. 29.↵
    1. Diacon AH,
    2. Van de Wal BW,
    3. Wyser C,
    4. Smedema JP,
    5. Bezuidenhout J,
    6. Bolliger CT,
    7. Walzl G
    . 2003. Diagnostic tools in tuberculous pleurisy: a direct comparative study. Eur Respir J 22:589–591. doi:10.1183/09031936.03.00017103a.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Gopi A,
    2. Madhavan SM,
    3. Sharma SK,
    4. Sahn AS
    . 2007. Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculous pleural effusion in 2006. Chest 131:880–889. doi:10.1378/chest.06-2063.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Porcel JM
    . 2016. Advances in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis. Ann Transl Med 4:282–210. doi:10.21037/atm.2016.07.23.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Arrigucci R,
    2. Lakehal K,
    3. Vir P,
    4. Handler D,
    5. Davidow AL,
    6. Herrera R,
    7. Estrada-Guzmán JD,
    8. Bushkin Y,
    9. Tyagi S,
    10. Lardizabal AA,
    11. Gennaro ML
    . 2018. Active tuberculosis is characterized by highly differentiated effector memory Th1 cells. Front Immunol 9:2127–2129. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.02127.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Aggarwal AN,
    2. Agarwal R,
    3. Gupta D,
    4. Dhooria S,
    5. Behera D
    . 2016. Interferon gamma release assays for diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol 54:508–508. doi:10.1128/JCM.03178-15.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. O’Garra A,
    2. Redford PS,
    3. McNab FW,
    4. Bloom CI,
    5. Wilkinson RJ,
    6. Berry MPR
    . 2013. The immune response in tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol 31:475–527. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095939.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Li M,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Huang J,
    5. Wang J,
    6. Xi X
    . 2014. Diagnostic accuracy of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-gamma, interlukine-10 and adenosine deaminase 2 in differential diagnosis between tuberculous pleural effusion and malignant pleural effusion. J Cardiothoracic Surg 9:118–116. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-9-118.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Porcel JM
    . 2018. Biomarkers in the diagnosis of pleural diseases: a 2018 update. Ther Adv Respir Dis 12:1753466618808660–1753466618808611. doi:10.1177/1753466618808660.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    1. Ruhwald M,
    2. Aabye MG,
    3. Ravn P
    . 2012. IP-10 release assays in the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection: current status and future directions. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 12:175–187. doi:10.1586/erm.11.97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Toossi Z,
    2. Ellner JJ
    . 1998. The role of TGFβ in the pathogenesis of human tuberculosis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 87:107–114. doi:10.1006/clin.1998.4528.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Sasse SA,
    2. Jadus MR,
    3. Kukes GD
    . 2003. Pleural fluid transforming growth factor-β1 correlates with pleural fibrosis in experimental empyema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:700–705. doi:10.1164/rccm.2202043.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Seiscento M,
    2. Vargas FS,
    3. Antonangelo L,
    4. Acencio MM,
    5. Bombarda S,
    6. Capelozzi VL,
    7. Teixeira LR
    . 2007. Transforming growth factor β-1 as a predictor of fibrosis in tuberculous pleurisy. Respirology 12:660–663. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01135.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Kalaajieh WK
    . 2001. Etiology of exudative pleural effusions in adults in North Lebanon. Can Respir J 8:93–97. doi:10.1155/2001/652418.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Atef HM,
    2. Okab AA,
    3. Al Mehy GF,
    4. El Beheisy MM
    . 2016. The role of tumor necrosis factor alpha in differentiation between malignant and non malignant pleural effusion. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc 65(3):605–612. doi:10.1016/j.ejcdt.2016.02.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Prado-Garcia H,
    2. Romero-Garcia S,
    3. Rumbo-Nava U,
    4. Lopez-Gonzalez JS
    . 2015. Predominance of Th17 over regulatory T-cells in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer implicates a proinflammatory profile. Anticancer Res 35:152936.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    1. Espósito DLA,
    2. Bollela VR,
    3. Feitosa ALP,
    4. da Fonseca BAL
    . 2015. Expression profiles of cytokine mRNAs in the pleural fluid reveal differences among tuberculosis, malignancies, and pneumonia-exudative pleural effusions. Lung 193:1001–1007. doi:10.1007/s00408-015-9809-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    1. Bhaumik S,
    2. Basu R
    . 2017. Cellular and molecular dynamics of Th17 differentiation and its developmental plasticity in the intestinal immune response. Front Immunol 8:254–220. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00254.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Predominance of Th1 Immune Response in Pleural Effusion of Patients with Tuberculosis among Other Exudative Etiologies
Vinícius da Cunha Lisboa, Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves, Raquel da Silva Corrêa, Isabelle Ramos Lopes, Thiago Thomaz Mafort, Ana Paula Santos, Thaís Porto Amadeu, Rogério Rufino, Luciana Silva Rodrigues
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Dec 2019, 58 (1) e00927-19; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00927-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predominance of Th1 Immune Response in Pleural Effusion of Patients with Tuberculosis among Other Exudative Etiologies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Predominance of Th1 Immune Response in Pleural Effusion of Patients with Tuberculosis among Other Exudative Etiologies
Vinícius da Cunha Lisboa, Marcelo Ribeiro-Alves, Raquel da Silva Corrêa, Isabelle Ramos Lopes, Thiago Thomaz Mafort, Ana Paula Santos, Thaís Porto Amadeu, Rogério Rufino, Luciana Silva Rodrigues
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Dec 2019, 58 (1) e00927-19; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00927-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

pleural tuberculosis
pleural effusion
adenosine deaminase
Th1 response
cytokines in pleural effusion
IP-10
transforming growth factor-beta

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X