Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Evaluation of the Revogene Carba C Assay for Detection and Differentiation of Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria

Delphine Girlich, Marine Laguide, Laurent Dortet, Thierry Naas
Daniel J. Diekema, Editor
Delphine Girlich
aEA7361 “Structure, dynamic, function and expression of broad spectrum β-lactamases,” Université Paris-Saclay, LabEx Lermit, Faculty of Medicine, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
bEvolution and Ecology of Resistance to Antibiotics Unit, Institut Pasteur-APHP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marine Laguide
aEA7361 “Structure, dynamic, function and expression of broad spectrum β-lactamases,” Université Paris-Saclay, LabEx Lermit, Faculty of Medicine, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
bEvolution and Ecology of Resistance to Antibiotics Unit, Institut Pasteur-APHP, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurent Dortet
aEA7361 “Structure, dynamic, function and expression of broad spectrum β-lactamases,” Université Paris-Saclay, LabEx Lermit, Faculty of Medicine, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
bEvolution and Ecology of Resistance to Antibiotics Unit, Institut Pasteur-APHP, Paris, France
cBacteriology-Hygiene Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
dAssociated French National Reference Center for Antibiotic Resistance: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laurent Dortet
Thierry Naas
aEA7361 “Structure, dynamic, function and expression of broad spectrum β-lactamases,” Université Paris-Saclay, LabEx Lermit, Faculty of Medicine, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
bEvolution and Ecology of Resistance to Antibiotics Unit, Institut Pasteur-APHP, Paris, France
cBacteriology-Hygiene Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
dAssociated French National Reference Center for Antibiotic Resistance: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thierry Naas
Daniel J. Diekema
University of Iowa College of Medicine
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01927-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The Revogene Carba C assay (formerly GenePOC Carba assay) is a multiplex nucleic acid-based in vitro diagnostic test intended for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) from cultured colonies. This assay was evaluated directly on colonies of 118 well-characterized Enterobacterales with reduced susceptibility to carbapenems and on 49 multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 40 MDR Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. The Revogene Carba C assay’s performance was high, as it was able to detect the five major carbapenemases (NDM, VIM, IMP, KPC, and OXA-48). In Enterobacterales, sensitivity and specificity were 100%. When extrapolating the results to the French CPE epidemiology between 2012 and 2018, this assay would have detected 99.28% of the 9,624 CPE isolates sent to the French NRC, missing 69 CPE isolates (2 GES-5, 10 OXA-23, 2 TMB-1, 1 SME-4, 53 IMI, and 1 FRI). The overall sensitivity and specificity for CP P. aeruginosa were 93.7 and 100%, respectively, as two rare IMP variants (IMP-31 and -46) were not detected. Extrapolating these results to the French epidemiology of CP P. aeruginosa in 2017, 93.3% would have been identified, missing only 1 DIM and 10 GES variants. The Revogene Carba C assay accurately identified the targeted carbapenemase genes in A. baumannii, but when extrapolating these results to the French CP A. baumannii epidemiology of 2017, only 12.50% of them could be detected, as OXA-23 is the most prevalent carbapenemase in CP A. baumannii. The Revogene Carba C assay showed excellent sensitivity and specificity for the five most common carbapenemases regardless of the bacterial host. It is well adapted to the CPE and CP P. aeruginosa epidemiology of many countries worldwide, which makes it suitable for use in the routine microbiology laboratory, with a time to result of ca. 85 min for eight isolates simultaneously.

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenemase-producing (CP) Gram-negative bacteria (CP-GNB) (Enterobacterales [CPE], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [CP-Pa], and Acinetobacter baumannii [CP-Ab]) have increasingly been reported worldwide (1, 2). Carbapenem resistance may be the result of combined mechanisms of both outer membrane permeability defects (e.g., porin defects) and noncarbapenemase β-lactamase (e.g., acquired or overexpressed chromosome-encoded cephalosporinase and/or extended-spectrum β-lactamase) and carbapenemase production (1). The most clinically relevant carbapenemases belong to either Ambler class A or B (metallo-β-lactamases [MBLs]) or Ambler class D (carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamases [CHDLs] or oxacillinases) (3). The Ambler class A carbapenemases include the worldwide-disseminated Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-type enzymes and, to a lesser extent, GES, SME, IMI, NMC-A, and FRI-1 variants (4). MBLs are divided into 3 main groups, the IMP, VIM, and NDM types (3, 5). CHDLs mostly belong to (i) the OXA-48 group in Enterobacterales (including a growing number of variants) (1), (ii) OXA-23, OXA-24/-40, OXA-58, OXA-143, and the overexpressed intrinsic OXA-51-like enzymes in A. baumannii, and (iii) OXA-198 in P. aeruginosa (6–9).

As CP organisms (CPOs) are a major health issue, rapid confirmation of carbapenemase production is essential not only for effective therapy but also for the prompt implementation of infection control measures able to prevent their dissemination (10). Screening protocols are based mainly on cultures of rectal swab specimens on selective media (11, 12), followed by phenotypic tests to confirm a carbapenem-hydrolyzing activity, such as the Carba NP test (13), the rapid carbapenem inactivation method (rCIM) (14), lateral flow immunoassays (15, 16), imipenem hydrolysis detected by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) (17), the BYG test (18), and the β-Carba test (19) or disk diffusion synergy test (DDST) for detection of MBLs and KPCs (e.g., meropenem disks alone and meropenem disks supplemented with aminophenylboronic acid, dipicolinic acid, or cloxacillin) (20). High-level temocillin resistance is a useful phenotypic trait for OXA-48 detection (21). Culture of rectal swab specimens followed by confirmation testing is a long process and often is not compatible with rapid implementation of reinforced hygiene measures (22).

Molecularly based techniques such as PCR and whole-genome sequencing remain the gold standard for the precise identification of carbapenemase genes (22, 23). Molecular methods are now available for detecting carbapenemase genes from bacterial cultures but also directly from clinical specimens in less than an hour (22). Several assays are commercially available. Some require DNA extraction from rectal swab specimens prior to amplification, such as the PCR-based Amplidiag CARBA+MCR assay (Mobidiag, Paris, France) (24), the Amplidiag CARBA+VRE assay (Mobidiag, Paris, France) (25), or the Check-Direct CPE assay (Check-Points, Wageningen, The Netherlands) (26), while others do not require DNA extraction, such as the Eazyyplex SuperBug CRE (Amplex Biosystems GmbH, Gießen, Germany) (27). Others are fully automated, such as CRE ELITe MGB kits on the InGenius platform (Elitech, Les Ulis, France) (28), the BD MAX Checkpoint CPO assay (29), and the GeneXpert Carba-R assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) (30, 31). Most of these assays target the “big 5” carbapenemases, i.e., KPC, OXA-48-like, NDM, VIM, and IMP, which represent more than 99% of the carbapenemases produced by Enterobacterales in countries such as France (32). Very recently, the biological performance of the Revogene Carba C assay (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA) (formerly GenePOC Carba assay [GenePOC, Québec, Canada]) has been compared to that of the Xpert Carba-R assay for the detection of the blaKPC, blaNDM, blaVIM, blaOXA-48-like, and blaIMP genes from pure colonies of Enterobacterales (33). The four most common carbapenemases (NDM, KPC, OXA-48-like, and VIM) were detected with 100% sensitivity by both tests, but for IMPs, the Revogene Carba C assay showed 100% sensitivity, while that of the Xpert Carba-R assay was only 44.4% (33).

In the present study, we have evaluated the performance of the Revogene Carba C assay for the qualitative detection of the most widespread carbapenemase genes (blaKPC, blaNDM, blaVIM, blaIMP, and blaOXA-48) on bacterial colonies of CPE but also on nonfermenting CPOs (P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolates.Bacterial isolates were from the Bicêtre strain collection and correspond to resistance mechanisms identified in France during the last 10 years. Among the 118 cultured colonies of Enterobacterales tested, 92 produced carbapenemases targeted by the assay (KPC [n = 17], VIM [n = 9], IMP [n = 10], NDM [n = 13], OXA-48 [n = 30], and multiple carbapenemases [n = 13]), 13 were carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales but not CPE, 13 were nontargeted CPE, and two produced OXA-48-like carbapenemases (OXA-405 and OXA-163) that lack carbapenem-hydrolytic activity and therefore are not carbapenemases (34, 35) (Table 1). Among the 49 cultured colonies of Pseudomonas sp., 31 produced targeted carbapenemases (4 KPC, 8 VIM, 17 IMP, and 2 NDM), 11 were carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas sp. but not CP-Pa, and 7 were nontargeted CP-Pa (Table 2). Among the 40 cultured colonies of Acinetobacter sp., 17 produced targeted carbapenemases (1 VIM, 4 IMP, and 12 NDM), 10 were non-carbapenemase producers, and 13 were nontargeted CP-Ab (Table 3). Bacteria were plated on either MH or CarbaSmart agar (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) or on URI4 (Bio-Rad, Marne la Coquette, France).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Global performances of the Revogene Carba C assay on colonies of Enterobacterales grown on MH agar (n = 118)

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 2

Global performance of the Revogene Carba C assay on Pseudomonas sp. strains (n = 49)

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 3

Global performances of the Revogene Carba C assay on Acinetobacter sp. strains (n = 40)

Revogene Carba C assay.The Revogene Carba C assay was used as recommended by the manufacturer on fresh overnight bacterial colonies. Bacteria to be tested were resuspended in physiological water until a 0.5 McFarland suspension was reached. Fifteen microliters of the bacterial suspension was added to the sample buffer tube. After subsequent mixing by vortexing for 15 s, 200 μl of sample buffer containing the bacteria was transferred into the sample loading chamber of the microfluidic cartridge. As recommended in the manufacturer’s instructions, 8 cartridges were used for every run in the Revogene instrument, using blank cartridges when fewer than 8 samples were processed. Extraction, real-time PCR, and detection are integrated, providing results in 70 min for 8 isolates simultaneously; an additional 15 min was required for sample preparation.

Statistical analysis.The sensitivity and specificity of the Revogene Carba C assay were calculated with their respective 95%CIs using the free software vassarStats website for statistical computation (http://vassarstats.net/). The gold standard was PCR followed by sequencing. The Youden index (sensitivity [%] + specificity [%] − 100) calculates the efficiency of a diagnostic test; a Youden score of 100 indicates a perfect test.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The Revogene Carba C assay was tested on a collection of 118 well-characterized Enterobacterales with reduced susceptibility to carbapenems and on 49 P. aeruginosa and 40 Acinetobacter sp. isolates resistant to carbapenems and expressing various β-lactamases (Tables 1 to 3).

During this evaluation, the Revogene Carba C assay was used as recommended by the manufacturer, on fresh overnight bacterial colonies. The procedure for sample preparation was easy to perform, taking ca. 15 min per eight samples, with a run time of approximately 70 min for one to eight samples simultaneously on the Revogene instrument. The results were interpreted by the Revogene software and provided a positive or negative test result for a given gene, without threshold cycle (CT) values.

Detection of CPE.With Enterobacterales, the Revogene Carba C assay detected all KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48 producers, including OXA-48 variants with carbapenemase activity (OXA-162, -181, -204, and -232), those difficult to detect by phenotypic means (such as OXA-244 and -519) (36, 37), and very recently identified variants (OXA-484, -505, -517, and -793) (Table 1) (38). The chromosomally encoded OXA-535 identified in a Shewanella species (39), which has only 91.3% amino acid identity with OXA-48, has not been detected (data not shown). OXA-535, although not present in Enterobacterales, was used because it is the progenitor of OXA-436, a distantly related OXA-48 variant responsible for an outbreak associated with several enterobacterial species in Denmark (39, 40). It is thus likely that OXA-436 would not be detected by the Revogene Carba C assay, and further studies on the Revogene Carba C assay should be carried out to test OXA-436 producers. Moreover, OXA-163 and OXA-405, two OXA-48 variants that lack significant imipenemase activity (34, 41) but that show strong expanded-spectrum hydrolytic activity, were consistently not detected by the Revogene Carba C assay. It is still debated whether these enzymes are or are not carbapenemases (35, 42). For example, OXA-163 is considered a carbapenemase by the CLSI, although from an enzymatic point of view with respect to imipenem, these variants are not carbapenemases (43); however, their nucleotide sequences are too similar to that of the blaOXA-48 gene to be distinguished by most molecular detection assays (24, 28, 30, 33). The Revogene Carba C assay has this particular advantage of distinguishing these blaOXA-48 variants. Indeed, OXA-163 producers hydrolyze extended-spectrum cephalosporins and are most prevalent in places such as South America, but they need to be individualized as such and not be considered genuine CPE. All the tested IMP variants were correctly identified with Revogene Carba C assay, even those that are not detected by Xpert Carba (Cepheid), such as IMP-2, IMP-8, IMP-11, and IMP-14, or by NG-test Carba5, an immunochromatographic assay, which misses IMP-14 (30, 33, 44). In multiple-carbapenemase producers, all resistance determinants were correctly identified. None of the non-carbapenemase producers or nontargeted-carbapenemase producers yielded positive PCR results.

Using this strain collection (n = 118), the overall sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 95.0% to 100%) and 100% (95%CI = 83.9% to 100%), respectively, for the detection of CPE (Table 1). Extrapolating these results to the global French CPE epidemiology, the Revogene Carba C assay may be able to detect 99.28% (9,555/9,624) of the CPE identified by the French NRC between 2012 and 2018, missing only 69 CPE (2 GES-5 producers, 10 OXA-23 producers, 2 TMB-1 producers, 1 SME-4 producer, 53 IMI producers, and 1 FRI-1 producer) (Table 4 and data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 4

Global performance of the Revogene Carba C assay extrapolated on the global French epidemiology of CPOs

Detection of CP-Pa.Concerning Pseudomonadaceae, all KPC, VIM, and NDM producers were perfectly detected (Table 2); however, only 15/17 IMP producers were detected. Two very rare IMP variants, IMP-31 and IMP-46, were not detected. As claimed by the manufacturer, other carbapenemases, such as GES-like carbapenemases (GES-2 and GES-5), GIM-1, AIM-1, SPM-1, DIM-1, and OXA-198, were not detected (Table 2). All non-carbapenemase producers gave negative results. Excluding strains producing these carbapenemases that are not targeted by the assay, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 93.5% (95%CI = 77.1% to 98.9%) and 100% (95%CI = 78.1% to 100%), respectively, for the detection of CP-Pa (Table 2). Of the total collection (n = 49) including strains producing an untargeted carbapenemase, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 76.3% (95%CI = 59.4% to 87.9%) and 100% (95%CI = 67.8% to 100%), respectively (Table 2). Extrapolating these results to the global French CP-Pa epidemiology, the Revogene Carba C assay may be able to detect 93.33% (167/178) of the CP-Pa isolates identified by the French NRC in 2017, missing only 11 CP-Pa isolates (10 GES producers and 1 DIM-1 producer) (Table 2) (45).

Detection of CP-Ab.Among A. baumannii strains all IMP and NDM producers were perfectly detected (Table 3), resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% (95%CI = 77.0% to 100%) and 100% (95%CI = 82.2% to 100%), respectively, for the targeted carbapenemases in A. baumannii (Table 3). However, as most of the carbapenemases encountered in A. baumannii correspond to nontargeted class D carbapenemases (OXA-23, OXA-40, OXA-58, and OXA-143), when these results are extrapolated to the French epidemiology of CP-Ab, the sensitivity of the assay drops to 12.4% (Table 4) (45).

Conclusion.The Revogene Carba C assay showed excellent sensitivity and specificity for the five most common carbapenemases regardless of the host bacteria, including IMP variants that constitute a very heterogeneous family of enzymes and that are not well detected by most molecular or immunochromatographic assays (46). Our study demonstrated that the Revogene Carba C assay is well adapted to the French epidemiology of CPE and CP-Pa, which reflects the epidemiology in many European countries. Its simplicity and short turnaround time make it suitable for use in the routine microbiology laboratory. It can provide results from colonies that grow on Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar but also on those from selective screening media.

The assay detects the main carbapenemases encountered in Enterobacterales (KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48-like) and in P. aeruginosa (VIM, IMP, NDM, and KPC) but only the minor ones in A. baumannii (VIM, IMP, and NDM), as the most widespread OXA carbapenemases usually identified in A. baumannii (OXA-23-like, OXA-24/-40-like, and OXA-58-like) are not targeted by this assay. When extrapolated to the global French epidemiology of CPOs, we would expect (at best) 99.28% sensitivity for CPE detection and 93.33% for CP-Pa but only 12.5% for CP-Ab. Thus, Younden’s index for the French situation would be 99.27, 93.3, and 10 for CPE, CP-Pa, and CP-Ab, respectively.

As for most molecular assays, mutation and/or polymorphisms in the primer/probe binding region of the targeted gene may lead to false-negative results, and thus some variants may not be detected. It is of outmost importance that a molecular test be evaluated on the local epidemiology in order to know which are the alleles that might be missed. Regular evaluation of novel variants is required to assess the sensitivity and specificity of this assay in a constantly evolving carbapenemase field. The main drawback of this assay is that it so far has been validated only on pure cultures. Evaluation directly on rectal swabs is a mandatory next step for the assay to be fully useful for carbapenemase gene detection.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), the University Paris-Sud, and the Laboratory of Excellence in Research on Medication and Innovative Therapeutics (LERMIT) supported by a grant from the French National Research Agency (ANR-10-LABX-33).

L.D. is a coinventor of the Carba NP test, the patent for which has been licensed to bioMérieux (La Balmes les Grottes, France).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 18 November 2019.
    • Returned for modification 20 December 2019.
    • Accepted 24 January 2020.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 29 January 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 Girlich et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Logan LK,
    2. Weinstein RA
    . 2017. The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: the impact and evolution of a global menace. J Infect Dis 215:S28–S36. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiw282.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gniadek TJ,
    2. Carroll KC,
    3. Simner PJ
    . 2016. Carbapenem-resistant non-glucose-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli: the missing piece to the puzzle. J Clin Microbiol 54:1700–1710. doi:10.1128/JCM.03264-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Nordmann P,
    2. Naas T,
    3. Poirel L
    . 2011. Global spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1791–1798. doi:10.3201/eid1710.110655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Naas T,
    2. Dortet L,
    3. Iorga BI
    . 2016. Structural and functional aspects of class A carbapenemases. Curr Drug Targets 17:1006–1028. doi:10.2174/1389450117666160310144501.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Nordmann P,
    2. Dortet L,
    3. Poirel L
    . 2012. Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: here is the storm!. Trends Mol Med 18:263–272. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2012.03.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bonnin RA,
    2. Nordmann P,
    3. Poirel L
    . 2013. Screening and deciphering antibiotic resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: a state of the art. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 11:571–583. doi:10.1586/eri.13.38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Queenan AM,
    2. Bush K
    . 2007. Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:440–458. doi:10.1128/CMR.00001-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Albiger B,
    2. Glasner C,
    3. Struelens MJ,
    4. Grundmann H,
    5. Monnet DL
    , European Survey of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) Working Group. 2015. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe: assessment by national experts from 38 countries. Euro Surveill 20:30062. doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.45.30062.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Potron A,
    2. Poirel L,
    3. Nordmann P
    . 2015. Emerging broad-spectrum resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii: mechanisms and epidemiology. Int J Antimicrob Agents 45:568–585. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.03.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Falagas ME,
    2. Karageorgopoulos DE,
    3. Nordmann P
    . 2011. Therapeutic options for infections with Enterobacteriaceae producing carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes. Future Microbiol 6:653–666. doi:10.2217/fmb.11.49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Alizadeh N,
    2. Rezaee MA,
    3. Kafil HS,
    4. Barhaghi MHS,
    5. Memar MY,
    6. Milani M,
    7. Hasani A,
    8. Ghotaslou R
    . 2018. Detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae by chromogenic screening media. J Microbiol Methods 153:40–44. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2018.09.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Girlich D,
    2. Bouihat N,
    3. Poirel L,
    4. Benouda A,
    5. Nordmann P
    . 2014. High rate of faecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase and OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae at a university hospital in Morocco. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:350–354. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Nordmann P,
    2. Poirel L,
    3. Dortet L
    . 2012. Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis 18:1503–1507. doi:10.3201/eid1809.120355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Muntean MM,
    2. Muntean AA,
    3. Gauthier L,
    4. Creton E,
    5. Cotellon G,
    6. Popa MI,
    7. Bonnin RA,
    8. Naas T
    . 2018. Evaluation of the rapid carbapenem inactivation method (rCIM): a phenotypic screening test for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:900–908. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx519.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Boutal H,
    2. Vogel A,
    3. Bernabeu S,
    4. Devilliers K,
    5. Creton E,
    6. Cotellon G,
    7. Plaisance M,
    8. Oueslati S,
    9. Dortet L,
    10. Jousset A,
    11. Simon S,
    12. Naas T,
    13. Volland H
    . 2018. A multiplex lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid identification of NDM-, KPC-, IMP- and VIM-type and OXA-48-like carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:909–915. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx521.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Glupczynski Y,
    2. Evrard S,
    3. Ote I,
    4. Mertens P,
    5. Huang TD,
    6. Leclipteux T,
    7. Bogaerts P
    . 2016. Evaluation of two new commercial immunochromatographic assays for the rapid detection of OXA-48 and KPC carbapenemases from cultured bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:1217–1222. doi:10.1093/jac/dkv472.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lasserre C,
    2. De Saint Martin L,
    3. Cuzon G,
    4. Bogaerts P,
    5. Lamar E,
    6. Glupczynski Y,
    7. Naas T,
    8. Tandé D
    . 2015. Efficient detection of carbapenemase activity in Enterobacteriaceae by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization−time of flight mass spectrometry in less than 30 minutes. J Clin Microbiol 53:2163–2171. doi:10.1128/JCM.03467-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Bogaerts P,
    2. Yunus S,
    3. Massart M,
    4. Huang T-D,
    5. Glupczynski Y
    . 2016. Evaluation of the BYG Carba Test, a new electrochemical assay for rapid laboratory detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 54:349–358. doi:10.1128/JCM.02404-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Bernabeu S,
    2. Dortet L,
    3. Naas T
    . 2017. Evaluation of the β-CARBATM test, a colorimetric test for the rapid detection of carbapenemase activity in Gram-negative bacilli. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:1646–1658. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx061.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Dortet L,
    2. Bernabeu S,
    3. Gonzalez C,
    4. Naas T
    . 2018. Evaluation of the Carbapenem Detection Set™ for the detection and characterization of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.02.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Doyle D,
    2. Peirano G,
    3. Lascols C,
    4. Lloyd T,
    5. Church DL,
    6. Pitout J
    . 2012. Laboratory detection of Enterobacteriaceae that produce carbapenemases. J Clin Microbiol 50:3877–3880. doi:10.1128/JCM.02117-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. McMullen AR,
    2. Yarbrough ML,
    3. Wallace MA,
    4. Shupe A,
    5. Burnham C-A
    . 2017. Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods to detect carbapenemase production in Gram-negative bacilli. Clin Chem 63:723–730. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2016.264804.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ellington MJ,
    2. Ekelund O,
    3. Aarestrup FM,
    4. Canton R,
    5. Doumith M,
    6. Giske C,
    7. Grundman H,
    8. Hasman H,
    9. Holden MT,
    10. Hopkins KL,
    11. Iredell J,
    12. Kahlmeter G,
    13. Köser CU,
    14. MacGowan A,
    15. Mevius D,
    16. Mulvey M,
    17. Naas T,
    18. Peto T,
    19. Rolain JM,
    20. Samuelsen Ø,
    21. Woodford N
    . 2017. The role of whole genome sequencing in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria: report from the EUCAST Subcommittee. Clin Microbiol Infect 23:2–22. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Girlich D,
    2. Bernabeu S,
    3. Grosperrin V,
    4. Langlois I,
    5. Begasse C,
    6. Arangia N,
    7. Creton E,
    8. Cotellon G,
    9. Sauvadet A,
    10. Dortet L,
    11. Naas T
    . 2018. Evaluation of the Amplidiag CarbaR + MCR kit for the accurate detection of carbapenemase-producing and colistin-resistant bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 57:e01800-18. doi:10.1128/JCM.01800-18.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Oueslati S,
    2. Girlich D,
    3. Dortet L,
    4. Naas T
    . 2018. Evaluation of the Amplidiag CarbaR+VRE Kit for accurate detection of carbapenemase-producing bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 56:e01092-17. doi:10.1128/JCM.01092-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Nijhuis R,
    2. Samuelsen Ø,
    3. Savelkoul P,
    4. van Zwet A
    . 2013. Evaluation of a new real-time PCR assay (Check-Direct CPE) for rapid detection of KPC, OXA-48, VIM, and NDM carbapenemases using spiked rectal swabs. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 77:316–320. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.09.007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. García-Fernández S,
    2. Morosini MI,
    3. Marco F,
    4. Gijón D,
    5. Vergara A,
    6. Vila J,
    7. Ruiz-Garbajosa P,
    8. Cantón R
    . 2015. Evaluation of the eazyplex SuperBug CRE system for rapid detection of carbapenemases and ESBLs in clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates recovered at two Spanish hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:1047–1050. doi:10.1093/jac/dku476.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Girlich D,
    2. Bernabeu S,
    3. Fortineau N,
    4. Dortet L,
    5. Naas T
    . 2018. Evaluation of the CRE and ESBL ELITe MGB kits for the accurate detection of carbapenemase- or CTX-M–producing bacteria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 92:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.02.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Girlich D,
    2. Oueslati S,
    3. Bernabeu S,
    4. Fortineau N,
    5. Dortet L,
    6. Naas T
    . 2019. Detection of carbapenemase-producers directly from rectal swabs using the BD Max™ check-points CPO system, abstr CPHM-957. ASM Microbe, 20 to 27 June 2019, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  30. 30.↵
    1. Dortet L,
    2. Fusaro M,
    3. Naas T
    . 2016. Improvement of the Xpert Carba-R kit for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:3832–3837. doi:10.1128/AAC.00517-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Hoyos-Mallecot Y,
    2. Ouzani S,
    3. Dortet L,
    4. Fortineau N,
    5. Naas T
    . 2017. Performance of the Xpert Carba-R v2 in the daily workflow of a hygiene unit in a country with a low prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:774–777. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.01.025.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. Dortet L,
    2. Cuzon G,
    3. Ponties V,
    4. Nordmann P
    . 2017. Trends in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, France, 2012 to 2014. Euro Surveill 22:30461. doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.6.30461.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Lucena Baeza L,
    2. Pfennigwerth N,
    3. Hamprecht A
    . 2019. Rapid and easy detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales in the routine laboratory using the new GenePOC Carba/Revogene Carba C assay. J Clin Microbiol 57:e00597-19. doi:10.1128/JCM.00597-19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Oueslati S,
    2. Nordmann P,
    3. Poirel L
    . 2015. Heterogeneous hydrolytic features for OXA-48-like β-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:1059–1063. doi:10.1093/jac/dku524.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Dortet L,
    2. Naas T
    . 2017. Noncarbapenemase OXA-48 variants (OXA-163 and OXA-405) falsely detected as carbapenemases by the β Carba test. J Clin Microbiol 55:654–655. doi:10.1128/JCM.02086-16.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Dabos L,
    2. Bogaerts P,
    3. Bonnin RA,
    4. Zavala A,
    5. Sacré P,
    6. Iorga BI,
    7. Huang DT,
    8. Glupczynski Y,
    9. Naas T
    . 2018. Genetic and biochemical characterization of OXA-519, a novel OXA-48-like β-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00469-18. doi:10.1128/AAC.00469-18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Hoyos-Mallecot Y,
    2. Naas T,
    3. Bonnin RA,
    4. Patino R,
    5. Glaser P,
    6. Fortineau N,
    7. Dortet L
    . 2017. OXA-244-producing Escherichia coli isolates, a challenge for clinical microbiology laboratories. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00818-17. doi:10.1128/AAC.00818-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Naas T,
    2. Oueslati S,
    3. Bonnin RA,
    4. Dabos ML,
    5. Zavala A,
    6. Dortet L,
    7. Retailleau P,
    8. Iorga BI
    . 2017. Beta-lactamase database (BLDB)—structure and function. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 32:917–919. doi:10.1080/14756366.2017.1344235.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    1. Jousset AB,
    2. Dabos L,
    3. Bonnin RA,
    4. Girlich D,
    5. Potron A,
    6. Cabanel N,
    7. Dortet L,
    8. Glaser P,
    9. Naas T
    . 2017. CTX-M-15-producing Shewanella species clinical isolate expressing OXA-535, a chromosome-encoded OXA-48 variant, putative progenitor of the plasmid-encoded OXA-436. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01879-17. doi:10.1128/AAC.01879-17.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Samuelsen Ø,
    2. Hansen F,
    3. Aasnæs B,
    4. Hasman H,
    5. Lund BA,
    6. Leiros H-K,
    7. Lilje B,
    8. Janice J,
    9. Jakobsen L,
    10. Littauer P,
    11. Søes LM,
    12. Holzknecht BJ,
    13. Andersen LP,
    14. Stegger M,
    15. Andersen PS,
    16. Hammerum AM
    . 2017. Dissemination and characteristics of a novel plasmid-encoded carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamase, OXA-436, found in isolates from four patients at six different hospitals in Denmark. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01260-17. doi:10.1128/AAC.01260-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Dortet L,
    2. Oueslati S,
    3. Jeannot K,
    4. Tandé D,
    5. Naas T,
    6. Nordmann P
    . 2015. Genetic and biochemical characterization of OXA-405, an OXA-48-type extended-spectrum β-lactamase without significant carbapenemase activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:3823–3828. doi:10.1128/AAC.05058-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Arlet G,
    2. Decré D,
    3. Lavollay M,
    4. Podglajen I
    . 2017. Reply to “Noncarbapenemase OXA-48 variants (OXA-163 and OXA-405) falsely detected as carbapenemases by the β Carba test. J Clin Microbiol 55:656–657. doi:10.1128/JCM.02114-16.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Dabos L,
    2. Oueslati S,
    3. Bernabeu S,
    4. Jousset AB,
    5. Dortet L,
    6. Naas T
    . 2019. Oxa-48-like enzymes: carbapenemase or not?, abstr AAR-652. ASM Microbe, 20 to 27 June 2019, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  44. 44.↵
    1. Hopkins KL,
    2. Meunier D,
    3. Naas T,
    4. Volland H,
    5. Woodford N
    . 2018. Evaluation of the NG-Test CARBA 5 multiplex immunochromatographic assay for the detection of KPC, OXA-48-like, NDM, VIM and IMP carbapenemases. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:3523–3526. doi:10.1093/jac/dky342.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    http://www.cnr-resistance-antibiotiques.fr/ressources/pages/Rapport_CNR_2017_VF_2.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2020.
  46. 46.↵
    1. Potron A,
    2. Fournier D,
    3. Emeraud C,
    4. Triponney P,
    5. Plésiat P,
    6. Naas T,
    7. Dortet L
    . 2019. Evaluation of the immunochromatographic NG-Test Carba 5 for rapid identification of carbapenemase in nonfermenters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00968-19. doi:10.1128/AAC.00968-19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Evaluation of the Revogene Carba C Assay for Detection and Differentiation of Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria
Delphine Girlich, Marine Laguide, Laurent Dortet, Thierry Naas
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2020, 58 (4) e01927-19; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01927-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of the Revogene Carba C Assay for Detection and Differentiation of Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluation of the Revogene Carba C Assay for Detection and Differentiation of Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria
Delphine Girlich, Marine Laguide, Laurent Dortet, Thierry Naas
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2020, 58 (4) e01927-19; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01927-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

multiplex PCR
Gram-negative bacteria
real time
screening

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X