Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Special Issue Letter to the Editor

Saliva as an Alternate Specimen Source for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic Patients Using Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2

Clare McCormick-Baw, Kristi Morgan, Donna Gaffney, Yareli Cazares, Karen Jaworski, Adrienne Byrd, Kyle Molberg, Dominick Cavuoti
Alexander J. McAdam, Editor
Clare McCormick-Baw
aDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristi Morgan
bMicrobiology Laboratory, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donna Gaffney
bMicrobiology Laboratory, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yareli Cazares
bMicrobiology Laboratory, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Jaworski
bMicrobiology Laboratory, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adrienne Byrd
bMicrobiology Laboratory, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle Molberg
aDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominick Cavuoti
aDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander J. McAdam
Boston Children's Hospital
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01109-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

LETTER

Among the many facets of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic is the unprecedented pressure it has placed on different points of the supply chain for hospital systems worldwide, such as collection devices for the diagnosis of COVID-19. The emergency use authorization of most of the commonly used platforms for SARS-CoV-2 testing is approved for nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens. However, with the increasing need for alternative sources due to the NPS shortage, our institution sought to validate saliva specimens for the diagnosis of COVID-19 using the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Sunnyvale, CA) PCR test. The Xpert SARS-CoV-2 assay is a sample-to-answer real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) test with a run time of approximately 30 to 51 minutes (1). There are two targets, E and N2; the detection of both targets or N2 alone is considered positive, and the detection of E alone is considered presumptive positive.

We compared our test samples with NPS specimens using 3 ml universal transport media (UTM) (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) with unpreserved saliva collected in the emergency department (ED) and from patients in a COVID-positive hospital unit. The specimens were collected prospectively in the ED, when a patient with suspected COVID-19 was being investigated, following institutional and national guidelines for testing (2) or randomly in the hospital COVID unit from patients not requiring mechanical ventilation. Education to the ED nursing staff and the nurses on the COVID unit was disseminated to encourage saliva, not sputum, collection. Also, it was highly recommended that patients did not have any food, drink, tobacco, or gum for 30 minutes prior to collection. Saliva was collected in sterile urine cups or sterile 50-ml conical tubes. Five milliliters of saliva was requested; however, specimens were considered acceptable if approximately 1 ml of saliva was submitted. Once specimens were collected, they were labeled with demographic information, double-bagged, and submitted to the laboratory through the pneumatic tube system. The liquid, nonviscous components of each specimen were drawn into the disposable pipettes (300 μl) issued with Xpert SARS-CoV-2 cartridges and directly inoculated and run according to the manufacturer’s instructions (1). The NPS specimens were collected in the standard fashion, and similarly, testing was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All NPS samples were tested on demand. The saliva samples were held at 2°C to 8°C for up to 12 h prior to testing (validation of saliva was performed on first shift only).

A total of 156 paired NPS and saliva specimens were tested. The overall positivity was 50/156 (32.1%); the average age was 47.8 years old with a male/female (M/F) ratio of 90/66. The community rate of positivity during the week of collection was 11.1% (3). A total of 153/156 (98%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 94.48% to 99.60%) samples were in overall agreement. Also, 47/49 samples were positive in saliva compared with the NPS, resulting in a positive percent agreement of 96% (95% CI, 86.02% to 99.5%). A total of 105/106 samples had a negative saliva and NPS result. A single sample demonstrated detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in the saliva, but the NPS was negative (1/106), resulting in a negative percent agreement of 99% (95% CI, 94.86% to 99.98%). The average cycle threshold values are summarized and compared in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 PCR assay results of nasopharyngeal and saliva specimensa

We conclude that saliva is an acceptable alternative source for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids. Another advantage to saliva versus NPS is that the process to collect saliva is noninvasive, and a patient, with education and coaching, could self-collect the specimen. These differences could reduce the risk to health care workers, decrease personal protective equipment usage, and provide less discomfort to patients during collection. Furthermore, an important preanalytical variable for SARS-CoV-2 testing is proper nasopharyngeal collection which may have been a contributing factor for the discrepant saliva positive/nasopharyngeal swab negative sample. Because saliva has excellent agreement with NPS in UTM, saliva could potentially be used for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in symptomatic patients using the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 PCR test.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This research did not receive financial support from any funding agency or commercial vendor.

  • Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Cepheid. 2020. Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 instructions for use. 302–3562, Rev C. Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA.
  2. 2.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. Evaluating and testing persons for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/clinical-criteria.html.
  3. 3.↵
    Dallas County Health and Human Services. Dallas County Health and Human Services 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) summary. Dallas County Health and Human Services, Dallas, TX. https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/hhs/2019-nCoV/COVID-19%20DCHHS%20Summary_050520.pdf.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Saliva as an Alternate Specimen Source for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic Patients Using Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2
Clare McCormick-Baw, Kristi Morgan, Donna Gaffney, Yareli Cazares, Karen Jaworski, Adrienne Byrd, Kyle Molberg, Dominick Cavuoti
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jul 2020, 58 (8) e01109-20; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01109-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Saliva as an Alternate Specimen Source for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic Patients Using Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Saliva as an Alternate Specimen Source for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic Patients Using Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2
Clare McCormick-Baw, Kristi Morgan, Donna Gaffney, Yareli Cazares, Karen Jaworski, Adrienne Byrd, Kyle Molberg, Dominick Cavuoti
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jul 2020, 58 (8) e01109-20; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01109-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • LETTER
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

COVID-19
Cepheid
PCR
SARS-CoV-2
Xpert

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X