TABLE 3.

Analysis of discordant M-NW similarity test valuesa

Clinical sampleNeutralization serotypeHighest M-NW similarity index (%) with respec-tive reference strainbHighest M-NW similarity index (%)cGenotype determined by M-NW similarity indexd
GV34EV1271.871.8EV12
M250EV1273.773.7EV12
270N97EV1857.466.5EV6 Burgess
R100EV1846.267.4EV15CH96
MD92-1649EV2574.974.9EV25
MN94-1828EV2574.174.1EV25
PA94-5753CAV1652.365.9ENV71 BrCr
GA95-2095CAV1651.866.7ENV71 BrCr
TX95-2147CAV1674.574.5CAV16
NC83-5515EV247575EV24
TAI84-5839CAV1673.873.8CAV16
OK85-6388UNTNA66.4EV7
VA86-6765UNTNA67.6EV24
VA86-6776EV1371.571.5EV13
CT87-7122UNTNA68.2EV15 CH96
CT87-7123UNTNA68.2EV15 CH96
MT87-7421EV374.174.1EV3
GUT88-8020CAV217474CAV21
MD88-8157EV37373EV3
GUT88-8436CAV2174.374.3CAV21
PA89-9262CAV1674.874.8CAV16
OK89-9448EV1873.973.9EV18
RI94-1959EV2174.474.4EV21
CB6IS2CBV673.673.6CBV6
  • a Abbreviations: UNT, “untypeable” EV. See footnote a of Table 1 for definitions of the other abbreviations.

  • b Values lower than 75% are in boldface.

  • c Results higher than those obtained for the corresponding reference strain are in boldface.

  • d Serotype determined by the highest score obtained elsewhere (17). Results that differed from the neutralization serotype are in boldface.